Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama currently leads in NH delegates: 9 delegates + 3 superdelegates...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:25 PM
Original message
Obama currently leads in NH delegates: 9 delegates + 3 superdelegates...
It turns out that Hillary Clinton hasn't exactly won in New Hampshire, after all. In fact, she's currently second to Barrack Obama in the apportioning of that state's delegates:


Clinton's popular-vote margin over Obama was razor-thin - fewer than 8,000 votes, or 3%, with 96% of precincts reporting. As a result, each will come away from New Hampshire with the pledges of 9 delegates. John Edwards, finishing in a distant third place, will take the remaining 4. A look at the national scorecard finds Obama barely in the lead with 25 delegates to Clinton's 24.

There's more. The real winner in New Hampshire can't be declared until you factor in superdelegates. These are party leaders who are allowed to vote at the convention, but may make their own choices at any time, and without regard to the popular vote results. New Hampshire has 8 superdelegates; of these, 2 have declared their support for Clinton, 3 for Obama, and 3 are undeclared.



There are 2,025 superdelegates total. Hillary currently has declarations of support from 183 of them; Obama has 78.


http://www.kansascity.com/445/story/437288.html


Interesting. And kind of Byzantine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmm that said Obama did not win Iowa - Clinton - 183 Obama - 78 (this includes Supers)
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 04:28 PM by Ioo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. actually she nearly has 10% locked down already
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 04:35 PM by sunonmars

I only just realised she almost has 10% of what she needs already. You can be guaranteed after last night, she will be all out to lock the rest down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Are you counting the superdelegates? They aren't locked down, they can change
their votes at any time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. "...razor-thin - fewer than 8,000 votes..."
I wouldn't call 3% razor thin. In 1990, when I was still in MA, Weld beat Silber for governor by 1/2%. Likewise, Bush's "win" in FL in 2000 can be described as razor thin.

In NH, presidential candidates out-number voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Those superdelegates can change their votes at any time up to the convention. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. they could, the sun could also burn out next wednesday...
The whole reason for the SD is so that the party leadership also gets its say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. And the leader in superdelegates in 04 was Howard Dean. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC