Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AW...Jeeze..."Judge Won't Inquire into CIA TAPES CASE! ...RENT DICKENS...it's AMERICA in '08!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:49 PM
Original message
AW...Jeeze..."Judge Won't Inquire into CIA TAPES CASE! ...RENT DICKENS...it's AMERICA in '08!
Let's just let that Bus or Mack Truck run over us with MORE TIRE TRACKS! WHERE ARE ARE DEM REPS ON THIS? WHERE ARE THEY?

Rent or Netflix DICKENS...any BOOK that's been done for Media...BECAUSE...we LIVE IN THOSE TIMES!

HORRIBLE NEWS! I went over to "Empty Wheel's Site" (Marcy Wheeler)...she's authority on all this crap and even HER REPORT is DOOM AND GLOOM! Outta here...sick of ELECTION CRAP, MEDIA SPIN AND LIES...and am going back to DICKENS to make sense of some of it. We've BEEN HERE BEFORE...we need to REGROUP!

----------------


Judge Won't Inquire Into CIA Tapes Case
AP NewsBreak: Judge Refuses to Investigate the Destruction of CIA Interrogation Videos
By MATT APUZZO
The Associated Press

WASHINGTON

A federal judge refused on Wednesday to delve into the destruction of CIA interrogation videos, saying there was no evidence the Bush administration violated a court order and the Justice Department deserved time to conduct its own investigation.

The decision by U.S. District Judge Henry H. Kennedy was a victory for the Bush administration, which had urged the courts not to wade into a politically charged issue already being investigated by the Justice Department, CIA and Congress.

The CIA has acknowledged last month that in 2005 it destroyed videos of officers using tough interrogation methods while questioning two al-Qaida suspects. Lawyers for other terrorism suspects quickly asked Kennedy to hold hearings, saying the executive branch had proved itself unreliable and could not be trusted to investigate its own potential wrongdoing.

Kennedy disagreed, ruling that attorneys hadn't "presented anything to cause this court to question whether the Department of Justice will follow the facts wherever they may lead and live up to the assurances it made to this court."

Attorney General Michael Mukasey recently appointed a prosecutor to conduct a criminal investigation into destruction of the tapes. John Durham, a career public corruption and organized crime prosecutor, has a reputation for being independent.

Kennedy, a former prosecutor who was appointed to the bench by President Clinton, said he had been assured that the Justice Department would report back if it found evidence that a court order had been violated.

"There is no reason to disregard the Department of Justice's assurances," Kennedy said.

Attorney David Remes had said a judicial inquiry might involve testimony from senior lawyers at the White House and Justice Department. Government attorneys, appearing in court Dec. 21, said such hearings would disrupt and possibly derail the Justice Department inquiry.

Lawyers for other terrorism suspects have filed similar requests before other judges. While Kennedy's decision doesn't require those judges to follow suit, it will help bolster the Justice Department's argument that they should not wade into the investigation.

Kennedy had ordered the government not to destroy any evidence of mistreatment or abuse of detainees held at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. But the two suspects interrogated on video Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri were not held at Guantanamo Bay. They were interrogated in secret CIA prisons overseas.


Kennedy said Wednesday he saw no evidence those tapes were covered by his court order.

Remes, who represents Yemeni detainees at Guantanamo Bay, argued that destruction of the tapes may have violated a more general rule prohibiting the government from destroying any evidence that could be relevant in a case, even if not directly noted in a court order.
http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=4111069
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bush appointment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sadly...Kennedy was Clinton Appointment according to Marcy...
whose "Empty Wheel" who did great reporting on "Plame Case" with "Firedoglake" gals.

:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Well, that sucks.
Here we're all fired up at the prospect of appointing our own judges and THIS is what we have to look forward to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No, actually a Clinton appointment
Judge Henry H. Kennedy, Jr.

Judge Kennedy was appointed to the U.S. District Court in September 1997. He graduated from Princeton University in 1970 and received a J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1973. Following graduation, he worked for a short time for the law firm of Reavis, Pogue, Neal and Rose, then served as an Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Columbia from 1973 to 1976. From 1976 to 1979 he served as a United States Magistrate for the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. In December 1979, he was appointed Associate Judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, where he served until his appointment to the federal bench.

http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/kennedy-bio.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. OK...off to watch "Hard Times" or maybe "David Copperfield" ....
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 09:15 PM by KoKo01
to get a glimpse of America in '08. I'm avoiding the Holocaust Stuff...because I've watched so much of that...I need a little Dickens for some literary soul/sense of what it all means....to those who worked hard with a feeling "of the people" which we are. Watching old Nazi Movies just doesn't have that same sense of tragedy and lost idealism or inner saddness at our "hard times" that Dickens could bring forth. And...I'm just sort of trashy that way...... Moving back beyond Holocaust to the real "hard times" for workers and families coming....that POLITICIANS will NEVER SEE until the EVIL DEED HAS DEVASTATED EVERYONE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC