Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards is not competitive in South Carolina

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:42 AM
Original message
Edwards is not competitive in South Carolina
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 12:03 PM by cali
Why do I mention this? Because of the stream of comments today about how Kerry is stabbing him in the back by endorsing Obama in SC.

Edwards hasn't polled above 15% in months. Yeah, yeah, polls aren't worth shit, but the truth is simple: The AA community comprises 50% of dem primary voters. Obama gets the lion's share. Clinton gets the rest. That leaves 50% to be split 3 ways. It's a two person race in SC.

The likely explanation for Kerry's announcing his support for Obama in SC is that he hopes to help him with white voters and in particular, white men.

Kerry doesn't owe and fidelity to Edwards. I understand that Edwards supporters are stung over this endorsement, but logically, it's not even about Edwards as much as it's about Obama and Clinton.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree except "Edwards has never polled above 15% in SC" isn't true. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. OK
I didn't actually check it out, but I'll take your word for it. I edited it to reflect that Edwards hasn't polled above 15% in months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'd cry but, ever since that botched facelift I can't make tears nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. also we want people to vote/endore according to their beliefs and not their previous ties
so imo kerry did the right thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkansas Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. Edwards abandoned South Carolina for Iowa
and got burned. After 04, I understand why he tried that strategy. It just didn't work though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kerry could have shown a little class and chosen one of the other 49 states
in which to make his endorsement, but that says more about Kerry than either Obama or Edwards.

Personally, I think Kerry's endorsement is going to hurt Obama with some independents and repubs who are crossing over to vote for change. Maybe not so much in SC, but Obama needs to run on his own and distance himself from the past as much as possible to win as many of those votes as he can, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. Kerry has a right to endorse who he wants...
I put what's in the best interest for the country ahead of personal ties. So did Kerry.

As far as Edwards and SC, I'm not putting too much weight on the polls and pundits - but, if JE does not win there or Nevada, he is gonna have a hell of a time getting any momentum by Super Tuesday.

A non-win anywhere may be the beginning of the end of his campaign - which would be unfortunate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. Too many people are reading way too much into Kerry's endorsement of the big O.
It is very simple. Kerry is endorsing Obama because Kerry and Obama are very, very similar in their outlooks on politics.

If you liked Kerry backing down from counting votes in the stolen election of 2004, essentially backing away from a fight, then you will understand why he is backing the big O. Neither men see stolen elections as worth fighting for. Kerry is not a fighter when it comes to determining what the people want and neither is Obama.

They are two peas in a pod in a lets all be bipartisan and not investigate the bushies kind of way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. You shouldn't generalize so much, Cali.
I am a very loyal Edwards supporter. I don't think many Edwards supporters expected Kerry to endorse Edwards. Would it have been nice? Sure. It would have been shocking though. I NEVER thought Kerry would endorse Edwards.

I'm THRILLED he endorsed Obama over Clinton.

So....you can take that knife you are trying to dig in my back out now, OK?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You shouldn't personalize that which isn't personal
I'm just trying to present factual information and an opinion based on that information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I just hate it when people say Edwards supporters do this or think that.
You see very little of what Edwards supporters really say or think. The main people bitching about Kerry's endorsement aren't even Edwards supporters!

If you want factual....then you must know that John Edwards NEVER expected John Kerry to support him.

Factual? THIS IS NO FREAKIN' SURPRISE!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phillycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. You're trying to present "factual information", but
you put erroneous data in your OP (Edwards has never polled above 15% in SC) and then when called on it, you admit you "didn't check". But we are expected to believe this is just a presentation of cold hard facts with no agenda on your part. Huh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. He hasn't polled above 15% in months- since the campaigns
really kicked into gear- and he may or may not have polled higher than that a year or ago. The point is the same: He's not viable in SC. He hasn't been viable in SC since the campaigns really got going. It's simple stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Edwards peaked at 30% in May, 2007, he was last above 20% in August
He's been between 7% and 18% since then.

http://www.pollster.com/08-SC-Dem-Pres-Primary.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Not that I think Edwards has a chance at winning SC, but
can we agree that the polls aren't infallible by any means, especially after what happened in New Hampshire?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. It's naive to think this had nothing to do with Edwards..
of course it does.

I also don't see how Kerry helps much with white men in South Carolina, but I'll take your word for it.

He doesn't owe fidelity to Edwards by any means, but they were running mates, and holding off on endorsing for a month or so would have been a classier move on his part IMO.

Kerry's probably just doing what he thinks is right, but I don't agree with it at all for whatever it's worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. polls and pundits
bullshittery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC