Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could anything be worse than the health care disaster we have now?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 09:56 AM
Original message
Could anything be worse than the health care disaster we have now?

Yes, it could.

Mandatory health insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. The insurance companies' dream.
Fend off real UHC and while you're at it, force everbody to buy their crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, it could. Medical FICOs. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. The rightwingnuts would say "YES, there is"--higher taxes n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. No - the Chinese system is much worse
You have to pay for your medical costs up front - even if it's extreme surgery- and if you're lucky enough to have insurance, you have to go to the insurance company yourself to get reimsbursement.

It's no wonder that China is the world's most medicated society, as people try to pop pills in order to avoid/put off surgery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angela Shelley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. Just a thought about mandatory health insurance.
What if there was "mandatory health insurance" and the MANDATORY applied not only to individuals but also to employers.

Meaning, if every employer was required to provide an insurance plan to his or her employees, and every employee had to be signed up.

This way, the employers would look for better health care plans, because that would make the job more attractive for the employee. Employers looking for affordable plans would induce more competition between the insurance companies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. But in a weak job market, they'd be able to change the plan to a cheaper less comprehensive one,
Edited on Fri Jan-11-08 11:15 AM by closeupready
save money, and still be able to attract workers.

So long-term, that doesn't solve anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angela Shelley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Without having any statistics at hand,
I can imagine that many employers are "good guys" and are truly interested in keeping the best employees which they can find.

Maybe we could try "mandatory comprehensive insurance plans"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I don't necessarily agree. Businesses put making money supreme, which is neither fair nor unfair,
just the way it is, and if they can make money by trimming some "fat" here and there, they will (at least in my experience). In a weak job market, pay and benefits will always be trimmed.

Yes, there are those organizations which try to do the right thing, even if it's a little more expensive, but if we are going to have a reliable health care system, then the typical worker shouldn't have to rely merely upon the good graces of the powers that be.

Maybe a "mandatory comprehensive insurance plan" would work. It would keep them from cutting too much. The only caveat would be, would the requirements for mandatory coverage have to be changed every few years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC