|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 04:03 PM Original message |
Can the people of CT recall Lieberman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemKR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. I'm at my boiling point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. I love this response... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 04:12 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Oh that's a good one! Why don't a bunch of us head over to CT and get the petitions going! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salinen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 07:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
26. I love that episode |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salinen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 07:38 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Joe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 08:59 PM Response to Reply #26 |
39. "I said it once, but I think I got away with it." LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malmapus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 09:24 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. "OF COURSE YOU STARTED IT! YOU INVADED POLAND!!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 09:54 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Long live "The Germans"! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-23-07 12:38 PM Response to Reply #43 |
57. The irony is that Basil is, himself, the quintessential, crypto-Nazi: as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
3. A lot of smart people here say no, unfortunately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kansasblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 04:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. there was even a website started.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 07:48 PM Response to Reply #8 |
31. Oh, well I guess if there's a WEBSITE, that trumps the law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 09:05 PM Response to Reply #3 |
41. No State can recall a US Senator or House Member.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
4. Ugggh! If he's gonna keep this sh*t up, he should just go ahead and officially become a Republic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. were he, by some chance, to choke on his own bile,any idea who the gov would appoint in his place? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 05:04 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. Gov. Rell is a Republican and she would appoint a Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 08:48 PM Response to Reply #15 |
35. True but there would be a special election in 2008 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
7. I don't believe the Constitution provides a recall provision. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
9. And what makes Repusses think he won't switch back if it gets too hot in the kitchen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 08:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
36. Holy Joe is a sapling in the wind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignacio Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
10. Wouldn't we need a Constitutional amendment to allow this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
11. Connecticut residents: just think...you could have had NED LAMONT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 05:09 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Your post is annoying to those of us in CT who actually WORKED for Ned Lamont. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 06:43 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I think Andy's comments are geared toward the numbskulls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 07:38 PM Response to Reply #17 |
27. Thank you, but I don't believe they are here on DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RiverStone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 07:41 PM Response to Reply #16 |
29. Just curious...a question about Loserman DEMS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 07:47 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. They fell for Bill Clinton and his big push for Lieberman on LKL - a win/win for Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-23-07 12:45 AM Response to Reply #30 |
54. Hey, Bill Clinton - FUCK YOU for supporting Lieberman. Why the FUCK didn't you support the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 07:51 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. I wish I knew! I don't have a finger on their pulse unfortunately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
REACTIVATED IN CT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-23-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #29 |
60. I can tell you that the local paper which supported him in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Theres-a (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 09:58 PM Response to Reply #16 |
44. Thank you,CT. I voted Ned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-23-07 08:30 AM Response to Reply #44 |
55. Only a trace of snow in New Haven. I heard some birds yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-23-07 01:01 PM Response to Reply #16 |
59. Why was my comment unnecessary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
12. I don't think so. But the Senate is in gridlock anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
13. The only way out is death, resignation, or expulsion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalEsto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 05:01 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. No impeachment? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 06:58 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CK_John (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
18. No state can recall Federal officials only state officials. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senseandsensibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
20. Is there visable anger among the state's Dems at least? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CK_John (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 07:24 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. CT is one of the highest income states and navy ship building is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
21. He won't be in the Senate much longer, soon he will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bagrman (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
22. He's marched in lockstep with them all along, might as well make it official. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
23. Who in their right mind would trust the jackass voters of CT to get it right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 07:54 PM Response to Reply #23 |
33. Excuse me? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brer cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 10:15 PM Response to Reply #33 |
48. I'm not going to respond to that child and give him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 09:01 PM Response to Reply #23 |
40. Republics are the ones who voted for Joley Ho |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Theres-a (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 10:01 PM Response to Reply #23 |
46. Feh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
25. It shouldn't have even been legal for him to run after losing a primary election... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 08:45 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. Bingo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 08:58 PM Response to Reply #25 |
38. huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-23-07 11:07 AM Response to Reply #38 |
56. It's not complicated. He Lost his primary race. That should exclude him from the general... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ISUGRADIA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 09:59 PM Response to Reply #25 |
45. In MN he could not have done this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redstone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
37. We would if we could, but we can't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 11:13 PM Response to Reply #37 |
50. There is no recall process? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redstone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 11:55 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. No. None at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-23-07 12:12 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. That's just too sad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hyphenate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
47. GMTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-22-07 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
49. Joe's irrelevant in 18 months. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MzNov (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-23-07 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
53. Here's a link to some interesting data on CT recall proceedings, or lack thereof..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-23-07 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
58. Would the people of CT be smart enough to, if they could? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC