Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA leak case — have been taped over and are gone forever.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:19 AM
Original message
CIA leak case — have been taped over and are gone forever.
White House reused e-mail tapes By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer
11 minutes ago



WASHINGTON - The White House has acknowledged recycling its backup computer tapes of e-mail before October 2003, raising the possibility that many electronic messages — including those pertaining to the CIA leak case — have been taped over and are gone forever.

The disclosure came minutes before midnight Tuesday under a court-ordered deadline that forced the White House to reveal information it has previously refused to provide.

Among the e-mails that could be lost are messages swapped by any White House officials involved in discussions about leaking a CIA officer's identity to reporters.

Before October 2003, the White House recycled its backup tapes "consistent with industry best practices," according to a sworn statement by a White House aide.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080116/ap_on_go_pr_wh/white_house_e_mail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. they have erased everything.....criminal at best
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. I read WH response. Might not be that bad.
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 03:59 PM by unc70
It appears that everything "should" be archived since 2003. Before that, they might have less granularity of snapshots for earlier periods prior. Some email might be missing between those snapshots if it was sent and all copies everywhere deleted before the next retained snapshot.

Not enough information to really evaluate how big a problem this really is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ok, where are the Obstruction of Justice charges?
<sound of crickets>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. This will continue to be S.O.P. until someone goes to jail for destroying evidence and obstructing
justice.

There are laws prohibiting this, and those who are responsible must go to jail. period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. do you think Dem Leadership knew this long ago?
that would explain their discouraging lack of enthusiasm for the investigation.

Don't forget to wear your safety goggles against the concussion from the slap on the wrist the WH will get.

This will be who we are forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Holy shit.
I work in financial services. If I can justify every penny of a million-dollar payment I issued four years ago, then my audit department has broad powers of retribution. And excuses amounting to "the dog ate it" just don't pass muster.

You'd think that the Whitehouse would be held to a higher stander of transparency and disclosure than an anonymous bean-counter like me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. ok, let's think here. What other options do we have?
How about the backup tapes from the RNC? Remember the big flack over the WH using the RNC servers specifically to get around the retention system?

The other thing is...How does that WH email system work? Is it completely internal or does it go through some external servers? My guess is that it's connected to external serfvers somewhere BECAUSE if it were all intrnal, they wouldn't be able to send any emails outside of the WH!

There are also prosecutable charges here, IMO. As I understand it, WH records are to be retained FOREVER for historical purposes. THAT means, wether it's the industry standard or not, they weren't PERMITTED to recycle them....EVER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. They call a violation of the Presidential Records Act an "industry best practice"?
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 10:38 AM by leveymg
Most compliance attorneys would likely disagree. Points for creativity in legal interpretation. Just call it, the "18 million minute gap." :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. this is just a guess
But can't some of that be recovered anyway? I thought nothing was ever totally erased?

This was obviously obstruction and done on purpose but wouldn't it be appropriate to try to recover something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wait a dayum minute!!! Aren't they required BY LAW to preserve those communications!?!?!!!!
EW!!! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, but the Presidential Records Act has no teeth.
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 10:42 AM by leveymg
But, violating it does show criminal intent, which would go toward proving an OOJ charge.

See, Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978
Presidential Libraries Laws and Regulations Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978.
www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/laws/1978-act.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Their evasive behavior in a court of law ALSO shows intent.
When are these brutally corrupt criminals going to be appropriately charged and convicted and taken forever OUT of destroying this nation?

When?

This nation will fall before it can even begin on a path towards recovery if these tyrants aren't held accountable for at least some of their many MANY crimes against their own country and against humanity, in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. The legal scuttlebutt in DC is that charges won't be filed until January 2009
After that, the gloves come off. One member of the the DC Circuit already said he's getting ready for a long string of prosecutions.

Just make sure the GOP doesn't steal or void the next election. Vote, and make sure it counts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. I have no problem with that as long as the scuttlebutts have some control over the,...
,...scumbuckets' illegal activities FROM HERE FORTH.

See, that's where I have concern. The scumbuckets have gotten this far, without substantive limits imposed, and may go ahead and take their agenda further because they have nothing to lose, personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. That's why Bush lost his nuke priviledges, and the FBI, CIA and NSA are watching the neocons
Those who haven't been fired or indicted, that is.

It's called "removal in place", explained here: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/2/18/10343/6778
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. They assisted this regime. I find no comfort in the profferred explanation.
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 01:13 PM by sicksicksick_N_tired
The heads of those agencies generally serve a different creature from those cogs in their wheels. I suppose the cogs could be coordinating an effort to 'SAVE' democracy from tyranny,...but, somehow, I doubt that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Believe me, Dubya is no longer in charge of the Pentagon and CIA
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 01:42 PM by leveymg
He's a ceremonial fixture who's had his plug pulled. They didn't want to, but they had to.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. He was never in charge of ANYTHING. It's DARTH that's waged destruction,...
,...on the peoples' interests and this nation's health as a democracy (selfish, greedy scum-of-the-earth that he is and will be to the day he dies).

And that scumdweller still has his hands on the wheel, along with his BFEE bud, Bush Sr and their lot of power-brokers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Darth isn't even within the military Chain of Command
Rummy was, but he's gone. The "Crazy Cheney is in control of the White House and will call in B-52 air strikes with nuclear bunker-busters tomorrow" thing was a psywar ploy.

Didn't have the desired effect of provoking Iran into doing something stupid, so it's been dropped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
11. OOPS! Their bad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
12. Let's not forget that this administration makes up it's own laws!!
There ain't shit left!! Plain and simple. These people are the sneakiest of the sneaks, the slimiest of slime, and probably about the smartest bunch of MF'ers out there. They've got their tracks so covered that even a bloodhound couldn't find a clue.

That's my humble opinion, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
13. excuses excuses
sigh

always excuses

excuses for wrong doing
excuses for lack of accountability

nothing but excuses

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
14. Man these fascists are just SHAMELESS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
15. What about the hard drives? What about the people who RECEIVED emails from the WH?
Some highly trained computer tech surely knows how to retrieve the info from the hard drives...no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
17. "consistent with industry best practices,"
Since when has the Government been an industry? While private business may follow such practice, government does not...and I am sure they know that..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. private industry doesn't follow those practices
when required by law to archive content of that nature...

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
18. Dear WH, I've been in the computer business for 40 years and reusing backup tapes intended for
archival is not consistent with industry best practices, and in the areas of banking, education, health services, etc., would be a violation of federal laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. its violation of Federal Law
Its obvious
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
19. Recommended for evidence of yet another crime committed by this tyranny. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
22. Time for some more arrests
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 11:40 AM by sakabatou
Too bad it'll probably never happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
23. K&R! Damn Kpete, You Rock!
:yourock: :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
24. ok the tapes were taped over..how about those who recieved the emails...
couldn't many of those involved have their computers impounded and searched for emails they recieved from the white house?

does the court really care?? because if they did they would subpoena each and every person in the west wings personal computers!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
27. 18 1/2 minutes n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
28. And Republicans have the nerve to call the Clinton administration corrupt!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC