Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP:Democrats Seek to Revise 2002 War Authorization

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 09:53 PM
Original message
WP:Democrats Seek to Revise 2002 War Authorization
Senate Democratic leaders intend to unveil a plan next week to repeal the 2002 resolution authorizing the war in Iraq in favor of narrower authority that restricts the military's role and begins withdrawals of combat troops.

House Democrats have pulled back from efforts to link additional funding for the war to strict troop-readiness standards after the proposal came under withering fire from Republicans and from their party's own moderates. That strategy was championed by Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.) and endorsed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).

"If you strictly limit a commander's ability to rotate troops in and out of Iraq, that kind of inflexibility could put some missions and some troops at risk," said Rep. Chet Edwards (D-Tex.), who personally lodged his concerns with Murtha.

(snip)
"I've had enough of 'nonbinding,' " said Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), who is helping to draft the new Democratic proposal. The 2002 war resolution, he said, is an obvious target.

"The authorization that we gave the president back in 2002 is completely, completely outdated, inappropriate to what we're engaged in today," he said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/22/AR2007022201743.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. What A Fucking Mess
This is where triangulation lands us, every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Amen to that. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. that's the way the votes went.
Even if everyone in our majority voted in unison . . . I still don't see where they can do ANYTHING meaningful effectively without trying to form coalitions with willing republicans - outside of efforts like this one certain to be obstructed.

Triangulation seems like a throw-away term, used disparagingly against our hard-working legislators whenever there are political obstacles which prevent unilateral, partisan action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. And while you're at it, put in an addendum that prohibits attacking Iran
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why do I have the feeling that this isn't going anywhere?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. because it isn't
Edited on Thu Feb-22-07 10:40 PM by bigtree
it's confrontational by design

k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rydz777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. The swamp
All these Senate resolutions sink into the swamp. The only thing that will have any effect (and which Bush fears) is Murtha's actions on appropriations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC