|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Orwellian_Ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 01:28 PM Original message |
$20,000 dollars per hour for the last 2,000 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gilpo (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. 24*365*2000*20000=350400000000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 04:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. Yah, right order of magnitude. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. way off . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 01:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I didn't get that at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 02:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. He's only off by a factor of 10,000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 02:56 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. actually off by a factor of 1000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Umm, no. Wrong again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. well - 175,200,000 is wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 03:30 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. The lifetime of the U.S. is entirely irrelevant to the original question, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. then you are assuming there was a U.S.war budget for 2000 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. We're not talking about the average per year since the U.S. began. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 03:50 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. I do understand that . . . never mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 04:10 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Actually, it's not me, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. well - I think we are both wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 03:11 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I'm sorry, dude, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 03:13 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Fuzzy math. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 03:16 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. well - I am considering only 200 years of U.S. defense spending |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. You can consider whatever you want to, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. well thank you very much . . .I admitted to an error in the original post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. I want you to acknowledge the essential truth of the OP, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 04:11 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. well - actually the calculated amount is only about 55% or so of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Which makes perfect sense, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
3. Oh please, let's just put it on the middle income tax payer's tab and get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
5. They only paid me $79 a month when I (stupidly) joined up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
6. Way too little. That wouldn't even cover half the military budget for 2008. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XboxWarrior (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
26. Ya'll suck.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 05:04 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Current 2008 budget is about $600,000,000,000. Compare that to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-18-08 06:53 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. The OP wasn't talking about the entire military budget... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC