Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

wh Has No Comprehensive E-Mail Archive: System Used by Clinton (Under Court Order) Was Scrapped

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 09:18 AM
Original message
wh Has No Comprehensive E-Mail Archive: System Used by Clinton (Under Court Order) Was Scrapped
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 09:21 AM by babylonsister
White House Has No Comprehensive E-Mail Archive
System Used by Clinton Was Scrapped

By Elizabeth Williamson and Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, January 22, 2008; Page A03


For years, the Bush administration has relied on an inadequate archiving system for storing the millions of e-mails sent through White House servers, despite court orders and statutes requiring the preservation of such records, according to documents and technical experts.

President Bush's White House early on scrapped a custom archiving system that the Clinton administration had adopted under a federal court order. From 2001 to 2003, the Bush White House also recorded over computer backup tapes that provided a last line of defense for preserving e-mails, even though a similar practice landed the Clinton administration in legal trouble.

As a result, several years' worth of electronic communication may have been lost, potentially including e-mails documenting administration actions in the run-up to the Iraq war.

White House officials said last week that they have "no reason to believe" that any e-mails were deliberately destroyed or are missing. But over the past year, they have acknowledged problems with archiving, saving and finding e-mails dating from early in the administration until at least 2005.

The administration's e-mail policies have been repeatedly challenged by lawmakers and open-government groups, in congressional hearings and in court. Two groups, the National Security Archive and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, have accused the White House in lawsuits of violating the Federal Records Act because of what they say is its failure to preserve millions of e-mails, a charge the White House rejects.

more...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/21/AR2008012102070.html?hpid=moreheadlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. A backup system is not difficult to install and implement
and if I'm not mistaken, retention periods are part of the International Standards of Operation (ISO). at the very least for Disaster Recovery procedures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think the point is they didn't want the e-mails archived.
They didn't want a paper or electronic trail. Their scrapping this smacks of a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Of course its a FED CRIME,,,but Cheney said "GO FK YRSLF"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. So what if it is a crime? Who will do anything?
They have been give carte blanc to commit any crimes they wish with full knowledge they will never be held accountable.. Accountability is "Off the Table"....And the election coming up will not change that fact. The same Democrats that are there now will stay there and they will use their re-election as proof that America doesn't want Republicans held accountable..America is a Criminal enterprise from top to bottom..What we need is more guns....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Imagine that,
criminals acting like criminals. I'm sure it ws just an accident though. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. so what is going into bush`s presidential library?
hmmmm...."the pet goat"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Good point. If he's deleting everything w/o backup, why even bother
with a library?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Glorioski, Sandy!
It's almost like they didn't want to preserve a record of their e-mails! But that can't be true, because George W. Bush, the kind of guy you want to have a beer with, said that he was going to restore honor and integrity to the White House, now that the grown-ups were back in charge.

You don't suppose . . . :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. LOL! I DO suppose! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's all Clinton's fault.
See, if he didn't have that cort ordered "custom archiving system" installed, then they wouldn't had to rip it all out in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. when do we eat, nancy please set the damn table before they burn the damn thing up
so you don't/won't have one to set. damn girl get off your freaking ask and dooo something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
11. "Smirk." - Commander AWOL
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 10:54 AM by SpiralHawk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. "Sneer." - Dickie "Five Military Deferments" Cheney
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 10:55 AM by SpiralHawk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
13. I don't know what all the complaining is about here.
I mean he only did the same thing as he did to FEMA............

Get rid of something of Clinton's that worked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yup. It seems he did learn something while destroying our country. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. No use rejecting or denying what is factually OBVIOUS, ya' criminals!!!
The White House, IN FACT, FAILED TO PRESERVE EMAILS. Rejecting or denying that fact is simply an act of falsehood, again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC