Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Drought May Force Some Nuke Plants To Shut Down

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 04:03 PM
Original message
Drought May Force Some Nuke Plants To Shut Down


LAKE NORMAN, N.C. (AP) ― Nuclear reactors across the Southeast could be forced to throttle back or temporarily shut down later this year because drought is drying up the rivers and lakes that supply power plants with the awesome amounts of cooling water they need to operate.

Utility officials say such shutdowns probably wouldn't result in blackouts. But they could lead to shockingly higher electric bills for millions of Southerners, because the region's utilities could be forced to buy expensive replacement power from other energy companies.

Already, there has been one brief, drought-related shutdown, at a reactor in Alabama over the summer.

"Water is the nuclear industry's Achilles' heel," said Jim Warren, executive director of N.C. Waste Awareness and Reduction Network, an environmental group critical of nuclear power. "You need a lot of water to operate nuclear plants." He added: "This is becoming a crisis."
*snip*

http://wjz.com/national/drought.nuclear.reactor.2.636164.html



With all the problems of nuclear energy this one never crossed my mind. It should have since I know how much water they use and how dependent they are on water since I am less than 10 miles from a plant and hear about the water thing a lot. Add it to the list of why it is not the answer.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. It is not the answer. It creates more problems than energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. They need to get Palo Verde's system
Due to its location in the Arizona desert, Palo Verde is the only nuclear generating facility in the world that is not located adjacent to a large body of water. Instead, it uses treated sewage from several nearby municipalities to meet its cooling water needs, recycling 20 billion US gallons (76,000,000 m³) of wastewater each year. At the nuclear plant site, the wastewater is further treated and stored in an 80 acre (324,000 m²) reservoir for use in the plant's cooling towers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palo_Verde_Nuclear_Generating_Station
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Which problems in particular?
The biggest problem is getting them built -- big business' risk-aversion requires enormous up-front capitalization of reactors.

And we could, in fact, build nuclear reactors that don't require water cooling, or use closed-cycle cooling.

As for "the answer", there may be none. I think the problem is that human civilization has exceeded the Earth's carrying capacity, and it will take longer for us to adapt to that than we have time for. Nukes or no, we are in for a rough ride.

There actually is an Answer ... hard work, heavy investment, and world-wide dedication to building a better civilization. Any wagers on that one?

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC