Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House in panic over Sibel Edmonds?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lukery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:22 PM
Original message
White House in panic over Sibel Edmonds?
Sixteen days after the UK Times' published a blockbuster article, For sale: West’s deadly nuclear secrets, about how certain top US government officials were enabling Turkish and Israeli interests in supplying the nuclear black market, President Bush quietly announced on Tuesday that he wants Congress to approve sales of nuclear technology to Turkey.

Is this a reaction to the Times article? It sure looks like it. I wouldn't be surprised if we soon start hearing about retroactive immunity for the guilty parties, just as we are seeing in the illegal spying case currently in the Senate.

As always happens in this case, the silence in the US media is deafening.

Two years ago, Bush's efforts to sell nuclear technology prompted much “ indignation and furor," but not a single major US media outlet has yet reported the proposed deal with Turkey. Agence France-Presse put out a report on its wires which has been picked up around the world, but that's about it.

The White House press release says that Bill Clinton agreed to the deal in 2000:
However, immediately after signature, U.S. agencies received information that called into question the conclusions that had been drawn in the required NPAS (Nuclear Proliferation Assessment Statement) and the original classified annex, specifically, information implicating Turkish private entities in certain activities directly relating to nuclear proliferation. Consequently, the Agreement was not submitted to the Congress and the executive branch undertook a review of the NPAS evaluation.


It would certainly be interesting to know which "Turkish private entitities" Bush is referring to here. If he had said "Turkish private companies" instead, we could be comfortable in presuming that he was referring to the two named Turkish companies involved in A.Q. Khan's network, EKA and ETI Elektroteknik The phrase "entities" on the other hand is broader, and could very well include the American Turkish Council, the 'entity' named in the Times article as well as other articles about Sibel Edmonds case.

The timing here is also interesting; "immediately after" Clinton approved the deal in July 2000, US agencies became aware of this Turkish involvement in the AQ Khan network. This was fully three years before the Khan network was officially exposed.

The White House press release continues with some curiously descriptive narrative:
"My Administration has completed the NPAS review as well as an evaluation of actions taken by the Turkish government to address the proliferation activities of certain Turkish entities (once officials of the U.S. Government brought them to the Turkish government's attention)."


Given that the entire press release is basically written in 'legalese', this unnecessary parenthetical aside stands out like a sore thumb. I wonder who injected this statement into the announcement, and why. It sure looks like butt-covering to me, given the latest revelations in the Times.

The phrase 'once officials...' also appears to be a curious formulation. I'm not overly familiar with presidential statements and US government protocols, but I would imagine that "Agencies" or "Departments" would normally communicate with foreign governments on such important matters, and I would imagine that presidential statements would normally refer to such agencies, rather than 'officials.' Perhaps I'm wrong, and perhaps this is common practice, but it sure looks like an attempt to exonerate certain individuals such as Marc Grossman who was accused of some very serious crimes in the Times article.

Who were these officials? How, when, and in what format, did they bring this information to the Turkish government? I'd like to see the official communication, please.

And what, exactly, has the Turkish government done to 'address these proliferation activities'? We know that ETA and EKI continue to operate, and as far as I know haven't been penalized. The press release says that this information is all classified.

Summary
It appears as though certain administration officials have been illegally supplying the Turkish nuclear program for years, and now that they've been publicly outed, the Bush administration will simply make the entire program legal, just as they are trying to do with the illegal spying.

Congress has 90 days to amend or block this legislation, otherwise it automatically becomes law.

We need public open hearings to determine which officials have been supplying the nuclear black market before this becomes law.

-------------
Cross posted at Let Sibel Edmonds Speak

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catbird Donating Member (633 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. and can we count on the Dems to stop it? Ha. Silly me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Beat me to it.
Where are the leaders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
100. Self delete
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 12:35 PM by AikidoSoul
posted it on wrong thread!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
66. Paging Nancy Pelosi. Nancy Pelosi please pick up the white courtesy phone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #66
90. And you are doing __________ what about it? Letters, funding, ...?
-> ______________________________ <-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #90
99. Don't hold me to a higher standard.
She's the one who's the elected official here. But go ahead and give her a pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryRN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frog92969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Parry
Consortium News is on the job, republishing an old piece by Martin Lee

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2008/012408a.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. OMG! I did not know about the Banco Ambrosiano connection.
I read "In God's Name" some time ago. Maybe I need to go back and re-read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. I had not realized the Vatican was involved
I need to read more about this part of the corruption.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
46. SMOM n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
94. the Vatican are the money men
able to do what they want and no army to protect them or a populace to worry about and yet help rule the world


Oh ya quite a place
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
86. If Berlusconi is tied into this, now might be the time to point it out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #86
96. Wasn't there suspected Italian involvement in the forged Niger documents...
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 07:18 PM by calipendence
... that was what helped the Bushies cook the books on the Yellowcake stuff that became related to the Valerie Plame/Brewster Jennings scandal? And of course recent London Times article links the Plame/Brewster Jennings scandal with what Sibel Edmonds knows too. So it wouldn't be too surprising that he's linked to this as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #96
97. A conspiracy of right-wing intelligence factions...

including possible players previously involved in Iran/Contra. Iran/Contra gave birth to a money laundering platform that allowed drug trafficking and illegal arms trade to occur behind the backs of the "white hats". Look into the Pollard case to see how this platform allowed nuclear secrets to be released previously, via right-wing Israeli intermediaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. urgh! ack! sputter...
rrrrrrrrrrrRRRRRRRRRRRRRrrrrRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRrrrrrrrrr...........

settling down now...

those bastards.

:grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. This looks familiar.
When they get caught doing something in secret, they then do it in broad daylight to suggest it isn't illegal to begin with. Just change the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. Changing the rules is pretty much the MO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. KNPnta
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. Probably not
They know they will not be held accountable for there is no meaningful force to hold their feet to the fire. Can we get to that?

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks, lukery, for your diligence. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StateSecrets Donating Member (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. And thanks to Ms. Edmonds for her courage and willingness to stand up for the truth. n/t
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 11:08 PM by antigop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #14
27. Thank you Ms. Secrets!
And Luke too. American heroes the both of you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. I hope they are and if Congress protects them they need
to go to jail too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #16
31. We'll see how much protection Congress grants.
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 01:32 AM by mmonk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
18. and what will reid and pelosi do?
Kick and rank!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. nothing.
simple question, simple answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. Excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
22. K&R, Cohen Group and Lockheed Martin tied up in this?

"The Cohen Group is an excellent case, illustrating the futility of FARA, since the firm does not have to be registered. They can claim that Turkey is not their ‘direct’ client; they can argue that they are not getting paid ‘directly’ by the government of Turkey or any other foreign entity or government. They certainly can; no matter that Grossman receives hundreds of thousands of dollars from a dubious Turkish company. Does Cohen discount Grossman’s Vice Chairmanship salary accordingly? No matter that half a million dollars per year from their client Lockheed Martin is mainly for services provided to Turkey, and having the group’s second chairman serve on Lockheed’s board is another way to get around all restrictions. The incestuous relationship twists and turns: The Cohen Group on the board of ATC, The Cohen Group a paying member client of ATC, The Cohen Group as Lockheed’s lobbyist, Cohen’s men on the board of Lockheed, Lockheed on the board of ATC, Lockheed also a paying client of ATC…How is your head; spinning yet?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. yes and yes
grossman is ViceChairman at Cohen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
25. Good work keeping us posted
You have the most in depth knowledge on this of anyone.

K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xiamiam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
26. seems the reason its so hard to get traction is the complicity of so many dems and repubs..
a truly bipartisan effort to screw our country..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. And nowhere to turn without a press that serves as a fourth estate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
28. K&R
Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
30. SSDD for this mal-administration...
K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
32. Dana Priest In WaPo live online today
"Crestwood, N.Y.: Here's the shortest question you'll ever get: Sibel Edmonds?

Dana Priest: And the shortest answer: worth following"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2008/01/21/DI2008012101585.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Yes.
Saw that on my Google alerts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. hmmmm
i didnt get that one.

I have a GoogleNews alert for "Sibel Edmonds" and it didnt come through. What is your search term?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Just "Sibel Edmonds"
Of course I didn't get the Parry one until a few minutes ago. Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. On rechecking, it wasn't by Google alert.
I guess it when I was scanning information earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #33
69. Self delete - posted wrong spot
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 12:41 PM by Junkdrawer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #69
75. No problem. This thread gets a kick out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
34. Super interesting. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
37. Just posted another thread about a recent article from McClatchey on the "superdollar plot"...
... that was originally the Bush administration pointing to North Korea being responsible for a lot of super high quality counterfeit U.S. currency that lead to us getting newer currency recently.

A while back a German paper did research and conjectured that the quality of this was too high for North Korea to have done it and speculated that it might have been done by the CIA to help fund black ops out from under the scrutiny of congress.

I have a thread here that I just started talking about a newer McClatchy Bureau story that picked up on the German newspaper story and comes to similar conclusions. I wonder if it is tied in with the whole mess that Sibel is looking at too. As I have said here in other threads, I have wondered also if folks like Thomas Kontogiannis who was "secretly" sentenced for money laundering crimes and treated very "nicely", wasn't tied into this scheme too if it was real.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=2762230&mesg_id=2762230

Might bear looking into where Sibel and others here think that money funding these bribery situations was coming from, and if they might be tied together somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #37
50. Without a doubt, anybody that has watched the trajectory of this certain brand of spooks can see it
These bastards think the world is here to serve them. Inflicting crime waves and starving out their own countries people. The only thing it seems one should suspect is more treachery. The propensity seems to suggest they next will attempt to give virtue and dignify treason and murder. Like after all them bringing back dark age practice of torture to solve problems gives insight to how foolish and drunk with contempt they have become. One should ponder, what would one put below them knowing the deeds they have done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
39. A K&R to read when I'm awake. Thank you for your work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
40. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
41. morning kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
42. They might have to flee to Peru before their term is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #42
51. Or Paraguay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
43. Congress has 90 days to amend or block this legislation
everyone who thinks congress will block/amend raise your hands...

:sarcasm: whatsamatta witchu? dontcha know sterioids in baseball more important? you hates baseball or sumpin? /end :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynnertic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #43
55. i missed something- how come they have 90 days to amend or block?
doesn't congress set its own schedule?

Thanks for the help...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. not sure... anyone know????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
44. Very important.
Nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norrin Radd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
45. k+r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
47. k & r to help bring down the republicon traitors to America
for sure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
48. K & R. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtLiberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
49. K & R
!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
52. Let's keep this at the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
53. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
54. Write to your newspaper and give them links and ask when they will
start reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FATCATs Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
57. Why would they panic ?
Its not as though they have anything to fear from our Democratic Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #57
60. It's up to us to make Congress have something to fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gilpo Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #57
74. Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FATCATs Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #74
78. Thanks for the welcome gilpo
But I've been here awhile, I wanted my old screen name but they said
to just re-register. I messed it up when I signed up, It sits there like a rock
and now nobody can use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
58. Its Bill Clinton's idea.
Just when will it be Smirky's?

Amazing how Bill is still blamed for everything by the Repiggies.

Holy sheet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #58
65. Just remember...
it was Clinton who appointed Marc Grossman as ambassador of Turkey. And it was under Clinton when the FBI was wiretapping Marc Grossman. I'd like to see more discussion about whether he knew his Turkish ambassador was being wiretapped for suspected espionage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #65
77. Now THAT would be fascinating to know
How can it be investigated? If you run into Bill during this primary season, why not just ask him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #77
84. LOL
I'll be sure and do that. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
59. They shouldn't be "in panic." They should be "in prison." (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
61. Kick & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
62. Up
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
63. Contact the Presidential campaigns

And, tell them to discuss this....

And, if they don't come out publicly against it. You will NOT vote for them. This needs huge media attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #63
95. Second that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
64. K and R
Now can we Impeach him? Selling nuke crap to Turkey sounds like an impeachable offense, doesn't it? Wake up Conyers! Stop listening to Fancy Nancy and IMPEACH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
67. SSDD
And speaking of "same shit, different day," it is safe to assume that the Dems in Congress are already lining up to kiss Bush's butt yet again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. They have to be made aware of what they are doing.
Contact your representatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FATCATs Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #67
79. Here, Here, Dude
When is enough enough. Its like we LOST the Congresional Elections

Jebus H Christmas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stubtoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
70. Man, lukery, you sure do a great job on these posts.
So well researched and annotated with pertinent links. I noticed that all the news sources (your google link) about this are foreign, mostly Turkish. Media silence in US outlets speaks volumes.

Thanks for the continuing great work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
71. Got caught committing a crime? No problem: get Congress to make it legal!
Retroactively, even.

Oh, your party isn't in power?

No problem. Buy off that party's leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
72. The documentary "Kill The Messenger" is posted in political videos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Torn_Scorned_Ignored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
73. Marc Grossman to Testify in House on Wednesday
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3151917

ATTN DC Bloggers/Media: Marc Grossman to Testify in House on Wednesday
Opportunity for Indy Media to Ask Questions, Since U.S. MSM Won't!

Just in...Marc Grossman, who has been named in the Sibel Edmonds case as allegedly receiving bribes from Turkish and Israeli agents, and warning the Turkish Embassy to stay away from Valerie Plame Wilson's "Brewster Jennings" front company, will be testifying tomorrow morning (Wed.) before a sub-committee of Henry Waxman's House Oversight committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
76. Panic?
Why would Bush panic? He is the king. The emperor. Complete with an empress who sits in charge of Congress. Protecting him.

When Democrats protect the Republicans, there is no longer a democracy. And Nancy Pelosi has made it quite clear that we are no longer a democracy. Her agenda is to use the moral corruption of the Republicans to elect more Democrats. Democrats like her?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
80. Don't expect Tweety or Blitzer or the powdered faces on the Networks to touch this one--too much
substance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #80
82. They'd probably need to devote a whole hour to it
can't do that - there could be breaking Britney or Paris news that day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FATCATs Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
81. Tell ya what
I live in the Illinois 16th. and we have this Manzullo Repug for life.
But I wouldn't trade him for a Pelosi Democrat, No Way.

If they want to continue to screw things up they can do it in their own names
Not in the name of Democrats, This is the party that used to stand up to these thugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
83. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, lukery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
85. Perhaps Turkey is also in a panic?
Check out this Kurdish blogger's story about some recent "arrests" in Turkey now too that seem to be timed conveniently after Sibel's allegations of their wrongdoing.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=2765825&mesg_id=2765825
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
santamargarita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
87. I said that these fascist pigs would try this days ago...
...blame it on Clinton or make a retroactive law to once again cover the smirking monkey's criminal ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
88. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
89. new post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
westcor Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
91. these guys are amazing
I wish i could break the law, then go back and make it legal after the fact.. I am so sick of this SHIT, the fact this country is still up and running is shocking to say the least, no body and I mean no body has respect for the US, and its cause of stuff like this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
92. If they're not in a panic, they should be. BUSH ENABLING NUCLEAR TERRORISM = TREASON. (n/t).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
93. Pandoras box is open... and another rec makes 169.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
98. Kickkeepitup
Andrecommend :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC