|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 10:55 PM Original message |
OMG. I agree with Bush on one thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yes, but you don't know his definition of "pork barrel" ... therein lies the rub. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 11:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. I think Obama agrees. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 11:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. It doesn't matter what his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 11:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. He also does not have the right to issue Executive orders to that effect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 11:27 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. How so? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 11:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Because it is an abuse of the EO; effectively using it as a line item veto. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 11:54 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. I wish we had a line item veto. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 11:55 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I am glad that we don't. And it is definitely unconstitutional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. Problem is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 11:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Actually, the REAL problem is that he's using an executive order to change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-29-08 07:40 PM Response to Reply #2 |
17. If the spending |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-29-08 07:45 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. congress appropriates money not the president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 11:44 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. But it should be voted on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
3. Umm, last I checked Bushmaster considers the SCHIP bill for children's health care pork n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 11:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. Bingo, why he vetoed it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lint Head (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
6. Bush can go to hell. he is illegitimate and should immediately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 11:07 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Now there's an intelligent response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
11. You realize pork barrel HAS TO BE APPROVED by Congress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libodem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 11:33 PM Response to Original message |
14. I don't agree with him on anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 08:03 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC