Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

**** Official Mukasey testimony before Senate Judiciary Committee #4 ****

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:44 PM
Original message
**** Official Mukasey testimony before Senate Judiciary Committee #4 ****
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 01:48 PM by L. Coyote
After lunch testimony.

http://www.c-span.org/watch/cs_cspan_wm.asp?Cat=TV&Code=CS

1) http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=2790819&mesg_id=2790819

2) http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=2791095&mesg_id=2791095


*** Official Senate Judiciary DOJ Hearing- #3 ***
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2791447
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. War crimes, torture, Presidential crimes, taking a back seat to Edwards announcement here on DU?
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 01:52 PM by L. Coyote
Seems like it!

"Torture unlawful"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm still here. I just don't know how much more I can take
I've had it. Unless something gives soon...I'm done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for the new thread!. .They are still re-running the earlier session
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canoeist52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Im watching
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. OMG! Specter nailing Bush on crimes. Mukasey evasive and equivocal.
Did I just hear Arlen calling Bush's acts clear violations of the law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. He was pretty tough this morning....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. VIDEOS of the Mukasey Hearing: CIA Tapes Investigation May Cover Interrogation Techniques
VIDEOS of the Mukasey Hearing: CIA Tapes Investigation May Cover Interrogation Techniques
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2791520

The current C-Span is rerunning, right? I'm in listen mode, at 24 Kbps!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. They should have started again by now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is where I tuned in this morning. When is lunch over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. 2 PM ET, supposedly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. I hope everyone watches the Kennedy/Mukasey clips
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. I posted 4 on our Political Video page. Start here: & they are BACK.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x88971
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. Back now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerpetuallyDazed Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. Am I missing something? Please, can someone explain to me how robbing a bank is NOT stealing??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Shshs!!! We can all rob banks now
I know, though...amazing isn't it?

He's so bent on protecting war crimes, he would say something like that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Remember, you'll need to donate to the RNC and have some high-paid lobbyists first!
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 02:14 PM by L. Coyote
You need money $$$$$ to steal $$$$$ money :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. LOL!!! I knew there had to be a catch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. I wonder what we've missed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. I hope someone has the courage and integrity to ask him about Padilla
and his ruling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. During the break, the call-in period
It seemed to me that pretty much every call (cept the last bonehead one -- Texan defends using torture because he was in WWII and he saw/participated in(?) torture in the South Pacific, and said it was necessary -- fucker!) anyway, whether caller from dem/repub/indy line, they were all disgusted by today's hearing! I was surprised. Just highlighted to me how people who watch cspan, and are actually aware of what is happening, as opposed to what fox/msnbc/cnn tells them, realize what a disaster this all is. That, at least, gave me a little bit of hope. Not much, but a little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
33. i noticed the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. Leahy says the FISA legis is why people are missing.. Cornyn up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. This is one slimy looking sob...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
20. About moving the FOIA to Justice.. he has reservations....(so does everyone)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
22. Corny of FISA reform... wants no sunset on revision-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. He's being anecdotal...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. some 10 hour "fisa delay". . cannot actually be true... they can go back
and get approval retroactively..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
24. PLEASE rec this up IF you want to IMPEACH someone! Hee hee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I guess we'll find out if there's anyone else out there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
38. Nominated but I'm still devastated
As far as impeachment goes, they can still impeach them in 2009 but
I don't think we are gonna see it.

Hopefully something will come out
the Hague and the International community
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
27. This is also a highly rehearsed interchange. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. Fully-scripted Rs is why taxpayers pay for the WH Political Affairs Office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
29. Corny giving cover to waterboarding non-answers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. Yeah he was
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
30. AG as "corporate counsel". . Ooo good for him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. this is Whitehouse up now. .I LOVE him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canadianbeaver Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
31. Feed the cube rats please......n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #31
44. I forget we are doing a public service. Waterboarding, waterboarding,....
Q. "Where is the absense of concrete circumstances in the events of the past?"

A. "My current evaluation of the statute, if there is one, ....."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canadianbeaver Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #44
64. Thanks.....
totally appreciate this service....you all rock!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
54. It's still a re-run of this mornings session
But the easiest way to imagine what is happening, is to remember Gonzalez testifying, and just cut Mukasey's face and paste it on and you'll have today's hearing.

He is NO DIFFERENT from Gonzo, and DAMN those dems who confirmed him thinking he would be!!!

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
37. Whitehouse is asking why there are no prosecutions for torture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
39. You ARE the sole prosecuting authority, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
40. In what way is there an "absence of concrete facts?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
41. He's trying to claim he's not a "coporate counsel" ??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:20 PM
Original message
Whitehouse exposed Mukasey for the liar he is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
42. Whitehouse is tough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
43. In other words... I was only following orders is ok then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. "I had authorization, therefor I'm immune from prosecution"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. Yes, this is the Nuremburg defense. Or at least it would be if the GOP were Nazis
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
46. Is he under oath? He told a whopper
On novam network news, they played a clip of him saying "Waterboarding is not now, nor are there any plans for it to be, part of the program", so he's not going to comment on its legality. This is a bald-faced lie. Can he be prosecuted for perjury?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
47. He has no indication that there was an unauthorized authorization?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #47
61. Whew! And befoe, he wasn't authorized to discuss authorizing torture and who authorized what author
izations. Hey, no authors here, move on. :rofl:

So, who is the supreme authority?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
48. Oooh, Sheldon just called Mukasey a Good German
snap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
50. Why are there no prosecutions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
51. Is there evidence of a "destruction"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
52. This is as historical as the Watergate Hearings were, it seems just now.
Why isn't there an investigation ....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #52
66. And the media could give a sh*t. It seems we have accepted that our Government is corrupt?
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #66
74. It is all on film for later digestion, while the focus is on Edwards in NOLA.
The highlights here are just astounding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
53. ::Solly engages in some virtual smacking::
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
55. If the reason you're giving us for investigating the tape destruction
is ok why arent you investigating the torture?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
56. Muk is trying mightily to squirm out of an OBVIOUS inconsistency
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
57. Schumer up. . . major Muk supporter during confirmation..
Let's see if he asks decent questions...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
58. Issues on executive power & torture.. we differ... I thought you MIGHT rise
to the occasion... I am not surprised, but I am dissappointed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
59. Schumer " you're the kind of AG I expected when I voted to confirm" He's bragging
about confirming this piece of shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #59
63. Spare me, Schumer... if you gave a damn, you would have never voted for this piece of shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
60. Since you personally find it repugnant.. do you support the banning of it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. (waterboarding)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
65. He won't say if he THINKS it should be outlawed!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
67. "that's not up to your usual standard of answer"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
68. He is REFUSING to answer!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
69. "The question of whether waterboarding should be outlawed.." Muk
OMG!

Dear Mr. AG.

It is illegal!
As in "war crime."

Sincerely

All US Coyotes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
70. "You SAID it was repugnant.. not in "some circumstance"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
71. Muthafuck. Waterboarding is ALREADY outlawed
and fuck his mock outrage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #71
76. Fuck everyone pretending that waterboarding isn't already outlawed
It's that kind of bullshit that is enabling war criminals to get away with their crimes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #71
82. The Emporer said "Up is Down" and nothing has been the same since. = Bush tortured!
Only Bush could "authorize" certain conduct, so guess where all this leads.

Since Bush is the culpable dude, his AG has to now accept up as down = waterboarding cannot be a crime if Bush did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
72. When I was a judge, I was not a "settling judge". . i.e. a judge with no judgements!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
73. Spectre up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #73
75. talking about confirming Bradbury. . . he's for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
77. I wrote to you last November re McNulty memorandum (?)
and something about the shield for reporters..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #77
91. Corporate fraud cases and how CEOs stay out of jail.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x877011#885015

One of the scandalous aspects of the McNulty memo is that people like Carol Lam could no longer make their own calls on initiating corporate fraud prosecutions. McNulty moved that authority to his own desk only, disabling ALL USAs in the nation from bring cases against Bush buddies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
78. I usually like Schumer, but after his confirmation of this ass
I've lost a lot of respect, and while he appears to be trying to appear "tough" I really dispise the smirk he's sporting.

Schumer, you did this to us, too. Don't act all smug now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #78
81. I agree and I have a feeling I know why Schumer promoted this
scum and it ain't pretty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #78
85. Schumer not only
supported Mukasey but went way beyond what a Senator from the other side of the isle would normally do (IMO) to get this clown confirmed. I found that very strange to say the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
79. complaining about the jailing of Judith Miller
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
80. McNulty memorandum is a "client privilege" issue...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
83. How can you justify DOJ's conduct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
84. "I don't condone ANYONE to waiver atty/client priv.. . "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
86. I hope someone can explain this part to me later. . annab.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #86
88. It's a way to waste time and divert attention from today's matter n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
87. Specter was tough this morning. Must have gotten a memo during lunch.
What the hell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
89. Spectre on FBI's interest in the subprime mess...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
90. ABOUT THE CONTEMPT CITATIONS (Meiers, Rove)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
92. about their not taking the oath... no transcripts...( Spec. says indespensible)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
93. Will you be willingto revisit this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #93
95. Let me guess:
"Let me get back to you on this"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
94. Muk says no. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:49 PM
Original message
This is going to make my head explode. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #94
98. This is going to make my head explode. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #94
99. This is going to make my head explode. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
96. HOLY SHIT?? Long standing tradition AGAINST a transcript??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
97. "I don't know that"
what a fucking jackass. unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
100. This is an astounding answer....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
101. Leahy says "coverup"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #101
103. I like the way
he said cover up as his first thought and also his second thought as well, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
102. Can we at least impeach this piece of garbage?
Maybe he has a dog we can impeach? Maybe that would be easier and won't cost anyone votes or make them look weak on terror (barf) Can we at least take that much of a stand against war crimes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #102
106. honestly, how did he EVER get confirmed?
he's as bad as Gonzo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
104. Why are CEOs exempt from prosecution in corporate fraud cases? Where does immunity come from?
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 02:52 PM by L. Coyote
Good questions. Well, Arlen, the CEOs are friends of Bush ... and the ones claiming Executive privilege are friends of Bush too!

Send the RNC $10,000 and you can be a friend of Bush too. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
105. NEW THREAD UP!!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2792473
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
107. K&R We have to keep this out there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC