Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why social conservatives will support Romney and why Romney will win the nomination

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 09:02 PM
Original message
Why social conservatives will support Romney and why Romney will win the nomination
Edited on Sat Feb-24-07 09:03 PM by Proud2BAmurkin
http://myclob.pbwiki.com/James%20Bopp%20Jr%20on%20Mitt%20Romney

Why social conservatives should support Mitt Romney for president.

By James Bopp Jr.

Yet how is the sincerity of a conversion to be measured? There are two salient considerations in this regard: first, some defining moment that prompted a change of heart; second, the fact that deeds speak louder than words. Romney’s conversion exhibits both. First, Romney has had a life-changing event. It was when he was governor and researchers were proposing embryonic cloning at Harvard. As he recounts it, one of the researchers said that there “wasn’t a moral issue, because . . . they destroy the embryos at 14 days.” Romney said that “it struck me that we have so cheapened the value of human life in this country through our Roe v. Wade decision that someone could think that there is no moral issue to have racks and racks of living human embryos and then destroying them at 14 days.”

This was not a trivial matter for Romney and his family. As he told the New York Times at the time, “My wife has MS and we would love for there to be a cure for her disease and for the diseases of others. But there is an ethical boundary that should not be crossed.”

And Romney, as governor, acted on these convictions. He vetoed an embryonic cloning bill; he vetoed a bill that would allow the “morning after pill” to be acquired without a prescription on the grounds that it is an abortifacient; he vetoed legislation which would have redefined Massachusetts longstanding definition of the beginning of human life from fertilization to implantation; and he fought to promote abstinence education in the classroom. One should not underestimate the tremendous political price that Governor Romney paid in Massachusetts for these acts. Both conviction and courage are necessary for effective pro-life leadership, and Romney, in office, displayed both.

These actions as governor have lead leaders of the most important social conservative groups in Massachusetts, including Massachusetts Citizens for Life, Massachusetts Family Institute, and the Knights of Columbus, to observe that, while previous comments by Romney “are, taken by themselves, obviously worrisome to social conservatives including ourselves, they do not dovetail with the actions of Governor Romney from 2003 until now — and those actions positively and demonstrably impacted the social climate of Massachusetts.” They conclude that Romney “demonstrated his solid social conservative credentials by undertaking” these actions, and has therefore “proven that he shares our values, as well as our determination to protect them.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Anointed by Jeb
which is how the Bush dynasty must designate nowadays since Junior has tanked. You can trump up those arguments for any brick in the road as far as I and they are concerned. The only real choice is the GOP establishment unless it is split- and it is not yet. You only have people who despair of Bush's nod and those who think they can weasel in or what the Bush's really want- a safe schlump totally and guilelessly dependent on them. One should better note WHY Bushes have not helped and have back-stabbed Guiliani and McCain and why they cannot be chosen for those reasons.

The other GOP wannabes are too weakened by corruption or extremism, epidemic in the Bush dynasty, to mount a serious challenge to the system. They can only hope it disappears, but it will not without the leadership they by nature cannot possibly attempt. Of course anyone attempting it could be easily brought down because of the Catch-22 by which Bush rallies the trapped exploiters of his mess.

And the Dems hope that the GOP will muster some responsibility or sense of self-survival for impeachment! More than the usual GOP tripe, the Bush dominated selection system demonstrates the octopus stranglehold not one of them can even imagine trying to escape. It is all based on the trap of long held lies all the GOP have committed themselves to in every core voting group and in every issue. Nor is their primary opportunity even partly endowed with the opportunity for a popular revolt that cannot gel except as rage, truculence and flight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyWeasel Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. thats good. he will be killed in the general electon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Whoever gets the nomination will have the support of the...
Edited on Sat Feb-24-07 09:57 PM by AX10
vast majority of Republicans. They have no principle and want power at any cost.

I agree that Romney will be beaten, but we will have to fight to the hilt regardless of who the nominee is. The Right Wing echo chamber is hard at work and the MSM is waiting for them to give the go ahead to anoint the GOP nominee the next President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC