Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Richard Armitage: Pre-9/11 Powell pushed for Iraq sanctions - some in admin feared it would work

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:05 PM
Original message
Richard Armitage: Pre-9/11 Powell pushed for Iraq sanctions - some in admin feared it would work

http://www.stanfordreview.org/Archive/Volume_XL/Issue_3/News/news2.shtml

ONLINE EXCLUSIVE: Interview with Richard Armitage

<snip>

SR: How hard did you and Colin Powell—the media’s “realists”—try to convince the president?


RA: We thought we had convinced the president. Prior to 9/11, Secretary Powell was able, over the objections of many in the administration, to get smart sanctions on Iraq. The reason, I think, some in the administration didn’t want this is they were afraid it would work. But then 9/11 came along and kind of shuffled the deck again. We went back as hard as we could to avoid war, not to oppose the war…It was not that Powell or I opposed the war; we both tried to avoid it. And that’s why Powell prevailed over the president in September of ‘02 to go back to the United Nations and announce that he would seek another Security Council resolution. And the president did that and, after, the secretary told him that if Saddam Hussein accedes this resolution, there is no war, there’s no military action. The president said he understood. You don’t think that was a fight? It was a horrible fight.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sanctions for nonexistent WMD?
Colin Powell is scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R. I suspect the audience at Stanford already knew this,
but I'm glad to hear someone actually say it. And Pelosi should act on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. "But then 9/11 came along and kind of shuffled the deck again"
interesting statment... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. ...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PRETZEL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. The Richard Armitage Comedy Show,
SR: David Walker, comptroller of the United States, compared the United States to the Roman Empire last year, suggesting we were on an “unsustainable” path in many respects, and that we should remember that Rome eventually fell. Do you buy this?

RA: Where we’re different from the Roman Empire and where Walker didn’t give us credit is that we have a transparent open system of changing our leaders and trying to make them accountable to the people. And when we have fiscal irresponsibility and all this, the leaders are held accountable. So, these are all things that are different from the Roman Empire and they are significant differences. And it’s why I thought it was interesting, and you can get overextended…but these are matters that have to be resolved or that can be resolved by a transparent process called elections and governance. So it’s a major difference…


Transparent my ass.....................................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. FLIP-FLOP REMINDER!
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 09:42 AM by LynnTheDem
"Powell prevailed over the president in September of ‘02 to go back to the United Nations and announce that he would seek another Security Council resolution.

FLIP
3/6/03 - BUSH VOWS TO HAVE A UN VOTE NO MATTER WHAT... "No matter what the whip count is, we're calling for the vote. We want to see people stand up and say what their opinion is about Saddam Hussein and the utility of the United Nations Security Council. And so, you bet. It's time for people to show their cards, to let the world know where they stand when it comes to Saddam."
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030306-8.html

FLOP
3/18/03 - BUSH WITHDRAWS REQUEST FOR VOTE "At a National Security Council meeting convened at the White House at 8:55 a.m., Bush finalized the decision to withdraw the resolution from consideration and prepared to deliver an address to the nation that had already been written."
http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2003/Mar/18/ln/ln11a.html

George W. bUsh NEVER went for a 2nd UN resolution. FACT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. "Avoiding war" vs "Opposing war"???
Is there some subtle distinction there that I don't quite get?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC