Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Justice Department Goes After Another Democratic Lawyer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 12:25 AM
Original message
Bush Justice Department Goes After Another Democratic Lawyer
Bush Justice Department Goes After Another Democratic Lawyer (And Why This is Bad News for Yoo and Bradbury)
Scott Horton - Feb 9, 2008 - http://harpers.org/archive/2008/02/hbc-90002346


It’s beginning to sound like a stuck record. Another strike by the Bush Justice Department, keeping the country safe. Who’s the target this time? A crack dealer? An al Qaeda terrorist? No. It’s a wing-tip shoed Miami lawyer, who served as president of the bar association, is held in universally high esteem (outside, of course, of the political hacks who run the Bush Justice Department) and who advised Al Gore in the 2000 Florida recount battle. According to the Justice Department, the lawyer’s involvement with Democratic politics has nothing to do with his being charged. Quite a few of his contemporaries are having problems buying that, and still bigger problems understanding his supposed “crime.”

Here’s the way the Miami Herald broke the story on Thursday:

.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kick and Rank!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R for more of the Bush* family vendetta against anyone
who crosses Babs's little boy. This is clearly a vendetta and the charges are utterly ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R Thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. until there is impeachment
they will continue to violate the law. Over and over and over...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bush Justice Department order jumbo shrimp.
Rely on military intelligence and microsoft works in their holy war, an example of tough love. A genuine imitation of friendly fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. K&R Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. K&R Thanks. Wake up people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. "I cannot help but wonder whether Ben's liberal, Democratic policies has something to do with this."
This looks like a premeditated hatchet job on Miami attorney Ben Kuehne by Bush's criminalized DOJ.



Kuehne is accused of approving tainted legal payments by an accused Columbian drug kingpin in 2002 to his newly retained defense attorney, Roy Black. Black had earlier sought the legal advice of Kuehne as to whether he (Black) should accept payment from his new client, with the concern that the money had the potential to be "dirty drug money".

Roy Black had hired Kuehne specifically because of Kuehne's reputation as a meticulous and factual researcher. According to the article last Thursday in the Miami Herald, the investigation had initially focused on Black:

Ironically, the investigation first focused on Black following Ochoa's conviction at his 2003 trial in Miami. But authorities dropped their interest in Black and shifted to Kuehne, who became the target because his buffer-like role insulated Ochoa's defense attorney from any criminal liability for accepting the fees.


When Ochoa wanted to retain Black in 2002, the defendant had no legitimate money to pay the lawyer. Black also wanted assurances that his client's money was clean.
In turn, Ochoa and his family sold off some alleged pre-drug trafficking property, including prized Paso Fino horses and livestock from their Colombian ranch and real estate holdings.

Black hired Kuehne to scrutinize the transactions and he deemed them legitimate. But FBI and IRS agents discovered the sales were to cartel associates or straws, which in the eyes of the government made the proceeds dirty, several law enforcement sources said.
Before Ochoa's trial, Kuehne had met with federal prosecutors in Miami to discuss the controversial fee issue in the hope of creating a ''zone of comfort'' -- although they never agreed to give him a stamp of approval for Ochoa's payments to Black. At one point, U.S. District Judge K. Michael Moore considered appointing a public defender to resolve the problem -- but Black eventually stepped in with Kuehne's blessing of the payments.



And here are more crucial details:


In the Ochoa case, sources familiar with the probe said both federal and Colombian investigators have traced the source of his family's sales, determined the proceeds came from dirty money and that Kuehne should have uncovered it before he moved the money through trust accounts to Black. Under one money laundering statute, a lawyer cannot approve or accept legal fees from a client if the attorney knows the payments are from criminal proceeds such as drug trafficking. Congress, however, made an exemption for lawyers when there is uncertainty about the source of the proceeds -- an exemption the Justice Department has never acknowledged.

Under another law, it is a crime to launder dirty money for the purpose of furthering a criminal activity or to conceal the source of the money. A key factor: the congressional exemption for lawyers does not apply to this statute.
Under either statute, prosecutors have to prove Kuehne was a ''knowing and willful participant'' in the alleged money laundering activity by authorizing Ochoa's legal payments to Black.


The investigation into Kuehne -- along with two Colombian suspects named in the indictment -- was handled by the Justice Department in Washington because of a conflict of interest in the U.S. attorney's office in South Florida.



Who thinks that quickly removing this case out of the the South Florida US Attorney's Office and sending it to Main Justice in Washington is to guarantee that Bush's political appointee hitmen can engineer this case directly? Looks like it.


Black stepped in to represent Ochoa in 2002. Black and the three other lawyers retained Kuehne to research Ochoa's sale of family assets to determine if the proceeds were legitimate for paying legal fees.
Kuehne, with the help of a Colombian accountant, lawyer and others, researched the Ochoa family's alleged pre-drug trafficking holdings -- including ranch lands, breeding horses and cattle. He visited with Ochoa family members in Colombia, where they auctioned some of those assets to suspected cartel associates, according to several law enforcement sources.

After reviewing the sale and proceeds, Kuehne assured Black and the other defense lawyers that their client's money was clean.



Kuehne's indictment, which had been sealed since late October, shocked many of his peers in South Florida's legal community because he is widely known as a brainy lawyer with the utmost integrity. He is past president of the Dade County Bar Association and a member of the Florida Bar Board of Governors.

''He's a leader in the legal community, he's the epitome of professionalism and he's an ethics guru,'' said attorney Ervin Gonzalez, a former Dade Bar president who has served on the Board of Governors alongside Kuehne. ``Moreover, he is so detailed, thorough and complete, that I'm sure, if he has given a legal opinion, it is well founded.

``He is the last person in the world I would think would be charged with this crime. Frankly, I don't believe he's capable of committing such a crime.''




On Thursday, a group of local lawyers planned to go to federal magistrate court in Miami in a show of support for Kuehne, who faces up to 10 years in prison if convicted. ''Ben is a mentor to half of the lawyers in Miami,'' said David O. Markus, current president of the South Florida Federal Bar Association, who publishes a blog on the legal community. ''His character is beyond reproach. If you had to pick the person least likely to have done something wrong -- even something as minor as jaywalking -- Ben would be at the very top of the list.'' Jeffrey Weiner, a Miami attorney and a past president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, said he was ''deeply disheartened'' that the Justice Department would go after such an ``honorable lawyer.''

''I cannot help but wonder whether Ben's liberal, Democratic politics has something to do with this,'' Weiner said. ``Why isn't this U.S. attorney's office standing up to the Justice Department in Washington? What has he done wrong? I think it's absolutely terrible.''



Federal prosecutors face a formidable challenge in proving the case against Kuehne. They will have to prove that Kuehne knew Ochoa's money came from the sale of family assets to drug-trafficking associates -- or that he avoided that knowledge through ``deliberate ignorance.''




First they came for Governor Siegelman. Now, they've come for Ben Kuehne.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. This deserves a thread of its own. Check this out first, FL dirty tricksters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. what took them so long? read on...
Justice Department officials allege that Kuehne broke the law in 2002-03
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Great point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
13. I sincerely do not understand the charges.
:shrug:

The defendant/client sold property to pay lawyer fees. Allegedly, the property was sold to bad people and, therefore, defense attorney is guilty of some crime?

:shrug:

How is that possible?

Hell, if such loosely proposed charges can be pursued against this guy, we have a freakin' slew of charges to pursue against this administration and every single one of its appointees in addition to all its constituents!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC