Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BUSHCO Refuses To Sign New UN Treaty-Because-They Do NOT Want To Be Prosecuted For Torture!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:32 PM
Original message
BUSHCO Refuses To Sign New UN Treaty-Because-They Do NOT Want To Be Prosecuted For Torture!
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 02:58 PM by kpete
February 12, 2008 at 10:31:24

Headlined on 2/12/08:
OpEdNews Exclusive: United States is not a signatory to United Nations Human Rights and Torture Convention!

by Michael Morris Page 1 of 6 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com


On February 6th 2008 I received a letter from and the contents of that letter (see below) astounded me. In short, it says that the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights can not prosecute the United States of America for Human Rights violations under Article 22 because after the 2002 re-ratification of the Treaty, the United States did not sign the new Treaty.

...................

In short, the United States signed a Treaty that they would not violate Human Rights and Torture people within our boundaries and can only do so if it does not conflict and is in line with the US Constitution. The United States then put in provisions to provide the loop holes by which the United States and government officials could not be prosecuted by the World Court if they violated what was contained in the Treaty and in effect our Constitution.

.................

Bottom line, it would seem that the US would not sign this Treaty because the US did not want to be held accountable for torture on the world stage or at home. This level of a decision not to sign a Treaty can only come from a cabinet level position which means that the President has to be informed. (Unless someone is willing to fall on his/her sword) It would also seem to verify that because the US was knowingly violating Human Rights and using what the people of the US would call torture, but what this administration light bending legal definitions has twisted into "extreme interrogations", this administration twisted and buried the truth once again from the American People with the heading of National Security.

The CIA tapes that were destroyed may have contained not only evidence that we violated our own laws, but international laws as well. Does anyone remember that DONALD RUMSFELD WAS CHARGED WITH TORTURE DURING A TRIP TO FRANCE!

The world knew what was happening, but the US did not care and though its actions and lack of action made every American citizen complacent in torture and abuse. Do you not remember how the world, including the US, viewed the German people when we all learned the truth of the Nazi death camps?

more at:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_michael__080211_opednews_exclusive_3a_.htm

Letter here:


http://www.opednews.com/articles/2/opedne_michael__080211_opednews_exclusive_3a_.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Smith_3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. There was once a time when the whole world admired the USA.
But those in charge now have really set their mind on completely destroying any sense of admiration that people worldwide have felt, and replacing it with fear and loathing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. oh, these SOB's they have no respect for anyone or anything.
can the UN do anything to hold these bastards accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. WE have to be the heros we are waiting for. WE have too hold these bastards accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. is this the tipping point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes this is the point where we call for and PARTICIPATE IN a GENERAL STRIKE. Shut the country down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Ya Right..Americans are going to leave their TVs for a Strike..
Americans don't care...They really and truly don't...As long as they aren't the ones being tortured or shot at they truly could care less. We have morphed into a very non-caring nation..But we do have the right to own guns so all is well with the world...:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That is the beauty of it they can stay home and watch TV and that is the strike. NO WORK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dan Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. So, in theory, in 1940's...
if Germany and Japan had refused to sign documents of this type - no actions could have been taken against their leaders?

So, prosecution for crimes against humanity are dependent on the offending country agreeing to sign a document?

Just trying to work this out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Didn't we get out of the International Criminal Court for the same reason?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. No Clinton signed the ICC. But Congress never ratified it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Clinton signed it???? is this for real??
and the Congress never ratified it, so can the ICC still take a stand or is this filthy administration immuned from prosecution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC