Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Digby hits on why this McCain thing is relevant.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 09:41 PM
Original message
Digby hits on why this McCain thing is relevant.
by digby

Back in the 2000 campaign when St John the Flyboy was every journalist's favorite pol, a story emerged about him major sending letters on behalf of a contributor, Paxson Communications, to the FCC.

When The Boston Globe disclosed the Paxson intervention a few weeks after the Claremont summit, McCain handled the disclosure with aplomb, even chutzpah. The chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee argued that he had done nothing wrong and that the suspicion falling on him only reinforced his argument for campaign finance reform.

"We're all tainted," McCain said. "We're all under suspicion as long as Washington is awash in special interest money."

The fanboys in the press loooved that answer. Senator Straight-Talk was just telling like it was, more in sorrow than in anger, showing that he too was subject to the same suspicion that other politicians were. But he, being the driver of the straight-talk express, was naturally above reproach.

Well, apparently there was more to the story. It turns out that McCain had a very cozy relationship with Paxson's lobbyist, to the extent that some of his staff were worried that he was having an affair with her. (They both deny it, and I could not care less if it's true.) But whatever it was, they were very close and McCain was apparently doing official favors for her.

The NY Times reports:

Early in Senator John McCain’s first run for the White House eight years ago, waves of anxiety swept through his small circle of advisers.

A female lobbyist had been turning up with him at fund-raisers, in his offices and aboard a client’s corporate jet. Convinced the relationship had become romantic, some of his top advisers intervened to protect the candidate from himself — instructing staff members to block the woman’s access, privately warning her away and repeatedly confronting him, several people involved in the campaign said on the condition of anonymity.

When news organizations reported that Mr. McCain had written letters to government regulators on behalf of the lobbyist’s clients, the former campaign associates said, some aides feared for a time that attention would fall on her involvement.

Mr. McCain, 71, and the lobbyist, Vicki Iseman, 40, both say they never had a romantic relationship. But to his advisers, even the appearance of a close bond with a lobbyist whose clients often had business before the Senate committee Mr. McCain led threatened the story of redemption and rectitude that defined his political identity.

It had been just a decade since an official favor for a friend with regulatory problems had nearly ended Mr. McCain’s political career by ensnaring him in the Keating Five scandal. In the years that followed, he reinvented himself as the scourge of special interests, a crusader for stricter ethics and campaign finance rules, a man of honor chastened by a brush with shame.

But the concerns about Mr. McCain’s relationship with Ms. Iseman underscored an enduring paradox of his post-Keating career. Even as he has vowed to hold himself to the highest ethical standards, his confidence in his own integrity has sometimes seemed to blind him to potentially embarrassing conflicts of interest.

Mr. McCain promised, for example, never to fly directly from Washington to Phoenix, his hometown, to avoid the impression of self-interest because he sponsored a law that opened the route nearly a decade ago. But like other lawmakers, he often flew on the corporate jets of business executives seeking his support, including the media moguls Rupert Murdoch, Michael R. Bloomberg and Lowell W. Paxson, Ms. Iseman’s client. (Last year he voted to end the practice.)


It goes on to outline just what a hypocrite McCain has been on this subject.

I don't know if McCain is crooked. But you have to wonder, after his close call with the Keating Five and public association with campaign finance reform, how anyone could be so arrogant as to think he could get away with this stuff if he actually became the Republican nominee? After all we've seen of pages and blue dresses and wide stances, it's nearly impossible to believe that candidates can think they'll get away with hiding anything like this in this environment.

But apparently, he did. He has bought so fully into his media love that he seems to have believed that he wouldn't be held to the same standards as other politicians. I guess he thought that nobody could ever believe he'd do anything dishonest. But now that another woman has been injected into this (by GOP operatives, I might add), his whole facade is in danger of crumbling. The press might have been willing to overlook the corruption angle, but the sex angle is just impossible for them to resist.

By the way, as this alleged relationship was happening (or shortly before) John McCain voted to impeach Clinton on both counts. One of those counts had to do with concealing his plan to help Monica Lewinsky land a job.
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/arrogance-express-by-digby-back-in-2000.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. a kick for my honey bunny
:kick:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Hey Cat...
Checking out the eclipse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. i thought i missed it?
wait!!!

I can see it!!!!!

I'm looking out the window.

so cool!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. another K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. McCain is Republican
Of course he's a hypocrite. He's just a little cruder than your average corrupted Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Keep in mind, though, that the NYT is the paper that told us Iraq had WMDs
They hired Judy Miller.

I don't think they're the paper of record anymore. They're just yet another rag with an agenda.

Just sayin'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Another similar hint
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yes he is crooked. He was given a walk on the Keating Five.
War hero and all that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. It just dawned on me, that we're going to vote in the next president,
based on who has the least scandal problem.

Guys, in order to understand the 21st Century, we have to deconstruct logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:20 PM
Original message
I Want Digby's Children...
Yep...implant this almost 52 year old male body with the proper euqipment...i'm ready to go. :rofl:

The sex isn't the sizzle here...the lobbyist connections are.

A more recent, relevant question for Mr. Straight Talk would be for him to explain why he voted against further media consolidation a couple years ago and then was rolled by Kevin Martin last December.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. I wonder if McCain didn't release this himself to make it look like he has a working prostate
Trying to make it look like he isn't 9 million years old and might have some 40 year old want his mangy, old, skank bod.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC