Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Expert: White House Had "Primitive" Email Setup

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:49 PM
Original message
Expert: White House Had "Primitive" Email Setup
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/expert_white_house_had_primiti.php

Expert: White House Had "Primitive" Email Setup
By Paul Kiel - February 26, 2008, 6:14PM

From the AP:

A computer expert who worked at the White House provided the first inside look at its e-mail system Tuesday, calling it a "primitive" setup that created a "high" risk that data would be lost.

Steven McDevitt's written statements placed on the public record at a congressional hearing asserted that a study by White House technical staff in October 2005 turned up an estimated 1,000 days on which e-mail was missing....

McDevitt's statements detailed shortcomings that he said have plagued the White House e-mail system for six years. He declared that:

_The White House had no complete inventory of e-mail files.

_There was no automatic system to ensure that e-mails were archived and preserved.

_Until mid-2005 the e-mail system had serious security flaws, in which "everyone" on the White House computer network had access to e-mail. McDevitt wrote that the "potential impact" of the security flaw was that there was no way to verify that retained data had not been modified.


You can see McDevitt's full answers here (pdf).

Remember that as The Washington Post outlined last month, the Bush Administration managed to dismantle the Clinton Administration's email archive system without replacing it with anything at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 07:54 PM by Solly Mack
I remember reading about the ARM System instituted by Clinton being dismantled by Bush Inc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. When the choice is between crooked and grossly incompetent
I think I'd prefer crooked.

(But then we know the bush admin is both crooked AND grossly incompetent).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Ditto n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The weaknesses weren't accidents - they were features.
If this is true it all, then I have no doubt that the system was deliberately set up to be primitive. In any case, the * White House never intended to keep public records or abide by the laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Um, these guys are *NOT* grossly incompetent
They knew exactly what they were doing.

:grr:

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. actually what has happened these last 7 plus years points to them being very competent
treasonous bastids but competent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Somehow, I find this difficult to believe.
I think that this is what they want us to believe, but I ain't buying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm skeptical myself; it's too 'neat'. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Oh, that explains
why they were using the RNC's email servers. :mad:

too neat is too kind, it's a crock of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. YOU!
Long time, no see. :hug: Hope all is well with you, my friend! :pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Things are quite nice
I got off of FEMA probation in November and life in my tree house is wonderful, glorious.

all is well me, thanks for hoping and the hugs. :hug:

I hope life is being good to you. :pals: :loveya:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. The tree house! I'm really happy for you, merh.
All is well here, too, thanks for asking. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. Doesn't that mean that it's MORE likely that emails thought to be "deleted"
are still in the system?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well you don't want any records sitting around when
you know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. Riiiiiiiight. Color me Skeptical. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. Liars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC