|
and I do not believe in them. Earmarks, as currently defined aren't even pork, they are pure lard.
They work against planned development and often serve the needs of real estate developers rather than citizens. Kansas City is number two in the nation for sprawl, and that is because our city planning became a function of Jessie Clyde Nichols real estate and Howard, Needles, Tammen, Etc engineering. after the rise of City Manager based administration in the fifties. We solved our racial tensions by fleeing out to successive rings of suburbia. The inner rings are rapidly failing economically and have crime rates worse than the inner city in some cases as their only real economic engines have moved down the highway.
Without smart growth in KC, this city is not going to survive the future price of gasoline. If they don't get a grip on fungal development, they are going to expand us into being a city that Detroit can look at and feel better.
But here we are, getting another huge earmark in the Paseo Bridge project. I am a Keynesian and I am not against public goods as economic stimulus, far from it, but you have to have a process that actually prioritizes what needs to be built, rather than just moving right into the EIS phase.
I cannot tell you how much more impressed I would have been with a Kit Bond library the size and location of the new sprint center than a state of the art automobile only bridge whose bike ped facilities are optional, in light of the pedestrian killed trying to get to his house in Harlem, MO (NKC-East) on foot, crossing an interstate highway bridge with no sidewalk or shoulder last month.
I am not against naming something for Kit Bond. But wouldn't it be nice if it was something with more utility than a replacement for an motorist-only bridge that has recently been fixed with a futuristic motorist only bridge that only encourages more bad development?
I might add that I seem to be very much in the minority in my view round here.
|