Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

some anthrax news

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 11:41 AM
Original message
some anthrax news


http://www.rawstory.com/news/mochila/Advocates_say_ruling_chills_reporte_03082008.html


Press Advocates Criticize Judge in Contempt Case Against Former Reporter


A judge is trying to bankrupt an ex-reporter with daily fines as much as $5,000 for refusing to disclose her sources for stories about the 2001 anthrax attacks, press advocates said Saturday.

They also said the case involving Toni Locy shows why Congress should pass a federal shield law for reporters.

U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton on Friday denied a request from Locy to stay payment of fines for a contempt citation pending an appeal and ruled she must "personally bear the responsibility of paying the fine the court imposed."

While at USA Today, Locy wrote about a former Army scientist, Steven J. Hatfill, whom the Justice Department identified in 2002 as a "person of interest" in the anthrax attacks. They killed five and sickened 17 others weeks after the terrorist strikes of Sept. 11, 2001.

-snip-

"What he's doing is essentially saying, 'Toni Locy I am going to destroy your life'" she said. "This is just plain crazy. I know you're not supposed to call a federal judge arrogant, but this is arrogant."

The judge pointed to statements Hatfill's lawyers made in court papers in explaining his rationale. Hatfill's legal team said that while Locy's reporting was conducted "within the scope of her employment for USA Today, her contempt was not. It began long after she left the employment of USA Today."

Starting at midnight Tuesday, Locy was ordered to pay fines of $500 a day for the first week, $1,000 a day for the second week and $5,000 thereafter until she appears before the judge April 3.
-snip-
-------------------------------------


see how they get rid of truth tellers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let me get this straight
They've set the date of her appearance and they're fining her every week until the appearance? Arrogance ain't the word for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hmm....so she ruins Steven Hatfills life and now the judge may ruin hers.
Why am I supposed to be upset about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. the "shadowy group" which pays for her services outside the scope of USA Today
Edited on Mon Mar-10-08 11:53 AM by librechik
to slander Hatfill (while the real anthraxer gets away scot free) will take care of her. She'll be fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. "see how they get rid of truth tellers."
I don't get the "truth teller" part. She's repeating a lie given to her by a government official.

She should be coming clean on who her sources were because it's the right thing to do. This case involves multiple deaths and a government agency is giving out false and misleading stories. She should be worried about exposing the cover up and not worried about protecting her source.

Maybe if we knew who was peddling the lies it would help solve the question as to who's responsible for this atrocity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It is certainly interesting. Watching this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Are you saying you believe Toni Locy told the truth when she identified Hatfill?
Hatfill was the patsy. Locy was the mouthpiece for the propaganda. Squeeze her until she squeals.

I admire Judge Walton's actions here and in the Libby case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Nevermind... thought this was an Anthrax Coulter thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wiley50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Walton: same judge as Scooter Libby and Sibel Edmonds
convicted Libby

silenced Sibel's case against govt imposed gag order

He gets around

has some blacked out sections of his financial disclosures or so I've read
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. interesting info on judge, thanks
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC