Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Republicans gag witnesses against credit card companies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 09:44 PM
Original message
House Republicans gag witnesses against credit card companies
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 09:52 PM by housewolf
Found this at DailyKos

House Republicans gag witnesses against credit card companies
by smintheus
Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:36:27 PM PDT

Like so many other Americans, they discovered that their credit card interest rates had skyrocketed without warning and sometimes inexplicably. So on Thursday these citizens were invited to testify before the House Financial Services subcommittee on Consumer Credit, which is considering the The Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights (PDF). This legislation would add some significant new consumer protections, such as requiring credit card companies to notify customers at least 45 days in advance of a rate increase.

But Republicans on the committee found a repulsive new way to prevent the witnesses from testifying. At the last minute, the GOP insisted that these victims of arbitrary fee hikes (who'd flown into DC from around the country to tell their stories) had to sign a vaguely worded waver permitting the credit card companies to discuss their credit histories publicly anywhere, anytime.

For four of the five, it was a deal-breaker. Instead of signing the waivers allowing them to testify Thursday, they all sat silently in the audience.

"I didn't want all my ... information out there for just anybody," said Denver's Susan Wones, who saw the interest rate of her JP Morgan Chase card jump from 0 percent to 23 percent in one month last summer, without notification or explanation. "I'm extremely upset I can't talk about this."...

At Thursday's hearing, the first panel was to consist of five card holders who had suffered interest rate hikes or unexplained user fees despite a claimed history of responsible borrowing. The GOP waiver requirement came as a surprise, the witnesses said, not least because it surfaced just one day before theb] hearing. "I didn't have time to contact a lawyer or anything," Wones said.

In addition, witnesses said they were concerned with the vagueness of the one-sentence waiver language, which offered no limitations on where or when the lenders could discuss their credit histories.

Make no mistake, this Republican stunt had the sole purpose of gagging witnesses who would otherwise have testified about the credit card companies' sharp practices.

more...
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/16/193627/586/553/477447

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's lucky they just gagged him. There COULD have been diapers involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. rethugs
I wish everyone should stop acting surprised when they do something despicable. They know that the game for them is almost over and want to delay it for as long as possible. For the first time average income republicans are getting screwed by their hero's, and when it comes time to vote, there will be change. Don't forget that indictments that come after shrub is gone can't be pardoned by him. He may escape to Paraguay, but his party will be destroyed and may never recover. I hope it's not too late, and I don't think it is. However this election may be out last chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Good points
But man, this was purely despicable! Vicious meanness.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. How was this allowed to happen? Were they the majority on the committee?
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 10:31 PM by lonestarnot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Good question!
It was the House Financial Services subcommittee on Consumer Credit. Apparantly privacy waivers are normal for witnesses to this committee, but generally the waivers are limited in scope so as to allow the committee & staff acceess to data.

How the Repubs managed to implement this very broad waiver, I don't know.

Here's some more info:
http://www.coloradoconfidential.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=3571


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. April 9th next meeting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Wouldn't even a subcommittee have a Dem chair?
We need the names of the Dems on that committee. Why did they allow the Repigs to pull this bullshit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Same reason they voted for the BK bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC