CNN: Clinton no win, but maybe yes if, but no so why try?

Rex

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-24-08 04:09 PM
Original message

CNN: Clinton no win, but maybe yes if, but no so why try?

Wow, what a report. She should fold it in with only 47% to his 49%? Series? CNN?

Series? She needs a little more than 50%, but can't win so should pack it in?

Series?

Ugh, why don't they just leave our Dem runners alone? Both will beat the pants off of any Repuke.

Oh yeah...paymasters, PNAC, Repukes, M$M.

Nasty words, nasty media whores.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Pawel K

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-24-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message

1. A little more than 50%?

Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 04:13 PM by Pawel K

She needs a lot more than 50% to win.

And you are right, it would have been no problem for Obama or Hillary to win against the GOP. But since Hillary now seems to be campaigning for McCain knowing she has lost this primary our victory doesn't seem to be as clear as it used to be. And with 37% of HRC supporters saying they will support McCain over Obama I personally smell a rat, the same smell Joe Lieberman gave off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Rex

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-24-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #1

2. 56% of all the rest of the states.

She is 2% below Obama in popular vote and the M$M tells her to pack it in. Silliness, like her supporting McCain. We will see her fold behind Obama, anyone who believes otherwise is being silly.

We've all seen the picture of Bill and Poppy, so what they were both POTUS of the US. Stop being surprised. The real details fall into what Hillary will do differently as POTUS then what Obama will do in terms of the BFEE. That is where the real rat is, I won't compare Clinton to Joe quite yet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Pawel K

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-24-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #2

5. 56% is a lot more than 50%. But I'm curious where you are getting 56% from

Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 04:20 PM by Pawel K

that number is more in the 60% range.

The real question is what Clinton will do about BFEE? Shit, she supported most of his positions until they became unpopular. In fact she still hasn't admitted voting for the Iraq war was a mistake. So I really don't understand why you think she will do more than Obama. My point is there is a lot of legitimate reasons that she needs to drop out, it has nothing to do with media conspiracies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Rex

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-24-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #5

7. CNN

I, unfortunately, turned it on. That is what they said. 56% is not a lot more when you take a error of 3 percent in reporting. Just kinda made me laugh at CNN. I think she will do less than Obama, my post was about her packing it in while it is still close.

That is all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

msongs

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-24-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #1

3. you actually talked to 37% all hillary surporters? that's millions of people nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Pawel K

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-24-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #3

6. Clearly, scientific polls are bullshit when they don't happen to fit your agenda?

Science is science. And currently it is telling us that 37% of Clinton supporters would rather have McCain than Obama. You figure that one out, I already know what it means.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DJ13

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-24-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #1

4. She needs a lot more than 50% to win

she needs to win EVERY.....SINGLE.......STATE.....by MORE.....THAN.......66% to hope to catch Obama in pledged delegates.

Hillary should be shown the door by the party super delegates before Pennsylvania even votes so we can begin the GE campaign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

TheWraith

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-24-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #4

9. I think they meant 50% of the total. nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

TheWraith

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-24-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message

8. Okay... will there be coherent sentences next time?

I recognize all the words you just used, but order sense not make.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Rex

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-24-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #8

10. Maybe, not.

Understand will you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Mon May 06th 2024, 07:03 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.