Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fox Refuses To Pay FCC Indecency Fine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 08:19 AM
Original message
Fox Refuses To Pay FCC Indecency Fine
Fox Refuses To Pay FCC Indecency Fine

By Frank Ahrens
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, March 25, 2008; Page D01


In an unusually aggressive step, Fox Broadcasting yesterday refused to pay a $91,000 indecency fine levied by the Federal Communications Commission for an episode of a long-canceled reality television show, even as the network fights two other indecency fines in the Supreme Court.

The FCC proposed fining all 169 Fox-owned and affiliate stations a total of $1.2 million in 2004 for airing a 2003 episode of "Married by America," which featured digitally obscured nudity and whipped-cream-covered strippers.

Fox appealed immediately after the FCC ruling. Last month -- four years later -- the FCC changed its mind, saying it would fine only the 13 Fox stations located in cities that generated viewer complaints about the program. That reduced the fine to $91,000.

Despite the sharp reduction, Fox said it would not pay the fine on principle, calling it "arbitrary and capricious, inconsistent with precedent, and patently unconstitutional" in a statement released yesterday.

Typically, after the FCC determines that a broadcaster is culpable for an indecency fine, the broadcaster pays it -- by writing a check to the U.S. Treasury -- or may attempt to negotiate a settlement, sometimes dragging the process out for years. Sometimes, a broadcaster will take a case to court. Other times, the broadcaster will pay the fine and appeal, hoping for a reversal and refund.

more...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/24/AR2008032402969.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, they are part of the BFEE
after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anexio Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not a very big fan of Fox's products...
...but I have to agree with the Fox lawyers in that the fines are "arbitrary and capricious, inconsistent with precedent". I don't know about unconstitutional though.

I remember when Stern was fined something like a trillion dollars for saying a couple of swear words during his show.

If you dont like what you're watching or listening to then change the damn station or better yet, turn it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. what about their "wardrobe malfunction" when a cameraman focused on a fan wearing
a "F*ck (the other team)" and the guys in the truck sent it out, and Faux allowed it to air? Hmmm??? crickets ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Then revoke their fucking corporate charter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC