|
Edited on Wed Apr-02-08 11:20 PM by Withywindle
OK, it's a few months premature. But worth celebrating for a long time. :) And I got sick of burying this point as a response on other threads.
I'm making this personal to illustrate how absurd and irrelevant the whole argument that "marriage" has a "religious" basis as a justification for denying the right (or selling it short) to gay and lesbian couples is to me. Marriage is religious? Say that to my dad. To his face. I dare you.
My parents had been dating for 3 months when they eloped for their INS shotgun wedding in 1968 (Mom was a foreign college exchange student). They were 19 and 24. They were married more or less alone in a courthouse. No minister gave a benediction. No priest signed the form. They've never believed in any supernatural being having anything to do with their fights, their sex life, their insurance claims, their retirement plans, the raising of their child (I was never christened, baptized, first communioned, bat mizvahed, etcetera), their movie rentals, their storage space issues, their hikes in the woods, their divergent musical tastes, or anything else that fills the years of a life together.
What makes a marriage? They wanted to make a commitment, and they did. They filled out the paperwork, they took some oaths in front of a judge, and from there on, the world accepted the two of them as a pair. They stayed together, so ownership of the house, custody of me, hospital visits and bank accounts, all of that, have never been an issue for them. Saying "my wife" and "my husband" eventually grew natural in their conversation. Guys still hit on my mom, and she just says "No thanks, I'm married." Natural and obvious. Taken for granted.
It helps, of course, that they're heterosexual, a man and a woman. If you ask me, that's a matter of luck. Random genetics or whatever it is that both of them happened to be wired straight. Lucky for them, because they had it easier than a lot of other pairs of people who have loved and do love each other just as much, but didn't have the relative ease of just signing a paper, saying a mutual "yup" in front of a judge, and from then on having the right to have the person you love and trust most in the world recognized as your legal next of kin.
Nobody should begrudge my parents this, cause it wasn't always easy for them, as it isn't always easy for most couples who try to make the lifelong commitment stick. But I can see NO good reason to make it MORE difficult for some couples than others just based on gender, out of arbitrary prejudice and superstition. Don't blame it on God and don't claim that "religion" is the source of pair-bonded mating. Religion didn't invent that, it just commemorated something that was already natural and widespread. People didn't start dying just because at some point our proto-human ancestors decided to start having rituals for the dead. And "religion" in no way dictates how real people really love.
|