Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

please review my 134th letter before I send it off(grammar,facts)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:02 AM
Original message
please review my 134th letter before I send it off(grammar,facts)
As recent developments about increased suicides and PTSD among our Iraq War veterans have escalated, I thought it important to review how our Presidential Candidates “Support the Troops”.Recently,Senator Jim Webb introduced a bill for GI Educational Benefits called “The New G.I. bill“. Senators Clinton and Obama both voted “for” this bill. Senator McCain voted “against“. His rationale? “Officials in charge of Pentagon personnel worry that a more generous and expansive GI Bill would create an incentive for troops to get out of the military and go to college” Heavens forbid.

At this point, John McCain has fully embraced the "less jobs and more war" philosophy. He has been famous for touting this on several talk shows, noting how the American jobs shipped overseas aren’t coming back, but there will always be war. Essentially, he's offering troops the opportunity to sacrifice more for fewer incentives. With the Bush administration's help, McCain is telling America's troops, "Thanks for your service and your three combat tours in five years. Now get back to work."

This is the Republican stance on “Supporting the Troops”-support them as long as “Our” kids don’t have to serve. Support them until it requires more funding or effort. Support them until it involves their children or families. A “Bait and switch”-Support the Troops” on the sign outside-nothing inside the store that remotely resembles this. Remember who has been in charge of military funding for the last 12 years…do you trust them to truly” support our troops”?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's well written, and I agree with you.
If I were to quibble, I might say "heaven forbid" instead of "heavens" and I might not capitalize the words in the quoted phrases. Also, there is an extra quote mark after "Bait and switch".

These are small points. Your letter is already better written than most!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thank you..I think it detracts from the message..
when I make stupid grammatical errors...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good letter. I saw no mistakes
The best way to support the troops is to not send to a "stupid" war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. G8t letter!
I have one suggestion that you can completely ignore. How about working in the superficiality of 'flag pin patriotism'? Something like 'McCain's support for the troops is like Republicans wearing flag pins to demonstrate their patriotism, it is all for show.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yewberry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nice letter. You are amazing in your tenacity.
A couple of little things: I wouldn't quote for or against. Punctuation goes inside quote marks (sentences 1,2,3,5, and the last one).

Also, you might consider including a reference to 'mental illness' of even in sentence one. I recently heard a story that claimed that among returning soldiers with mental illness (primarily PTSD and depression), just half were receiving help, and less than half of those were getting help considered 'adequate.' (I wish I remembered the source!)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. reference my 133rd letter printed friday-and thanks for the advice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC