Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

From the CIA fact book! Burma.. HAS OIL!!!!!!!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:30 AM
Original message
From the CIA fact book! Burma.. HAS OIL!!!!!!!!!!

Burma, a resource-rich country, suffers from pervasive government controls, inefficient economic policies, and rural poverty. The junta took steps in the early 1990s to liberalize the economy after decades of failure under the "Burmese Way to Socialism," but those efforts stalled, and some of the liberalization measures were rescinded. Despite Burma's increasing oil and gas revenue, socio-economic conditions have deteriorated due to the regime's mismanagement of the economy. Lacking monetary or fiscal stability, the economy suffers from serious macroeconomic imbalances - including rising inflation, fiscal deficits, multiple official exchange rates that overvalue the Burmese kyat, a distorted interest rate regime, unreliable statistics, and an inability to reconcile national accounts to determine a realistic GDP figure. Most overseas development assistance ceased after the junta began to suppress the democracy movement in 1988 and subsequently refused to honor the results of the 1990 legislative elections. In response to the government of Burma's attack in May 2003 on AUNG SAN SUU KYI and her convoy, the US imposed new economic sanctions in August 2003 including a ban on imports of Burmese products and a ban on provision of financial services by US persons. Further, a poor investment climate hampers attracting outside investment slowing the inflow of foreign exchange. The most productive sectors will continue to be in extractive industries, especially oil and gas, mining, and timber with the latter especially causing environmental degradation. Other areas, such as manufacturing and services, are struggling with inadequate infrastructure, unpredictable import/export policies, deteriorating health and education systems, and endemic corruption. A major banking crisis in 2003 shuttered the country's 20 private banks and disrupted the economy. As of 2007, the largest private banks operated under tight restrictions limiting the private sector's access to formal credit. Moreover, the September 2007 crackdown on prodemocracy demonstrators, including thousands of monks, further strained the economy as the tourism industry, which directly employs about 500,000 people, suffered dramatic declines in foreign visitor levels. In November 2007, the European Union announced new sanctions banning investment and trade in Burmese gems, timber and precious stones, while the United States expanded its sanctions list to include more Burmese government and military officials and their family members, as well as prominent regime business cronies, their family members, and associated companies. Official statistics are inaccurate. Published statistics on foreign trade are greatly understated because of the size of the black market and unofficial border trade - often estimated to be as large as the official economy. Though the Burmese government has good economic relations with its neighbors, better investment and business climates and an improved political situation are needed to promote serious foreign investment, exports, and tourism.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bm.html

Burma is a country rich in natural resources. NO wonder all the vultures in the world are circling. The people of Burma are fucked. The vampires are coming. They will take everything of value them turn them into slaves. Look at that beach front property! OOH! I bet the hotels already have blueprints layed out. Too bad the people of Burma didn't read THE SHOCK DOCTRINE! If they had they would eat grass before they let USAID or the NGO's in! To the vultures.. We will be watching what you do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's always worth reminding
all of us. Thanks for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Just remember one word
Chevron. Bushco isn't fooling people who read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Back in 2004 weren't a lot of *'s campaign items made there,
even though the U.S. wasn't supposed to do business with them? I seem to remember that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, they do have oil. And gems and teak and many resources.The current regime is however truly EVIL
They are pumping the oil, mining the gems, harvesting the teak and putting the money from those resources directly into their own pockets and the pockets of the military. They live in palaces while the citizens are starving and forced into slavery on development projects.

I have spent a good deal of time in Burma. It is a very rich country that is being destroyed for the personal enrichment of the ruling junta. If ever there was a country that needed liberation, this one would be it.

The Junta is seizing the aid because they have no intention of feeding all of the suffering. The people that were hit by the cyclone are not "bamar". Many are minorities and they have no intention of saving them.

This is one of the most corrupt governments in the world and if the United Nations decided to take action against them, I would support them wholeheartedly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. They would end up just like the Iraqis.
I would like to see them get help, just not from the vultures. The aid should be put directly into the people's hands with NO middlemen. I know that's hard to do now but we have to invent a new way of giving aid. The vampires have totally corrupted this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. What action could the UN take?
Pass a resolution condemning the government in Burma. It has no large military or security force to take any action. In spite of the fact that the US owes the UN money, we still provide a large portion of the financing. It's a deliberative body with little authority or resources to act.

Remember, the UN couldn't even save Tokyo from Godzilla.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snarkoleptic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. Interesting stuff. Thanks for the drill-down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. lumber to feed the chinese factories that make cheap furniture
for the world markets. there`s but a few furniture manufactures left in the usa.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. John Perkins: "The Secret History of the American Empire"


...

National disasters, like wars and aid projects, are highly profitable for big businesses. A great deal of money for rebuilding is earmarked for U.S. engineering firms and large corporations owning hotel, communications and transportation networks, banks, insurance companies, etc. Sometimes they also provide an opportunity for local governments to extend their oppression - eg. just prior to the 12/26/04 tsunami the Indonesian government was ready to reach an agreement with Aceh rebels largely favorable to them - however, after the disaster disorganized and weakened the Aceh, it instead sent in additional forces to break their resistance in the resource-rich (multinational target)Aceh sector.

....

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0452289572/ref=pd_cp_b_0?pf_rd_p=317711001&pf_rd_s=center-41&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=052595015X&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=1ZJMYW7CEHXVTAHE3VSX
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. John Perkins is awesome!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sixty_cycle_humm Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. China is already there
China's CNPC-PetroChina will get first dibs on any oil exploration in Burma. If memory serves they already are building a pipeline into China as I type.

I don't think China at this stage in her growth will sit by and let the US plunder resources they can use that are so near to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Not when they can plunder themselves. They are doing in Burma what they do everwhere
they go. They don't care about local populations. The Chinese are not our friends. They are not anyone's friends. They are very homophobic, caring only for what is in their interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. Now, who they talking about again????
****Despite Burma's increasing oil and gas revenue, socio-economic conditions have deteriorated due to the regime's mismanagement of the economy. Lacking monetary or fiscal stability, the economy suffers from serious macroeconomic imbalances - including rising inflation, fiscal deficits, multiple official exchange rates that overvalue the Burmese kyat, a distorted interest rate regime, unreliable statistics, and an inability to reconcile national accounts to determine a realistic GDP figure.****

and the difference between them and usa would be????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. 1.9 billion barrels isn't exactly very much. Come on now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC