Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conservative activist compares gay marriage to polygamist sect

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:29 PM
Original message
Conservative activist compares gay marriage to polygamist sect
Have these people no shame? Polygamist sect - abusing young girls and forcing them into marriage and sex at ages as young as 11-13. Ellen & Portia - two women who love each other and wish to make a lifetime commitment to each other. How the fuck does someone compare one to the other?

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/CNN_guest_compares_gay_marriage_to_0520.html

Conservative activist compares gay marriage to polygamist sectDavid Edwards and Muriel Kane
Published: Tuesday May 20, 2008

The news that comedian Ellen DeGeneres will be marrying her longtime girlfriend, thanks to a California court's ruling in support of gay marriage, has been widely welcomed in both gay and entertainment circles.

However, Wendy Wright, president of the conservative Christian women's group Concerned Women for America, finds the prospect dismaying, fearing that acceptance of gay marriage could provide justification for abuses like those found among the Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints cult in Texas.

"No one wants to deny Ellen happiness," Wright told CNN primly, "but overturning a moral foundation of society is too high of a price to pay. Redefining marriage does have consequences for others. ... In New Jersey, a church was sued and lost because it did not want to allow a same-sex ceremony on its property."

<<<snip>>>>

"There's some who say people should be able to do whatever they want in their own personal relationships," Wright went on. "But we do need to look at the consequences of that. And we can look right now at the polygamy community in Texas. ... When you redefine marriage to mean anything, it can mean nothing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. "No one wants to deny Ellen happiness,"
except that they just want to deny Ellen happiness. :eyes:

Why don't they go away?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. time once again for really bad analogies!
gay people wanting to be married to their so=sect people wanting multiple wives, sorry Wendy, you fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. That's so funny. Yea, the bad analogies.....my favorite
is the gays will want to marry box turtles, courtesy of Republic Texas Senator John Cornyn

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. i'm so beyond tired of these assholes it defies description.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DAGDA56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why is it that for every Hillary Clinton to lead women forward,
there seems to be a Wendy Wright type to hold them back!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Straight women maybe. She's not in favor of equal marriage.
Her comment on the California marriage decision was some bullshit equivocating civil unions cop-out. To be fair, so was Obama's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Concerned Women for America is a dipshit organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papapi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hippocrites!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. hypocrites?
whaa?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. She's so full of BS she must be about to burst
:puke:

In New Jersey, a church was sued and lost because it did not want to allow a same-sex ceremony on its property.

No, simp, it's a public accommodation. Not only that, they haven't even lost yet! And furthermore, the "same-sex ceremony" in question was a civil union, not a marriage! :dunce:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_Grove%2C_New_Jersey#Civil_union_controversy

A same-sex couple filed a civil rights complaint with the New Jersey Division of Civil Rights against the Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association in early 2007, claiming the Association discriminated against them by denying their request to hold a civil union ceremony in the Boardwalk Pavilion, which the Association owns and uses for Sunday services, concerts, and weddings. The complaint is the first in New Jersey since same-sex civil unions were recognized there in 2007, said a Division of Civil Rights spokesman.

Scott Hoffman, the Chief Administrative Officer of the Camp Meeting Association, was quoted as saying that the association considers the Pavilion to be as much of a religious structure as the Tabernacle or the Youth Temple and that it would not permit same-sex civil union ceremonies to be conducted there, arguing that this was the position of the United Methodist Church.

A local advocacy group, Ocean Grove United, disputes this, contending that the issue involves public, not religious, property. They contend that the beach and Boardwalk Pavilion are open to the public and that the Camp Meeting Association has accepted public funds for their maintenance and repairs. They also cite the Association's application to the State of New Jersey for monies under the state's "Green Acres Program", which encourages the use of private property for public recreation and provides a $500,000 annual property tax exemption. In their application for these funds, the Camp Meeting Association reportedly stated that the disputed areas were open to the public. U.S. Representative Frank Pallone, Jr. (Democrat), in whose Congressional district Ocean Grove is located, stated "they've taken state, federal and local funds by representing that they are open to the public."


Aside: One of our very finest DUers, soleft, and her partner are preparing to move to this very town, where, she informs us, rainbow flags fly everywhere! :bounce:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. All the hateful bigot ass hole RW nut-jobs try to compare it to something completely ludicrous
Makes me want fucking smash their face in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. If these assholes want an analogy, they should look no further than Vito Fossella
I strongly doubt Ellen will impregnate her secret lover while railing about "protecting the family"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. Typical bullshit...cheap and desperate crap..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC