Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Glorious Victory

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 10:38 AM
Original message
Glorious Victory


Diego Rivera absolutely pegged the War Party with this painting, Glorious Victory. The canvas-mounted mural tells the story of the CIA's overthrow of the democratically elected government of Guatemala in 1954. It's a painting that probably won't be in demand for display in any national gallery in Washington, D.C., although it should be. Here's the story, courtesy of Mark Vallens and Art for Change.



Diego Rivera: Glorious Victory!

Mark Vallens
Art for Change
Friday, October 05, 2007

EXCERPT…

Painted in 1954, the mockingly titled Glorious Victory has as its subject the infamous CIA coup of the same year that overthrew Guatemala’s democratically elected government. At the center of the mural, CIA Director John Foster Dulles can be seen shaking hands with the leader of the coup d'état, Colonel Castillo Armas. Sitting at their feet is an anthropomorphized bomb bearing the smiling face of U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower - who gave orders to launch the military coup. In the background, a priest can be seen officiating over the massacre of workers, many of which can be seen lying slaughtered in the painting’s foreground.



The head of the Central Intelligence Agency at the time of the coup, Allen Dulles, and the U.S. Ambassador to Guatemala during the coup, John Peurify, are depicted handing out money to various Guatemalan military commanders and fascist junta officials, as Mexican Indian workers slave away at loading bananas onto a United Fruit Company ship. I might add that Allen Dulles was on the board of directors of the United Fruit Company when the U.S. overthrew the government of Guatemala.

CONTINUED…

http://www.art-for-a-change.com/blog/2007/10/diego-rivera-glorious-victory.html



Here's more on the misunderremembered history:



Guatemala 1953-1954
While the world watched


excerpted from the book
Killing Hope
by William Blum

Third World Traveler

To whom does a poor banana republic turn when a CIA army is advancing upon its territory and CIA planes are overhead bombing the country?

The leaders of Guatemala tried everyone-the United Nations, the Organization of American States, other countries individually, the world press, even the United States itself, in the desperate hope that it was all a big misunderstanding, that in the end, reason would prevail.

Nothing helped. Dwight Eisenhower, John Foster Dulles and Allen Dulles had decided that the legally-elected government of Jacobo Arbenz was “communist”, therefore must go and go it did, in June 1954.

In the midst of the American preparation to overthrow the government, the Guatemalan Foreign Minister, Guillermo Toriello, lamented that the United States was categorizing “as ‘communism’ every manifestation of nationalism or economic independence any desire for social progress, any intellectual curiosity, and any interest in progressive liberal reforms.”

SNIP…

The centerpiece of Arbenz’s program was land reform. The need for it was clearly expressed in the all-too-familiar underdeveloped-country statistics: In a nation overwhelmingly rural, 2.2 percent of the landowners owned 70 percent of the arable land; the annual per capita income of agricultural workers was $87. Before the revolution of 1944, which overthrew the Ubico dictatorship, “farm laborers had been roped together by the Army for delivery to the low-land farms where they were kept in debt slavery by the landowners.”

SNIP…

The first plan to topple Arbenz was a CIA operation approved by President Truman in 1952, but at the eleventh hour, Secretary of State Dean Acheson persuaded Truman to abort it. However, soon after Eisenhower became president in January 1953, the plan was resurrected. Both administrations were pressured by executives of United Fruit Company -- much of the vast and uncultivated land in Guatemala had been expropriated by the Arbenz government as part of the land reform program. The company wanted nearly $16 million for the and, the government was offering $525,000, United Fruit’s own declared valuation for tax purposes.

United Fruit functioned in Guatemala as a state within a state. It owned the country’s telephone and telegraph facilities, administered its only important Atlantic harbor, and monopolized its banana exports. A subsidiary of the company owned nearly every mile of railroad track in the country. The fruit company’s influence amongst Washington’s power elite was equally impressive. On a business and/or personal level, it had close ties to the Dulles brothers, various State Department officials, congressmen, the American Ambassador to the United Nations, and others. Anne Whitman, the wife of the company’s public relations director, was President Eisenhower’s personal secretary. Under-secretary of State (and formerly Director of the CIA) Walter Bedell Smith was seeking an executive position with United Fruit at the same time he was helping to plan the coup. He was later named to the company’s board of directors.

CONTINUED…

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Blum/Guatemala_KH.html



Who’s to say they wouldn’t do this at home?



Guatemalan Agent of C.I.A. Tied to Killing of American

By TIM WEINER
New York Times
March 23, 1995

A Guatemalan military officer who ordered the killings of an American citizen and a guerrilla leader married to an American lawyer was a paid agent of the Central Intelligence Agency, a member of the House Intelligence Committee said today.

The intelligence agency found out about the killings ordered by the Guatemalan colonel on its payroll, but concealed its knowledge for years, the committee member, Representative Robert G. Torricelli, said in a letter he sent today to President Clinton.

Moreover, the State Department and the National Security Council learned the facts months ago but did not tell the guerrilla's widow, Jennifer Harbury, who has been petitioning the White House to disclose her husband's fate, the letter said.

A member of the Senate intelligence committee, which has been briefed on the two killings, confirmed the gist of the statement by Mr. Torricelli, a New Jersey Democrat.

"The direct involvement of the Central Intelligence Agency in the murder of these individuals leads me to the extraordinary conclusion that the agency is simply out of control and that it contains what can only be called a criminal element," the letter to the President said.

CONTINUED…

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE4D7173EF930A15750C0A963958260



It's a good bet Bush and his bosses have been thinking about remodeling America into the Guatemalan model. If you think not: Why would the GOP be doing all they could to destroy unions? Why would they be stacking the courts with Federalist Society statists and right-wing property rights advocates? Why else would they be privatizing intelligence from gathering to wet work? Why would Halliburton be building internment camps across the U.S.A.? They're certainly not public make-work programs.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dark history that continues to repeat itself
and you are spot on about Bushco wanting the US to become a 3rd world nation. In such places, the people in power are GODS- beyond the law and basically untouchable.

Think Congress wouldn't enjoy being part of that group?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. On September 11, 2001, Congress got left off the chopper...
When the "Continuity Of Government" plan kicked in, no Democrats got evacuated to Mt. Thunder (or whatever it's called).



‘Shadow Government’ News To Congress

WASHINGTON, March 2, 2002
CBS News

Key congressional leaders say they didn’t know President Bush had established a “shadow government,” moving dozens of senior civilian managers to secret underground locations outside Washington to ensure that the federal government could survive a devastating terrorist attack on the nation's capital, The Washington Post says in its Saturday editions.

Senate Majority Leader Thomas A. Daschle (D-S.D.) told the Post he had not been informed by the White House about the role, location or even the existence of the shadow government that the administration began to deploy the morning of the Sept. 11 hijackings.

An aide to House Minority Leader Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo.) said he was also unaware of the administration's move.

Among Congress's GOP leadership, aides to House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (Ill.), second in line to succeed the president if he became incapacitated, and to Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott (Miss.) said they were not sure whether they knew.

Aides to Sen. Robert C. Byrd (D-W. Va.) said he had not been told. As Senate president pro tempore, he is in line to become president after the House speaker.

Mr. Bush acknowledged yesterday that the administration had taken extensive measures to guarantee "the continuity of government," adding, “This is serious business.”

CONTINUED...

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/03/01/attack/main502530.shtml



Thanks for understanding, Hydra. "Next time" this happens, as Sneer observed, the DEMs would like to be invited to safety. As for the rest of us, it's: "Good luck!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Very nice article
I though the dems got invited to Mnt. Weather, but this sounds like the only people who would be invited are Cheney and his cronies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yeh. There's only so much room in the lifeboat...
...and in these situations, we know what happens to those in steerage.



Here's a bit on the subject:

Know your BFEE: The Secret Government
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks
Edited on Fri May-23-08 12:39 PM by maryf
only wish your zoom had included the bleeding child, Diego included all the effects didn't he?... now for some Goya atrocities of war...Thanks again, great info and truth...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Banana Republicans: The United Fruit Company
Excellent point, maryf. Wish I could find a good version of the original piece. The bomb close-up was the only detail I could find.

Here's a bit on the Brothers Dulles outfit, "Conspiracies In Action":



BANANA REPUBLIC:
THE UNITED FRUIT COMPANY


P. Landmeier © 1997

EXCERPT...

In 1944, the people of Guatemala overthrew the right-wing dictator then in power, Jorge Ubico. Guatemala held its first true elections in history. They elected Dr. Juan Jose Arevalo Bermej to the presidency. A new constitution was drawn up, based on the U.S. Constitution. Arevalo was a socialist and an educator who built over 6,000 schools in Guatemala and made great progress in education and health care.

At this time in Guatemala, just 2.2 percent of the population owned over 70 percent of the country’s land. Only 10 percent of the land was available for 90 percent of the population, most of whom were Indians. Most of the land held by the large landowners was unused. Arevalo was succeeded in another free election by Jacobo Arbenz who continued the reform process begun under Arevalo. Arbenz proposed to redistribute some of the unused land and make it available for the 90 percent to farm. Here is where the problem arose: United Fruit was one of the big holders of unused land in Guatemala. The pressure mounted against UFCO and finally the company complained to the many friends it had within the U.S. government including President Eisenhower and Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, saying that Guatemala had turned communist.

The U.S. State Department and United Fruit embarked on a major public relations campaign to convince the American people and the rest of the U.S. government that Guatemala was a Soviet “satellite”.

“It (United Fruit) began with enviable connections to the Eisenhower administration. Secretary of State John Foster Dulles and his former New York law firm, Sullivan and Cromwell, had long represented the company. Allen Dulles, head of the CIA, had served on UFCO’s board of trustees. Ed Whitman, the company’s top public relations officer, was the husband of Ann Whitman, President Eisenhower’s private secretary. (Ed Whitman produced a film, “Why the Kremlin Hates Bananas,” that pictured UFCO fighting in the front trenches of the cold war.) The fruit firm’s success in linking the taking of its lands to the evil of international communism was later described by one UFCO official as “the Disney version of the episode.” But the company’s efforts paid off. It picked up the expenses of journalists who traveled to Guatemala to learn United Fruit’s side of the crisis, and some of the most respected North American publications - including the New York Times, New York Herald Tribune, and New Leader - ran stories that pleased the company. A UFCO public relations official later observed that his firm helped condition North American readers to accept the State Department’s version of the Arbenz regime as Communist-controlled and the U.S.-planned invasion as wholly Guatemalan.” (Quoted from Inevitable Revolutions - The United States in Central America by Walter La Feber, 2nd ed. 1993, pp. 120-121.

The campaign succeeded and in 1954 the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency orchestrated a coup, code-named “Operation PBSUCCESS”. The invading force numbered only 150 men under the command of Castillo Armas but the CIA convinced the Guatemalan public and President Arbenz that a major invasion was underway. The CIA set up a clandestine radio station to carry propaganda, jammed all Guatemalan stations, and hired skilled American pilots to bomb strategic points in Guatemala City. The U.S. replaced the freely elected government of Guatemala with another right-wing dictatorship that would again bend to UFCO’s will.

The history of Guatemala since the Spanish conquest is one of continuous domination and repression. For a brief ten years from 1944 to 1954, Guatemala experienced the fresh air of democracy. However, with a right-wing dictatorship back in power, Guatemala was thrown back into the dark ages and the stage was set for the next 30 years of repression and killing. As part of their efforts in the coup, the CIA made a list of 70,000 “questionable individuals”. During Guatemala’s 36 year civil war that just came to an end this year (1996), the government often referred to this list originally put together by the CIA.

CONTINUED...

http://www.mayaparadise.com/ufc1e.htm



Thanks for caring. And a most hearty welcome to DU, maryf!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Thanks to you!
I find it ironic that this discussion on the "Banana Republic" comes out on the same day as one on the demise of bananas, perhaps the fruit is just plain depressed...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x361160

As an art teacher I search for ways to motivate my students to consider what is going on in the world, Mark Vallens site is a marvelous new tool for me, thanks for that, and for all these other links. The more deeply I can become acquainted with the actions which have brought us to where we are, the better I can help inform others and impel them to action, hopefully. Thanks again for your info, great to share!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Monk Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. this is one rocky missed k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Ha ha! Rivera's masterpiece at Rockefeller Center got the wrecking ball.
I guess the really rich, inherited-wealth guy must've disagreed with Rivera's politics.



Man at the Crossroads, destroyed on the orders of Nelson Rockefeller.

http://www.fbuch.com/crossroa.htm

Thanks for giving a damn. And if I haven't written so already: A most hearty welcome to DU, T Monk!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yes!
Another piece to discuss with the kids about how the dominant rule even the art world...(Maybe Diego should have disguised Lenin a little better! that must have really slapped Rocky in the face!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Monk Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. thank-you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LucyParsons Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Awesome. Thanks for posting this.
Edited on Fri May-23-08 12:53 PM by LucyParsons
K&R

That Eisenhower bombface would make an awesome tattoo...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. You're welcome, LucyParsons! LOL! It WOULD make a good tatoo!
They love Glorious Leader in Guatemala:



http://www.boingboing.net/2007/03/15/guatemala-photos-fro.html

With apologies to Don Rivera, his thing'd make a great poster with monkey's mug on it, too.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Another view for a poster...


So many pieces falling into place.

Thank you, Octafish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. That's exactly it, Pastiche423. Smirko's only the front-stooge for the War Mob.


It's like a priesthood, but with nukes.





The Real Eisenhower: Planning to Win Nuclear War

by Ira Chernus
CommonDreams.org
Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Peace activists love to quote Dwight Eisenhower. The iconic Republican war hero spoke so eloquently about the dangers of war and the need for disarmament. He makes a terrific poster-boy for peace. But after years of research and writing three books on Ike, I think it’s time to see the real Eisenhower stand up. The president who planned to fight and win a nuclear war, saying “he would rather be atomized than communized,” reminds us how dangerous the cold war era really was, how much our leaders will put us all at risk in the name of “national security,” and how easily they can mask their intentions behind benign images.From first to last, Eisenhower was a confirmed cold warrior. Years before he became president, while he was publicly promoting cooperation with the Soviet Union, he wrote in his diary: “Russia is definitely out to communize the world….Now we face a battle to extinction.” On the home front, he warned that liberal Democrats were leading the U.S. “toward total socialism.”

Everyone knows that, in his Farewell Address, he warned about the military-industrial complex (MIC). But few recall the words that immediately followed: “We recognize the imperative need for this development . … Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action,” because the danger of the communist foe, “a community of dreadful fear and hate<,> … promises to be of indefinite duration.”

This was not merely rhetoric for public consumption. Eisenhower never saw any hope of rapprochement with the Soviets. He always saw them as irredeemably treacherous, “implacably hostile and seeking our destruction,” as he wrote to Winston Churchill. “Where in the hell can you let the Communists chip away any more? We just can’t stand it,” he complained to a meeting of Congressional leaders in 1954, as he considered intervening in Vietnam. (He held back only because Britain and France refused to support him.)

Ike wanted to avoid nuclear war, but not at all costs. He told his National Security Council (NSC): “If the Soviets attempt to overrun Europe, we should have no recourse but to go to war.” The U.S. must be “willing to ‘push its whole stack of chips into the pot’ when such becomes necessary,” he told Congressional leaders, adding, “We are going to live with this type of crisis for years.” If World War III erupted during his term in office, he boasted, “he might be the last person alive, but there wouldn’t be any surrender.”

In private conversations with foreign leaders he said: “To accept the Communist doctrine and try to live with it” would be “too big a price to be alive. He said he would not want to live, nor would he want his children or grandchildren to live, in a world where we were slaves of a Moscow Power.” “The President said that speaking for himself he would rather be atomized than communized.”

Eisenhower signed NSC 5810/1, which made it official U.S. policy to treat nuclear weapons “as conventional weapons; and to use them whenever required to achieve national objectives.” “The only sensible thing for us to do was to put all our resources into our hydrogen bombs,” he told the NSC. He found it “frustrating not to have plans to use nuclear weapons generally accepted.” He and his Secretary of State, John Foster Dulles, were “in complete agreement that somehow or other the taboos which surround the use of atomic weapons would have to be destroyed.”

CONTINUED...

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/03/18/7742/





Thank you for the image.



Yes. It's becoming perfectly clear, my Friend!



That is precisely what the face of death looks like.



We must fight to prevent the world these warmongers plan for our children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. 1954 isn't so long ago.
I wouldn't doubt that many in the current malAdministration studied at the feet of the architects of this coup. Sure sounds like the neocons. Then again, this may be the single instance where they studied and emulated history, but that would stretch and strain all credulity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. E Howard Hunt helped out in Guatemala.
So did David Atlee Phillips, who cut his teeth on PB/SUCCESS. William Blum sheds light on the, eh, fellahs...



Guatemala 1953-1954
While the world watched


excerpted from the book
Killing Hope
by William Blum

Third World Traveler

EXCERPT...

The primary purpose of the bombing and the many forms of disinformation was to make it appear that military defenses were crumbling, that resistance was futile, thus provoking confusion and division in the Guatemalan armed forces and causing some elements to turn against Arbenz. The psychological warfare conducted over the radio was directed by . Howard Hunt, later of Watergate fame, and David Atlee Phillips, a newcomer to the CIA. When Phillips was first approached about the assignment, he asked his superior, Tracy Barnes, in all innocence, “But Arbenz became President in a free election. What right do we have to help someone topple his government and throw him out of office?”

‘For a moment,” wrote Phillips later, “I detected in his face a flicker of concern, a doubt, the reactions of a sensitive man.” But Barnes quickly recovered and repeated the party line about the Soviets establishing “an easily expandable beachhead” in Central America.

Phillips never looked back. When he retired from the CIA in the mid-1970s, he found the Association of Retired Intelligence Officers, an organization formed to counteract the flood of unfavorable publicity sweeping over the Agency at the time.

American journalists reporting on the events in Guatemala continued to exhibit neither an investigative inclination nor a healthy conspiracy mentality. But what was obscure to the press was patently obvious to large numbers of Latin Americans. Heated protests against the United States broke out during this week in June in at least eleven countries and was echoed by the governments of Ecuador, Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile which condemned American “intervention and “aggression”.

CONTINUED...

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Blum/Guatemala_KH.html



Thanks for giving a damn, DCKit! Really appreicate you understanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. art
for change


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Ya know who’s got a lot of oil, doncha? Sand, too.
Rivera really did capture the faces of everybody, from Dulles to the murdered children.

Speaking of Capitalism’s Invisible Army, Jacques Vallee talked about a CIA Cuba Project that involved projecting an image of the Virgin Mary or other UP on to the side of a cloud. The thing was supposed to scare the daylights out of the Cuban people and get them think the End of Days had arrived.





Vallee Dimensions Cuba UFO Cloud Projector

In “Dimensions,” Vallee wrote:


It may seem preposterous for government to spend time and money testing the public’s reaction to the idea of contact with extraterrestrials. Yet, I strongly suspect at least two major UFO cases were covert experiments in rumor generation and in the deliberate of contactee cults (one of these cases took place in Spain, one in France). To the skeptical reader, I can only point out that there are people on the government payroll who’s job it is to devise contingency plans for all sorts of extreme situations. Under the Nixon administration, a White House task force had even proposed a scheme for the invasion of Cuba that involved a submarine equipped with lasers. It would “paint” an image of Christ over the island to simulate the Second Coming. This “miracle,” it was thought, would disturb the Catholic population in Havana, paralyze communications, and disorganize the Cuban armed forces long enough for commandos to seize strategic points and overthrow the Castro regime.

In his well-documented book, “War on the Mind,” clinical psychologist Peter Watson, who was a member of The Sunday Times Insight team which investigated (among other things) the use of psychological warfare by the British, reveals that the equipment has been developed to use low-lying clouds as a screen off which to bounce huge propaganda shows. Tape recordings of primitive gods had been prepared to be played from helicopters, thus frightening tribes.

During the Vietnam War, a U.S. military unit called the 4th Psyop Group, invented an image projector called the “Miralux.” It used 85mm slides and 1,000-watt bulb to project pictures on buildings, mountains, and cloudbanks.

I believe that it is imperative for scientists to study UFOs. But we should not do it naively. With the process of human technology, it is becoming possible to study any UFO report without considering the possibility of a deliberate deception, along with the other classical hypotheses. Many UFO groups are gullible to any rumor that seems to support the extraterrestrial credo, without seriously investigating where the rumor comes from and who may have been interested in spreading it. The skeptical zeal of some of the more vocal debunkers is also inspired by the need to maintain political control. To prevent genuine scientific study from being organized, all that is needed is to maintain a certain threshold of ridicule around the phenomenon. This can be done easily enough by a few influential science writers under the guise of humanism and rationalism. UFO research is equated by them with false science, thus creating an atmosphere of guilt by association which is deadly to any independent scientist. Efforts are made to systematically discredit professional researchers who investigate the phenomenon.

Source: “Dimensions: A Casebook for Alien Contact," pp. 248-249, 1988, Contemporary Books, Chicago.



Shoot. Everybody knows that’s bushet. That won’t happen until Chimpageddon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #15
26. Art and the CIA
Some pointy-headed patriots just love chaos.



Art and the CIA

by Richard Cummings

In the play ART, someone buys an abstract painting at an enormous price, while his friends ponder how they are going to tell him that it is inherently worthless. In the debate about abstraction and whether it was entirely some sort of hoax, the new traditionalists ridicule its "flatness" and its absence of narrative, while defenders of abstraction insist that representative art is a form of nostalgia that modernism sought to eliminate. The defenders are definitely losing ground, but one wonders why they were ever regarded as credible.

The point that most art critics miss is that art is also a form of commerce, and not antithetical to it. The god of art is the art market. And so one might ask, "How did a Jackson Pollock get to be worth so much money?" Part of it had to do with the Cold War, which not only bloated the military budget, but distorted the art market as well.

Faux genius and con man Clement Greenberg was at the center of the scam. A former itinerant necktie salesman, Greenberg teamed up with struggling abstract artist and mountebank, Barnett Newman, to promote a vision of art that conveniently coincided with the objectives of the US Cold War Establishment. Indeed, Greenberg argued that the avant-garde required the support of America’s elite classes, a self-serving concept that would promote his personal interests as a collector.

As the competing ideologies of capitalism and communism clashed after the Second World War, the question of "What is art?" became a significant issue in the struggle for dominance. Was art a vehicle of state propaganda to glorify a proletarian revolution or depict an evil Hitler in his bunker at the end of the heroic struggle against fascism (never mind about the Hitler-Stalin pact), or was it the product of individual creativity unrestrained by governmental control and censorship?

But since America was then in the throes of one of its tedious puritanical backlashes, the sensuality of great Western art, as represented by say, Goya’s "Naked Maja," was out of the question. Deriving their central thesis from Islamic art that representation of the sensual human form was interdicted by the sublime, the new Abstract Expressionists fit neatly into what the American intelligence community desperately needed to rebut Soviet representational propaganda; an art that was highly individualistic but which did not offend the sensibilities of conservative religion. A Baptist preacher or Bishop Sheen could laugh at a Pollock, but he could not condemn it as obscene. Yet because "modern art" was widely derided, it needed a boost from an invisible sponsor, which would turn out to be the CIA.

In this milieu Clement Greenberg came forth in support of the new art. Yes, the canvas was flat, and it should be covered flatly by paint in abstraction, so beauty would be destroyed in the name of the sublime. And Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) director Richard Barr heralded this view when he quoted Greenberg’s co-conspirator, Newman, who infamously proclaimed, "The impulse of modern art was to destroy beauty." Barr went even further – God was dead and had been replaced by Abstract Expressionism.

CONTINUED...

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig3/cummings3.html



Sorry to be so wordy. It's an art. It's a business. It's for control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. Kick
fantastic thread, its a keeper!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Mark Lombardi
A great artist who combined maps and stories in order to document treason, war profiteering, global organized crime and a whole lot more:


Mark Lombardi and the Ecstasy of Conspiracy

Michael Bierut

With the 40th anniversary of the assassination of JFK freshly behind us, our abiding romance with conspiracy theories seems more ardent than ever. And one of the most remarkable expressions of that romance is on view at The Drawing Center in New York, "Global Networks," an exhibition of the work of Mark Lombardi. In an age where we all dimly sense that The Truth Is Out There, Lombardi's extraordinary drawings aim to provide all the answers.



Although Lombardi's work has combined the mesmerizing detail of the engineering diagram and the obsessive annotation of the outsider artist, the man was neither scientist nor madman. Armed with a BA in art history, he began as a researcher and archivist in the Houston fine arts community with a passing interest in corporate scandal, financial malfeasance, and the hidden web of connections that seemed to connect, for instance, the Mafia, the Vatican bank, and the 1980's savings and loan debacle. His initial explorations were narrative, but in 1993 he made the discovery that some kinds of information are best expressed diagrammatically.

The resulting body of work must be seen to be believed — an admittedly oxymoronic endorsement of subject matter of such supreme skepticism. Lombardi's delicate tracings, mostly in black pencil with the occasional red accent, cover enormous sheets of paper (many over four feet high and eight feet long), mapping the deliriously Byzantine relationships of, say, Oliver North, Lake Resources of Panama, and the Iran-Contra operation, or Global International Airways and the Indian Springs State Bank of Kansas City. Because the work visualizes connections rather than causality, Lombardi was able to take the same liberties as Harry Beck's 1933 map for the London Underground, freely arranging the players to create gorgeous patterns: swirling spheres, hopscotching arcs, wheels within wheels.



Detail, Mark Lombardi, George W. Bush, Harken Energy, and Jackson Stephens, ca. 1979-90 (5th version), 1999

Lombardi was indeed an enthusiastic student of information design, a reader of Edward Tufte and a collector of the charts of Nigel Holmes. But if the goal of information design is to make things clear, Lombardi's drawings, in fact, do the opposite. The hypnotic miasma of names, institutions, corporations and locations that envelop each drawing demonstrates nothing if not the inherent -- the intentional -- unknowability of each of these networks. Like Rube Goldberg devices, their only meaning is their ecstatic complexity; like Hitchcockian McGuffins, understanding them is less important than simply knowing they exist.

Lomardi, who was born in 1951 and died in 2000, did not live to see today's historical moment, where his worldview seems not eccentric but positively prescient. His drawing BCCI-ICIC & FAB, 1972-91 (4th version) was studied in situ at the Whitney Museum by F.B.I. agents in the days after 9/11; reportedly, consultants to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security previewed the current show at the Drawing Center. One wonders whether he would have felt vindicated or alarmed by this kind of attention.

The catalog for the exhibition, which was organized by Robert Hobbs and Independent Curators International, cannot possibly do the drawings justice. But it may be worth it for the extended captions alone, each one of which could serve as an outline for a pretty decent John leCarre novel. And in what other art catalog could you find an index where (under the Cs alone) one finds Canadian Armament and Research Development Establishment; capitalism; Capone, Al; Castro, Fidel, and conceptual art? And it is in the catalog that one finds, tossed away almost casually in a footnote, the following fact: "The police report cited suicide by hanging as the reason for Mark Lombardi's death. The door to his studio was locked from the inside." That last detail is an all-too-common device in mystery novels, where it inevitably raises the same question: yes, that's how it seems, but what really happened? Mark Lombardi's work tries, valiantly, to answer that very question.

11.24.03

http://www.designobserver.com/archives/000072.html



Lombardi created some absolutely amazing stuff -- works of greatest beauty and deepest truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. I often wonder if there was a final Lombardi that disappeared after his demise.
Or caused his demise before it disappeared.

Thanks Der Fishie, for the continuing education.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Key point, hootinholler! What was Lombardi working on?
Edited on Sat May-24-08 11:20 PM by Octafish
The Bushes provide a lot of inspiration -- as well as their contacts. The list of possibilities, as we have so amply seen documented over th epast 7 years is nearly as limitless as the Bushiz capacity for evil.

Mark Lombardi was great at making the connections between all the people, events and times understandable. And the finished works were beautiful to see. They preserve stories and the facts that make up a criminal prosecution.

Mark Lombardi @ Pierogi

What could he have been working on? When he died, it was summer 2000. Not much happening besides the U.S. Census. Just on the horizon, however, was Selection 2000. Then came Enron Energy Task Force secrecy, the corporate rip-offs, and the attendant glossing over of Bush's Arbusto-Harken-Aloha Energy Mal-fee-uhnce. One year later: bin Laden determined to strike in the United States. And his work did chronicle the connections between the House of bin Laden and the House of Bush.

Remember James R Bath?

Given that the guy's work chronicled connections between the Bushes and Big Oil, Texas oil, Middle Eastern Big Oil and crooked banking, Mark Lombardi would have been a very busy guy. And going by what he had created, it'd be a hit -- whatever it was. With all that's happened since, imagine what he would have created. Like he did with Poppy before him, Lombardi would have given us a picture of Bush and his treason .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Hmmm.
Working from syndicated news items and other published accounts, I begin each drawing by compiling large amounts of information about a specific bank, financial group or set of individuals. After a careful review of the literature I then condense the essential points into an assortment of notations and other brief statements of fact, out of which an image begins to emerge.

My purpose throughout is to interpret the material by juxtaposing and assembling the notations into a unified, coherent whole. In some cases I use a set of stacked, parallel lines to establish a time frame. Hierarchical relationships, the flow of money and other key details are then indicated by a system of radiating arrows, broken lines and so forth. Some of the drawings consist of two different layers of information—one denoted in black, the other, red. Black represents the essential elements of the story while the major lawsuits, criminal indictments or other legal actions taken against the parties are shown in red. Every statement of fact and connection depicted in the work is true and based on information culled entirely from the public record.


Funny one of the close-up shots includes Mr. Bath. Your list is certainly the fodder from which he drew. (pun intended)

-Hoot

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Jim Bath establishes a direct connection between the Bushes and bin Ladens.
And an artist told the story. Then, he died.

Here's another type of artist, a writer, who, in the summer of 2001, also told the story of the connection between the House of Bush and the House of bin Laden:



Why would Osama bin Laden want to kill Dubya, his former business partner?

By James Hatfield

Editor's note: In light of last week's horrific events and the Bush administration's reaction to them, we are reprising the following from the last column Jim Hatfield wrote for Online Journal prior to his tragic death on July 18:

July 3, 2001—There may be fireworks in Genoa, Italy, this month, too.

A plot by Saudi master terrorist, Osama bin Laden, to assassinate Dubya during the July 20 economic summit of world leaders, was uncovered after dozens of suspected Islamic militants linked to bin Laden's international terror network were arrested in Frankfurt, Germany, and Milan, Italy, in April.

German intelligence services have stated that bin Laden is covertly financing neo-Nazi skinhead groups throughout Europe to launch another terrorist attack at a high-profile American target—his first since the bombing of the USS Cole in Yemen last October.

According to counter-terrorism experts quoted in Germany's largest newspaper, the attack on Dubya might be a James Bond-like aerial strike in the form of remote-controlled airplanes packed with plastic explosives.

Why would Osama bi Laden want to kill, Dubya, his former business partner?

I knew that bombshell would whip your heads around. So here's the straight scoop, folks.

CONTINUED...

http://www.onlinejournal.org/Special_Reports/Hatfield-R-091901/hatfield-r-091901.html



That story was filed on July 3, 2001. It spelled out how Bush had been warned that Osama bin Laden was planning to hijack an airplane and use it as a missile -- apparently at the G-8 summit in Genoa. That helps explain why monkey was afraid to sleep at the hotel in Genoa and slept aboard a state-of-the-air-defense-art U.S. destroyer offshore.



Bush knew.

Here he is, just told a second plane has been hijacked and flown into the World Trade Center, a half hour after he’s been informed that a plane was hijacked and flown into the World Trade Center. He doesn’t even wink when Andy Card tells him, “America is under attack,” let alone scramble the Air Force.



At BEST, this shows criminal dereliction of duty. Most LIKELY, it shows treason.

Plot to assassinate Bush – reports

Ashcroft Flying High

Why would Osama bin Laden want to kill Dubya, his former business partner?

Genoa braces for G8 summit


Here’s more on the warnings the administration received BEFORE SEPTEMBER 11, 2001:

Rice More Sordid Than Foley

On her recommendation, Tenet briefed Ashcroft and Rumsfeld (not Powell, though).

Rumsfeld, Ashcroft said to have received warning of attack

An exasperated Tenet then ordered an underling to brief Monkey in Crawford in August.

While Bush vacationed, 9/11 warnings went unheard.

Here’s what seals the deal for me:

Bin Laden determined to strike in US

Then, he turned around and said to the CIA briefer:

"All right. You've covered your ass now."



The crazy monkey IS a traitor.



Jim Hatfield also died. Like Mr. Lombardi, a "suicide," a few weeks before September 11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. The thing I'm continually amazed at is that when I talk of these things...
People have no freakin clue! It really harshes my mellow.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #23
39. Wow, so glad I bookmarked this thread!
I missed the Lombardi stuff yesterday. He was phenomenal, as a lateral thinker and map lover, my admiration for him is quite strong. Whoda thunk this thread would have touched on 9/11 truth stuff? Wish he'd lived through that, many answers may have come through his art, thanks again! Peace, Mary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
21. Thank you!!
K&R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Zbigniew Libera
Edited on Sat May-24-08 12:00 AM by Octafish
You're welcome, Solly Mack!

Here's the work of a real genius, Zbigniew Libera:



Everybody in Europe knows the guy, I hear.



The guy got imprisoned by the commies for drawing cartoons about them.



That was in the late 1980s. Maybe someone should ask Halliburton to explain why the Bushiz gave them contracts to build all those camps in the USA.



Appears to me that the same mindset is coming to America today.



That is, unless more people wake the heck up.

Thanks for being awake and giving a damn, Solly Mack. Hope all is well for you and yours, my Friend!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. Fantastic!!
Toys are us...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
22. Another brilliant thread, K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Fernando Botero
Eternally horrible are those photographs from Abu Ghraib. Painting provides another kind of truth that is also unforgettable.



The art of Abu Ghraib

Louis Freedberg
Monday, January 22, 2007
SF Chronicle

AT LEAST two questions hang over the exhibit of Fernando Botero's paintings and drawings on the shameful abuses at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq that will open at the main library at UC Berkeley a week from today.

The first is what drove Botero, who typically draws whimsical, oversized pneumatic figures that have enormous popular appeal, to undertake these paintings in the first place.

The second is why they'll be displayed in a Berkeley library, rather than in the Museum of Modern Art, the Guggenheim in New York, or SFMOMA.

SNIP...



"Once in a while something comes along that strikes you in a dramatic way," Botero told me when we talked by telephone from Mexico last week. He pointed out that he has taken on more explicitly political subjects in the past, such as his series on the ravages of the drug trade in Colombia.

He said he wasn't intending to "shock people or to accuse anyone" with his Abu Ghraib depictions. He didn't do them for commercial reasons (they're not for sale). "You do it because it is in your gut, you are upset, you are furious, you have to get it out of your system."

Nonetheless, he hopes that as Abu Ghraib fades from memory -- the prison is slated for demolition -- the paintings will be a reminder of what happened there. "People would forget about Guernica were it not for Picasso's masterpiece," he said. "Art is a permanent accusation. "



The trickier question is why no U.S. museum chose to exhibit them. The only other place they have been shown in the United States was last November at New York's private Marlborough Gallery, which has been showing and selling Botero's work for decades.

Some museums may have had security concerns. Look at what happened to the Copabianco Gallery in San Francisco, which was forced to close in 2004 after it showed a painting depicting torture of an Iraqi detainee, and the gallery was vandalized and its owner assaulted.

SNIP...

Botero's paintings got the cold shoulder here despite favorable reviews in a range of respected publications. In an article titled "The Iconography of Torture" in this month's edition of Art in America, for example, the reviewer said the Abu Ghraib paintings "bear comparison with much of the political art of the modern era ... Like Guernica, Botero's Abu Ghraib paintings are a cry of pain at the pointless suffering inflicted on the victims of wars." The Washington Post's culture critic called it a "remarkable show, and a disturbing one."

CONTINUED...

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/01/22/EDGC7N728U1.DTL

Thank you for the kind words, bluesmail. I really appreciate you understanding what it's all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Thanks again!!
That such a major living artist as Botero is relegated to the Marlborough (pretty ballsy for a gallery of its caliber) and Berkeley Library (where it will be singing to the choir)is indicative of how fearful and censored is every faction of American culture. This is quite literally tear wrenching art, the tryptich especially to me for some reason, the best I've seen of Botero. "They" say most artists reach their peak at mid life; at 76 Botero is courageously creating works that reach the apex of the purpose of art IMO, to use beauty to illustrate life in all its ugliness, and to inject people with new perspectives of reality and hopefully be inspired to use it as a springboard for action. Viva don Botero!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Given that Yoo is spending time on faculty at Berkley...
It seems fitting that these would be displayed there.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Of course
which doesn't mean it isn't still preaching to the choir, all the artwork in this thread should be seen by the masses, IMO!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluereality Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
32. Nice work of art
Great colors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Oh yeah. You might like this one, based on the destroyed work...


And a most hearty welcome to DU, bluereality!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
37. Waiting for that first cinder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Paraguay? Why Not!
¿ Paraguay? ¡Porque no!



Remember Black Adder and the Witchsmeller!



Identified the Great Grumbledook
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Look at his hair!
That proves it!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
42. Botero: Nice Round Figures


Nice Round Figures

If you lived in New York City's Greenwich Village in the early 1960s, you might have encountered a tall, dapper Colombian among the hordes of aspiring artists who congregated there. Charming, garrulous and quick to make friends, he might have invited you to his tiny apartment and offered you one of his paintings for a few hundred dollars. He might even have confided that he desperately needed the money to pay the rent. If you stumped up the cash and took the painting home, you're one lucky investor. Works by Fernando Botero from that period are worth about $500,000 these days. "I sold my paintings myself to friends," Botero says. "They would come over after dinner. I was broke."

(snip)

Botero's corpulent characters — comical but keenly observed renderings of rotund ballerinas, families and Latin American small-town types like the ladies in The Gardening Club (1997) — are instantly recognizable. Even acknowledged reproductions of his work sell for hundreds of dollars on eBay. Two years ago, the British magazine ArtReview compiled a Top 10 ranking of the most highly valued artists in terms of the total value of sales. Botero came out at No. 5, behind artists like Jasper Johns and Robert Rauschenberg but ahead of Dutch painter Karel Appel and Britain's David Hockney. The editors estimated that Botero's paintings and sculptures had sold over the years for more than $57 million. Although a big chunk of those profits went to collectors, millions have been made by the artist himself. Now 73, Botero says he's lost track of how much he's created: "I've painted every day of my life since I was 17," he says, sitting in his Paris studio one recent morning, the sun flooding the room through the skylight.

(snip)

He trained in Europe in the 1950s, and never became part of the abstract or conceptual art movements, instead sticking to the voluminous figurative style he formed in his 20s. Botero says he first became fascinated with "bolometric" shapes while living in Florence in 1953, inspired by Old Masters like Giotto and Botticelli: "I saw that volume gives a sensuality to painting. People say, 'When are you going to do something different?' I say, maybe never. The day I change my convictions is the day I'll do something different. You have to be strong to just follow your convictions and do what you want to do."

(snip)

Botero's plump, comical characters appear even when the subject matter is grim. Central to the exhibition in Rome are some of the darkest images Botero has ever created: 45 paintings and drawings depicting the Abu Ghraib prison abuses in Iraq. The canvases — including Abu Ghraib 43, which shows a bruised, hooded detainee tied to the bars of his cell — will be shown publicly for the first time in Rome, and depict agonized, bloodied prisoners being tortured and bound by U.S. military guards. Botero says he was driven by shock at the prisoners' accounts, which haunted him for months. Yet some question even that. "It seems a willed attempt by a comedian to do tragedy," says Robert Storr, former senior curator of paintings at moma and now a professor at New York University.

(snip)

Increasingly distressed about Colombia's drug wars, Botero has created more than 50 works on the violence, including a painting of druglord Pablo Escobar's 1993 death in a hail of bullets on a Medellín rooftop. Botero regards these works as some of his most meaningful, and has donated them to the National Museum in Bogotá. Those paintings also draw criticism, however. "Most people said it was glorifying violence," he says.

(snip)

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1071199,00.html

---------------------------------------------

http://www.spiegel.de/img/0,1020,462348,00.jpg






















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Seeing the scale makes them more impactive still...
Thank you for these further pix, realizing the size makes them so much more impressive, I assumed they were smaller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
43. I love you, Octafish.
When I was at Berkeley, must have been in the late 80s, they put on a huge art display by Guatemalan kids in Dwinelle Hall.

They were all crayon drawings on rough paper -- of helicopters and guns and bodies and blood and no image a child should have to see, let alone, draw.

For the children.

:hug:
:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Robbie Conal
If they had them, Robbie Conal would capture the souls of the BFEE in his work.

Pruneface



Know your BFEE: They Looted Your Nation’s S&Ls for Power and Profit

Know your BFEE: America’s Ruling Gangster Class

Condescenda



Sink the BFEE: Foley gives us Congress. Condi sends 'em to prison.


KillerColin



Know your BFEE: Cheney & Halliburton Sold Iran Nuke Technology


The Crook Nixon



Know your BFEE: Nixon Threatened to Nuke Vietnam

Conal's pretty good at capturing good spirits, as well:



Know your BFEE: Money Trumps Peace. Always.


Please forgive me for the lateness of this: Thank you for all you have done for me, sfexpat2000. I appreciate you caring about what we do, working to make ours a better world, and praying for what may yet come to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC