Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Asia Times: Bush 'plans Iran air strike by August' - Senators Feinstein & Lugar briefed on plans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 10:46 AM
Original message
Asia Times: Bush 'plans Iran air strike by August' - Senators Feinstein & Lugar briefed on plans


http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JE28Ak01.html

Bush 'plans Iran air strike by August'


NEW YORK - The George W Bush administration plans to launch an air strike against Iran within the next two months, an informed source tells Asia Times Online, echoing other reports that have surfaced in the media in the United States recently.

Two key US senators briefed on the attack planned to go public with their opposition to the move, according to the source, but their projected New York Times op-ed piece has yet to appear.

The source, a retired US career diplomat and former assistant secretary of state still active in the foreign affairs community, speaking anonymously, said last week that that the US plans an air strike against the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). The air strike would target the headquarters of the IRGC's elite Quds force. With an estimated strength of up to 90,000 fighters, the Quds' stated mission is to spread Iran's revolution of 1979 throughout the region.

...

Details provided by the administration raised alarm bells on Capitol Hill, the source said. After receiving secret briefings on the planned air strike, Senator Diane Feinstein, Democrat of California, and Senator Richard Lugar, Republican of Indiana, said they would write a New York Times op-ed piece "within days", the source said last week, to express their opposition. Feinstein is a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee and Lugar is the ranking Republican on the Foreign Relations Committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. While I wouldn't put anything past Bushie, the Asia Times has not been
very reliable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. hummmmmmmmm?
A US air strike on Iran would have seismic impact on the presidential race at home, but it's difficult to determine where the pieces would fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Anybody here know Lawrence Wilkerson personally?
Someone should contact him to verify the varacity of this. He is obviously the official referenced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm not exhaling until the Oath of Office in January, 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. What, will Bush retake the oath again in January?
How will he be able to swear to uphold the Constitution after having torn it up by declaring marital law and appointing himself Emperor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. He won't take an oath of any sort. He'll just stay.
And in that case, my face should be a lovely shade of royal blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. On no...ANYTHING but MARITAL (sic) law!!!!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Duh.
Typo.

At least I didn't invoke Marshal Law or his brother Marshall Law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Isn't that what just passed in California? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. The Hush money must have gotten there in time.
One Week and not a peep, or maybe they are slow writers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I don't trust Feinstein for a millisecond, no need to say what I think of republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. Richard Luger remains a remarkably decent Republican on foreign affairs
Edited on Tue May-27-08 11:04 AM by HamdenRice
He helped defeat Reagan on South Africa issues in the 1980s. Reagan vetoed sanctions on apartheid SA, and Lugar led the Republican opposition to side with the Democrats to override the veto and impose sanctions.

Looks like he is still a decent guy despite the fact that he has watched his party turn into an open sewer over the last 2 decades -- or I should say more of an open sewer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indypaul Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Lugar - The piano player in the whore house.
Day late and several trillion dollars short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
9. Bush is trying to start a world war as his parting gift to us, and nobody is paying attention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. included history lesson for any freepers looking over our shoulder: why Iran doesn't like us
The US and Iran have a long and troubled history, even without the proposed air strike. US and British intelligence were behind attempts to unseat prime minister Mohammed Mossadeq, who nationalized Britain's Anglo-Iranian Petroleum Company, and returned Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi to power in 1953. President Jimmy Carter's pressure on the Shah to improve his dismal human-rights record and loosen political control helped the 1979 Islamic revolution unseat the Shah.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JE28Ak01.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. The Islamic Revolution was largely due to blowback...

for our authoritarian overthrow of a democratic government. Now we can see how the constant threat of terrorism is being used by the military-industrial-oil complex to further their aggressive goals, even bringing much of it home to destroy our Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
13. If this is true, and the mis-admin see it as a threat to their plans,
this report and these Senators might cause the plan to be accelerated rather than give Iran that much more time to prepare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
15. I don't buy it. Why brief Feinstein and Luger?
Seems like it would be Liebercain in its the Senate Intelligence Committee, but then, Liebercain hasn't shown much intelligence lately. Besides, they would be sworn to secrecy if it did happen, and divulging the information would be treason. Its just not very believable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. not sure of the veracity, but as I read it, those are the two intent on exposing the plan
that doesn't mean they were the only ones notified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. difi and buger luger doesn't give me much hope of them doing anything
This'll be a big assed mistake if they do as china and russia have warned against such action.

Hopefully a general, an admiral or someone will stand up to them, our CON'critters sure the fuck aren't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. From Phil Giraldi two weeks ago
in The American Conservative, so take it for what it's worth. But it does match with the Asia Times report:

Posted on May 9th, 2008 by Philip Giraldi

There is considerable speculation and buzz in Washington today suggesting that the National Security Council has agreed in principle to proceed with plans to attack an Iranian al-Qods-run camp that is believed to be training Iraqi militants. The camp that will be targeted is one of several located near Tehran. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates was the only senior official urging delay in taking any offensive action. The decision to go ahead with plans to attack Iran is the direct result of concerns being expressed over the deteriorating situation in Lebanon, where Iranian ally Hezbollah appears to have gained the upper hand against government forces and might be able to dominate the fractious political situation. The White House contacted the Iranian government directly yesterday through a channel provided by the leadership of the Kurdish region in Iraq, which has traditionally had close ties to Tehran. The US demanded that Iran admit that it has been interfering in Iraq and also commit itself to taking steps to end the support of various militant groups. There was also a warning about interfering in Lebanon. The Iranian government reportedly responded quickly, restating its position that it would not discuss the matter until the US ceases its own meddling employing Iranian dissident groups. The perceived Iranian intransigence coupled with the Lebanese situation convinced the White House that some sort of unambiguous signal has to be sent to the Iranian leadership, presumably in the form of cruise missiles. It is to be presumed that the attack will be as "pinpoint" and limited as possible, intended to target only al-Qods and avoid civilian casualties. The decision to proceed with plans for an attack is not final. The President will still have to give the order to launch after all preparations are made.

http://www.amconmag.com/blog/2008/05/09/war-with-iran-might-be-closer-than-you-think/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC