Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think maybe we blame the MSM too much.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 08:54 PM
Original message
I think maybe we blame the MSM too much.
I can read. I can think. I can form an opinion. I don't have to swallow everything that I'm told. I have the internet and I can do research. I have some responsibility for what happens to my country and I need to take responsibility for what it has become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good.
I watch all networks including Fox. I don't swallow everything I'm told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not everyone is you unfortunately.
Edited on Wed May-28-08 09:00 PM by trumad


not you of course...;-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's you. but out there in Dumbfuckistan, they only know what they're told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, and you and I have the interest to do such. Most Americans aren't that interested in politics
to make it the hobby that you and I do and so they aren't aware of how the m$m is manipulating us. Scotty, for whatever reason, is making it apparent to them even if they never read the book.

The m$m is finally showing some shame and it's about G*ddamned time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Batgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fact: propaganda works.
Upwards of 75% of the public supported the invasion of Iraq because they believed the propaganda that was being foisted upon them by Bushco via our corporate media lapdogs.

Are all those people numbskulls because they believed what they were told? For trusting that what they were being told was actually true?

The only reason those approval ratings went down was because finally reality became too obvious. The propaganda couldn't disguise the fact that we lost the war, just as it couldn't disguise Bushco malfeasance before/during/after Katrina.

Most entities who have something to sell, whether it's laundry soap or an invasion, understand the science of persuading the public, or certain segments of the public, to buy their "product." Congratulations on being perceptive enough to not have been taken in by the marketing of the Iraq invasion, but there's really no way it could have happened without the able assistance of the MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lxlxlxl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Fear the simplifiers
Here Here...

I think retreating to the MSM critique is partially desperation in the face of complexity, which I can sympathize with. People have to work hard
to survive and I think that can be detrimental to education and perspective.

Overall though, it's become way too tempting to use "the media" as a coverall when convenient -- a cheap argument.

I am especially suspicious of arguments that both "The Right" and "The Left" can throw out there to prove why they are right.

Now clearly, liberals have made critiques of media that are far more interesting and relevant than any conservatives, but even our approaches to
propaganda and corporate ownership have turned into this paranoid monster that has turned some well-meaning people into thinking everything beyond
what they see what their own eyes is controlled. That is simply not true.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Batgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. then hopefully you won't find this too upsetting
http://www.counterpunch.org/stclair06122007.html

"It could have been different. All of the holes in the Bush administration's gossamer case for war were right there for the mainstream press to expose. Instead, the U.S. press, just like the oil companies, sought to commercialize the Iraq war and profit from the invasions. They didn't want to deal with uncomfortable facts or present voices of dissent.

Nothing sums up this unctuous approach more brazenly than MSNBC's firing of liberal talk show host Phil Donahue on the eve of the war. The network replaced the Donahue Show with a running segment called Countdown: Iraq, featuring the usual nightly coterie of retired generals, security flacks, and other cheerleaders for invasion. The network's executives blamed the cancellation on sagging ratings. In fact, during its run Donahue's show attracted more viewers than any other program on the network. The real reason for the pre-emptive strike on Donahue was spelled out in an internal memo from anxious executives at NBC. Donahue, the memo said, offered "a difficult face for NBC in a time of war. He seems to delight in presenting guests who are anti-war, anti-Bush and skeptical of the administration's motives."

The memo warned that Donahue's show risked tarring MSNBC as an unpatriotic network, "a home for liberal anti-war agenda at the same time that our competitors are waving the flag at every opportunity." So, with scarcely a second thought, the honchos at MSNBC gave Donahue the boot and hoisted the battle flag.

It's war that sells.

There's a helluva caveat, of course. Once you buy it, the merchants of war accept no returns."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't think we ride their mendacious @sses enough.
Their job is to inform, not to sell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. the MSM....
....exists by and for the corporate interest....their propaganda can never be trusted....most people have been trained to believe that the MSM are impartial purveyors of fact....

....Iraq has proven this to be a deadly combination....(are we still in Iraq?)....we can never blame the MSM too much....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC