|
I am personally acquainted with many of the farmers receiving subsidies. I don't know about the ones with corporate sounding names, because I don't know who owns them, but on that list are people that I have known for my entire life,including my brother in law, his father, friends of my sister, guys I used to date, relatives, so I know them WELL. Do scroll this all the way through for a small county in a place like Kentucky or Tennessee and then click on the breakdown per year
AND THOSE ARE 10 YEAR FIGURES for the grand totals. I suggest checking out the list farther in and you will see that what looks like a lot of money after breaking it out by crop and year, it isn't so much, especially the smaller independent farmers. My brother in law got $145K according to the summary page...over a 10 year period. The most he ever got in one year was $26K and almost $4K was a disaster subsidy,probably due to drought or maybe a barn fire. I know my sister is living in a nice little house, and they make ends meet and save money but she doesn't have a lot of money to throw around either. She is frugal by nature and necessity.
YES I RESENT THE HELL OUT OF THE CORPORATE FARMS THAT HAVE MOVED IN AND ARE REAPING ALL THIS MONEY THROUGH A PROGRAM DESIGNED ORIGINALLY TO HELP THE SMALL FARMER AND ENCOURAGE PROPER CROP MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION OF THE LAND. but I know what the small farmer faces every day and no matter what their politics, religion etc. I love them deeply and respect them tremendously for doing this work that they truly love. Because make no mistake, they LOVE what they do and they do it well. None of them would consider doing anything else it is in their blood.
HOWEVER I will say this:
the individuals with whom I am acquainted will also be riding the roller coaster of weather and other influences on the other crops they grow. Let's say the farmer has 2000 acres ..the subsidy is based on the farmer NOT planting the entire acreage in one crop every year. The farmers will naturally let a field lie fallow periodically to refresh it, this is good land management. So probably every one of these farms grows some wheat, some soybeans, some corn etc. Crop rotation, etc. They probably also have some type of livestock, cattle, pigs, dairy etc. which has to be paid for and fed.
The subsidies secure the farm against severe losses on the crops that are being grown in the event disaster strikes. Otherwise all the farmers would just collect the subsidy funds and move to Jamaica. Let me tell you, every person whose name I saw on that list that I recognized is a HARD WORKING sunrise to sunset worker, getting dirty, breathing dust, pollen, chemicals, risking severe disabling or fatal injuries, dealing with equipment failures and malfunctions and hoping the rain comes at just the right time and there isn't a flash fire that takes out the corn crop and the tobacco barn doesn't implode ( a major consideration there) and fixing the combine or the seed driller with wire and a prayer, and the increasing cost of fuel and other petroleum based necessities to run the farm ......irrigation costs..
OH yeah the insurance premiums on the house, the barns, the sheds, the equipment, the crops that are in the field, life insurance on the breadwinner. Even with the subsidies, things can get tight. Most of them are paying off notes on land purchased or remortgaged after a bad crop year; many of them also sub-farm land owned by others (old ladies, absentee owners etc) and get a commission on the crop; landowner gets income, farmer gets a cut. So all the expense involved in working someone else's land is theirs ..and we haven't gotten to actual living expenses, this is just business expense
And I know farmers who are working their butts off in the field and also have second jobs. Don't know how much subsidy money they are getting, they are not on the list, unless farm name is how they are listed and I don't recognize it.
So as in everything else there are always two sides to every story. This is my city girl point of view of my roots.
|