Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

*THIS* is why we need habeas corpus for EVERYONE, not just US Citizens.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 11:17 AM
Original message
*THIS* is why we need habeas corpus for EVERYONE, not just US Citizens.
"Masri, a Lebanese-born German, claims he was abducted by US agents in Macedonia in 2003 and taken to Afghanistan where he was jailed and tortured before being released without charge five months later."


Someone called in to an Air America show I was listening to last week and commented that we don't need habeas corpus for non citizens, because "we need to fight the war on terror." The host rightly asked the caller, how do you know these people are terrorists? The answer is, you don't. There is no way to know if these people in Guantanamo or in the secret prisons, or anywhere, are really terrorists, or if they were randomly picked up off the street. The fact that we still have habeas corpus for US Citizens is besides the point. If we want to be a civilized nation, we need it for all people charged, in all cases.

Here's the complete article:

US pressed Germany not to issue CIA warrants: report
Published: Sunday March 4, 2007

http://rawstory.com/news/afp/US_pressed_Germany_not_to_issue_CIA_03042007.html

Senior US diplomats put pressure on Germany not to prosecute 13 people linked to the alleged CIA-backed abduction of a German, a German magazine reports in its issue appearing Monday.

The diplomats "repeatedly" contacted the German chancellery and justice ministry in recent weeks in a failed bid to block the issue of arrest warrants against the 13 suspected CIA co-workers, the news magazine Der Spiegel said.

A court in Munich in January ordered their arrest in connection with the case of Khaled el-Masri and the federal government decided late last month to issue the warrants.

Masri, a Lebanese-born German, claims he was abducted by US agents in Macedonia in 2003 and taken to Afghanistan where he was jailed and tortured before being released without charge five months later.

It is one of the most-high profile cases of alleged CIA "rendition" in which terror suspects are seized in one country and taken to another for questioning.

The case caused tension between Washington and Berlin in 2005 when Chancellor Angela Merkel said after a meeting with US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice that it "was accepted as a mistake by the US government."

Reports have indicated that US agents confused Masri with a suspect with a similar name who was linked to the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001.

Masri, 43, sued the US government for compensation, but a US federal appeals court on Friday upheld an earlier refusal to hear his case. It cited national security reasons.

The US government had argued that it could not confirm or deny Masri's allegations because they were related to the secret activities of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

The United States is not required to extradite US citizens on the basis of a German arrest warrant.

In a similar case, an Italian judge last week ordered 26 Americans to stand trial for the kidnapping of an Egyptian imam who was allegedly abducted in Milan and taken to a prison in Cairo.

A senior legal advisor at the US state department has said that the United States would not agree to Italy's request to extradite CIA officials.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Terrorists" are those who the Bush Administration doesn't like.
That is essentially their definiation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. that would probably include you and me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. It is amazing how many people are willing to throw the concept
of human rights out the window regarding people who are not U.S. citizens.

For one thing, it gives the government people it can treat that way, and the bureaucrats are going to like the power. We know the executive branch does.

For another, no foreigner is ever going to believe they deserve it, and it just breeds ill will.

It just goes against everything America stands for to say: there are a class of people (foreigners) who can be detained without cause and punished without trial. To be willing to treat anyone like this on mere ground of birth is appalling.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC