Salon: "Conservatives angry at Bush over his statement of regret" (his "morally bankrupt apology")

Wednesday, June 11, 2008 14:15 EDT

Conservatives angry at Bush over his statement of regret



http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/06/11/conservatives_bush/index.html

Here's a conundrum for conservative bloggers: When you've spent years attacking most of the critics of any part of the prosecution of the war in Iraq, and attacking those who criticize President Bush on the issue, what do you do when Bush makes some limited criticism of himself? Apparently, the answer is that you just attack Bush for being insufficiently loyal ... to himself.

As I mentioned in an earlier post, in a recent interview with a British newspaper, Bush mentioned one regret he has about the war. "I think that in retrospect I could have used a different tone, a different rhetoric," Bush said. Phrases like "bring them on" and "dead or alive," he said, "indicated to people that I was, you know, not a man of peace."

Michelle Malkin was one very predictable source of indignation about this, and she played to type. Her post on the comments is titled "Bush Goes Mushy." In it, she quips, "He's putting the lame in lame duck."

Similarly indignant, if more strident, was Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs. Geller called Bush's interview "pathetic," wrote, "Memo to Bush: STFU" (her emphasis) and said, "Bush regrets his legacy as a 'man who wanted war?' ... It was not your legacy, it was al qaeda and company's legacy. Not aggressively defending ourselves is a moral depravity. Apologizing for defending this great nation is morally bankrupt."

One of Hinderaker's co-bloggers, Paul Mirengoff, concurred, writing, "Bush seems determined to drive his approval rating down to roughly zero percent."