Bush "strongly disagrees" with Supreme Court. Will "study" habeas ruling.

Funny, he love the Court when it's selecting Presidents.

====

ROME - President Bush on Thursday strongly disagreed with a Supreme Court ruling that clears foreign terrorism suspects at Guantanamo Bay to challenge their detention in U.S. civilian courts. Bush suggested new legislation may now be needed to keep the American people safe.

"We'll abide by the court's decision," Bush said during a news conference in Rome. "That doesn't mean I have to agree with it." The court's decision was sure to be popular in Europe, where many leaders have called for the closing of of Guantanamo.

In its third rebuke of the Bush administration's treatment of prisoners, the court ruled 5-4 that the government is violating the rights of prisoners being held indefinitely and without charges at the U.S. naval base in Cuba. The court's liberal justices were in the majority.

"It was a deeply divided court, and I strongly agree with those who dissented," Bush said. "And that dissent was based upon their serious concerns about U.S. national security." Bush said his administration will study the ruling. "We'll do this with this in mind — to determine whether or not additional legislation might be appropriate so we can safely say to the American people, 'We're doing everything we can to protect you.'"


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/bush_europe

nothin' he can do about this. I hope he continues to gripe so everyone who is vaguely paying attention can hear him quack!

:dunce:

Does that mean that Bush will try to find a way to circumvent the ruling?

...it means that he WILL circumvent it whenever he damn well pleases.

And dare the Supremes and/or Congress and/or the American people and/or the rest of the world, to do anything about it.

That is, sadly, where we are right now.

What a total bastard he is.

I hope he does not think he can make signing statements about SC decisions. He does that with laws passed by Congress.

He will however just plain ignore it.

-Hoot

His rejection of the courts decision has nothing to do with the constitutional issues involved, and everything to do with "national security." Which at this point means letting him do whatever he wants.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Longest 8 years of our lives.

Bush study somehthing? :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

to understand it even on a shallow level, much less figure out what the crux of the matter was.

Our courts deal with bad guys all the time. We try murderers, rapists, drug dealers and all kinds of nefarious criminals. Seems our legal system can handle the alledged terrorists at Gitmo.

to give god like powers to the Chimpander and thief.

Note to Idiot in chief Fuck off you loose.

Mother Goose nursery rhyme. To quote the big dick - go fuck yourself W!

His name is Kucinich.

Doesn't matter that there's nothing for him to sign; he'll try anyway, lol.

that he leaves after wiping his ass with it.

I mean Bush could club baby seals in order to protect me, but I pretty sure I don't want him too.

Yeah, kinda like back when you had all of those teenage National Guardsmen running around our airports with unarmed M-16s.

That's why they call it 'Supreme', Chucko.

n/t

Your oath was to defend the Constitution. You do that, and I'll look to my own protection, thank you very much.

Busholini is a Rwing Fascist Asshole just like Scalia.

...Bush can never adequately address the "bin Laden Determined To Strike In U.S." brief he received and ignored in advance of 9/11.

SO...given the fact that he CAN'T tell the American people he's done everything possible to protect them, he substitutes "protection" with "denial of your rights" and that becomes "protection."

He's just catapultin' the propaganda, as always...

:patriot:

As a parting gift, you get this lovely Neocon Tiddlywinks Game.

Bush and study, seems like an oxy "moran".

A few months from now, he and his pals are gonna find out all about them.

(I hope)

One eye says I hate you and the other one is about to cry. I think he's afraid.

'We're doing everything we can to protect you.'" ...from finding out what we're really doing to you.

It would be so much easier if it were a dictatorship, and he were the dictator! :sarcasm:

this comment has me doing this: :puke: and this :banghead:

"It was a deeply divided court, and I strongly agree with those who dissented," Bush said. "And that dissent was based upon their serious concerns about U.S. national security." Bush said his administration will study the ruling. "We'll do this with this in mind — to determine whether or not additional legislation might be appropriate so we can safely say to the American people, 'We're doing everything we can to protect you.'"




oh, bushie we do NOT need you to protect us!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Executive Sumary
---------------
See US Constitution and western law since the Magna Carta

2 page PDB's (which no one had ever heard of PDB's being less than 10 pages) at that

We know how that story ends!

and probably acted out in pantomime and charades by Condi while Bush dines on Rice Crispies in the morning.

let them get away to do more bad things. So the king had to do it all over again, because only he knew the real dangers."

an ugly kind of pissed. I can't wait till this cretin leaves the WH.

using * and study in the title...together! :rofl:

thought about protecting us before 9/11?

the greatest hits?

What a joke! K&R, Bluebear! :kick:

yeah, he'll "study" it..:eyes:

Hey prissy-pants, you're a war criminal dude, study that!...:puke:

and understand. Big words aren't his specialty, ya know..

like you give a rat's ass about We The People, you fucking a-hole!

I live for the day this war criminal and plunderer of the people's treasury and professional liar and mass murderer is tried and found GUILTY in war crimes court, along with his fellow conspirators and mass murderers.

IMPEACH, INDICT, IMPRISON the ENTIRE BUSH ADMINISTRATION

"concern for national security." That's not interpretation of the law at all.

when you dare to bother her or irritate her. Lana is quite the princess.

Like *, here. OMG, the SC didn't return the ruling he wanted so he's just going to hold his breath...

be a product of a bubbling cauldron....evil stuff! What's the warlock thinking about? Maybe a sequel to the Military Commissions Act? Gee, I felt safer when that came to be,didn't you? :sarcasm:

would see the reason in the Court's decision.

:grr:

"totally geeking out" (her words) on the decision. She spent hours studying it. (She's a Rhode's scholar). She's so excited she can hardly contain herself. It's very amusing to listen to Rachel. She just called it her "civics porn"

:rofl:

There is no way he can get what he wants on this. He is stuck.

he wants Congress to give him a "tool", sounds like he wants Congress to cover his ass.

...there's gonna be a bourbon run.