|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 03:42 PM Original message |
Dominant, aggressive women more likely to produce sons, study finds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. Shouldn't that be "produce bulls"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
2. I thought the sex was determined by the father. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 03:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Oh, why let THAT little fact ruin such a headline-grabbing theory? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. It is, but most sperm don't make it (of course), and most fertilized eggs aren't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 03:51 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. according to the study... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 03:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Ahhh! So, the "aggressive" females have dominating eggs that pick and choose sperm!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 03:57 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Except the study was of cows, not women. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kimmerspixelated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 04:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
17. Me, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 05:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
19. True - but not that simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DiverDave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
3. huh, we have 2 boys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madam Mossfern (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
4. Hmmmm...... I have three sons and one daughter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
6. Wow. Science is so smart. They can couple it with their lesbian/gay study |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YOY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
7. So far only one daughter... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
9. I have two girls, so does that make me a wuss? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Think of it as passing on your dominant genes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
11. And the bullshit, what did they say about dat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
15. I'm an exception |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SmokingJacket (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
16. I'm very wimpy, yet I have two boys. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
18. That's interesting HRC only had Chelsea and Michelle Obama has 2 girls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 04:34 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC