Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court Reverses Gore Endorsement, Awarding it to McCain

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 05:01 PM
Original message
Supreme Court Reverses Gore Endorsement, Awarding it to McCain
Edited on Tue Jun-17-08 05:02 PM by kpete
Supreme Court Reverses Gore Endorsement, Awarding it to McCain
June 17, 2008 · No Comments
by Jake Maccoby and Jordan Zakarin

Mere moments after formally announcing his backing for Democratic Presidential nominee Barack Obama in an email to supporters, former Vice President Al Gore’s endorsement was blocked and reversed by a 5-4 Supreme Court decision, handing the Nobel Prize winner’s full throated support to Republican nominee John McCain.

Writing for the majority, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said that regardless of who Gore intended to support, a strict constructionist reading of his statement made it clear that, from a legal standpoint, his endorsement must be awarded to the GOP candidate.

“It is plainly obvious, by reading Section One, Clause Four of Article Two, that the framers, Jefferson, Madison and Hamilton, were firm in their resolve, that in the 2008 Presidential election, 219 years after ratification, former Vice President Gore, who the constitution also stipulated must lose the 2000 Presidential election regardless of the voters’ wishes, would be required to hand his endorsement and considerable public influence to John McCain, who was himself one of the original framers of Constitution,” Scalia wrote.

Seconds after the ruling, Charlie Black, a spokesman for the McCain campaign, said that “Senator McCain is gratified and humbled by the support of Vice President Gore, and he urges the American people to unite behind him for the good of the nation.”

more at:
http://reallyseriousnews.wordpress.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sad LOL; K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Scalia and that damned Equal Protection Clause again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. I always thoght that Charlie Black was a slick piece of sh*t. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taylor Mason Powell Donating Member (681 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm beginning to see a trend here...
Supreme Court Gives Gore's Oscar to Bush

Supreme Court Gives Gore's Nobel to Bush


(Wow, Borowitz used the same joke twice in seven months!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's the presentation, not the joke.
It's like "The Aristocrats" gag. Every comedian has to have their own stamp on it to prove they're worthy. Additionally, demeaning the SC and their past rulings, as a joke, and getting it out in front of those who may still vote (R) in November may have the effect of putting a bug in their ear.

It certainly couldn't hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I'm surprised the GOP-controlled media didn't just say...
...the decision is pending the Supreme's ruling.

Or, saying it's too close to call.

The joke may have been heard before, but that doesn't make it less funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LordJFT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. bwahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC