Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I believe the reason the Dems caved in is that

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 07:22 PM
Original message
I believe the reason the Dems caved in is that
Edited on Fri Jun-20-08 07:27 PM by malaise
they do not want to be blamed for another attack and there is no way McSame is a viable candidate, so with my tin foil hat, I understand. As Dean is saying the 'fear factor' won out.
That said it is a very bad day for civil liberties.

Gr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Probably. But it's sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
appal_jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
24. Sad & UNCONSTITUTIONAL
It's right there in our Constitution, plain as day:

"No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed."

Article 1, Section 9. See for yourself:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.ar...

"ex post facto" = 'after the fact' = RETROACTIVE


:grr:

Now, who's got the money for a lawsuit?

-app
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. That is no excuse, they caved because they are more concerned with keeping their own power...
rather than preserving the civil rights of the citizenry. They have nothing but contempt for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Excuse me, but horse shit!
It matters not what Democrats do. They will be painted with the same broad brush.

Truth, lies, it does not matter. The republican talking-points always "win."

Democrats are now being blamed for the high price at the gas station. Is that truth? Or spin?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Then their vote of support cannot be seen as Nobel but Cowardly!
Nancy and Reid must go along with the other cowards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Collaboration by any other name is still collaboration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobRossi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. More likely....
There is no difference between them and repukers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. If that were true
We wouldn't have had any of the hearings in either the House or the Senate and without those hearings people would not have known about all the lies and all the violations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think they caved because they are unprincipled cowards
they are all professional pols looking out for number one, every one of them, no exceptions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well both Jonathan Turley and John Dean, who are
supposed to know more about the Constitution than us more or less said that our government is fucked on both sides of the aisle. They said they are afraid of being guilty of being complicit with a rogue government so they have to run out the clock to have enough time to go slinking back under their safe rocks. Not their words. Mine. But that's what they said more or less in carefully couched terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. And they are both correct
but Dean did raise the fear factor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. IT is called CYA... that is what they did since they are
part of the problem,

the leadership WAS briefed on the torture and all that and they didn't object

They are liable

It is CYA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Dems are not caving. They want to do what they are doing
They love it when people say they are caving. Caving means that they have their hearts in the right place but for very pressing reasons they are going against their better nature and caving.

These politicians do NOT have their hearts in the right places. They want these bad bills.

Dems are not caving. They are legislating exactly the way they intend to legislate.


This is the way they WANT it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. There's always a reason not to do the right thing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. They caved because they want to get re-elected, period.
It's a crass calculation of noting how many morons lie in your district who can be told untruths about a given congressperson's 'unpatriotism', and how many will believe it. West Virginia showed us even Dems still thought Obama was a Muslim, even when presented with proof he was not. The more of these genetic embarrassments lie in the district, the more the odds increase of the Dem not getting re-elected.

There was a way to get past this, a show of unity and force. Educating the public constantly about why you're voting this way, but that takes initiative and effort and the wherewithal to take a risk, and the those particular Dems are cowards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Oh I'll remember this when Ed Perlmutter comes up for re-election...
and I'll be telling him about it in the meantime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
15. if so then they need something new to fear...
perhaps losing their reliable and taken for granted constituency might be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. No doubt a clean up is required n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
17. If they can't be bothered to vote in my interests
Edited on Sat Jun-21-08 05:19 AM by crickets
never mind keep that oath about defending the Constitution, I hardly see why I should be bothered to vote for them.

they do not want to be blamed for another attack

If there's a credible threat of that, they should say so. We have that color coded alert crap for a reason, ya know. Also, we all know now they were *already* pulling this wiretapping stunt before September 2001. Wait, we still got attacked, right? I hardly think the government's lack of legal cover to listen in on the phone calls of millions of people in the US had anything to do with NORAD's stunning lack of response. If multiple warnings from intel offices of various nations around the world along with a certain "historical document" were not enough to let little bushiepants know we were in danger, that's no reason that, seven years later, I have to let someone listen in on my Dad calling me to ask if I bothered to mow my lawn lately.

Just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
20. There was NO WAY Dems could be blamed for another attack
The FISA system WASN'T BROKEN. It worked JUST FINE the way it was.

There were NEVER any instances where foreign calls COULDN'T be monitored. NONE.

And the FISA court was known as one of the most lenient in granting warrants. In it's ENTIRE HISTORY, it had only turned down a handful of warrants out of thousands of requests.

And furthermore, the government DIDN'T HAVE TO WAIT for a warrant because warrant requests could be issued retroactively.

The only thing this bill did was REMOVE the mandatory warrant review process, and place all power in the EXECUTIVE BRANCH..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
21. That was my theory about why they caved on the IWR, too
They were afraid that if they didn't vote for it, then the Bushies would "find" WMDs or there would be a false flag attack on the U.S.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
22. i don't buy that. they are complicit in the destruction of our democracy.
it weakens them politically

i plan to re-register as an independent and the democrats can have my vote if they earn it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
23. We have a Yellow Dog Congress
Ya get what ya vote for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC