|
Edited on Sat Jun-21-08 01:31 PM by Peace Patriot
--and which one is the worst problem--and here is my thinking:
Strategically, it is an issue of power. We have one POWER--our vote. That is an actual POWER--and it is the basis of our sovereignty as a people. It is not influence. It is not advocacy. It is not street protests and writing letters and boycotting, etc. It is real POWER--the method by which we choose the representatives who act on our behalf. And without that actual POWER, we have no ability to change the current corporate control of all news and opinion (except the internet). Corporate control of our PUBLIC TV/radio airwaves--and mega-monopoly control of virtually all media--has occurred as the result of legislation and other acts of government (appointments to regulatory bodies, fascist policy) that we have no actual power over without the power of the vote. We can write a million letters, etc., and sometimes get maybe a postponement of some particularly horrible action, but these monopolies remain entrenched, until we have REAL representatives of the people, voted into POWER, by us, in Washington DC--in Congress and in the White House.
Congress, the White House and the corporate 'news' monopolies simply IGNORE us--they are deaf to us--because we don't have the power of the vote any more. We vote, and we get more of the same. And the reason is 'TRADE SECRET' vote counting, which puts the final twist on an already putridly corrupt political system.
So I think we need to start there--with getting rid of these "TRADE SECRET" election theft machines. And one of the reasons I think that is also strategic--that ordinary people still have some influence at the local/state level. Your local Registrar of Voters may live down the street from you. That person may be appointed by the county board of supervisors, who are also closer to the people than members of Congress. Control over voting systems remains LOCAL. Congress has increasingly encroached on that local control, but it is still essentially a LOCAL decision, what voting method to use. And HAVA, interestingly, DOES NOT MANDATE electronic voting. It is a matter of money and corruption, not a legal requirement. Local officials are vulnerable on the vast amounts of money spent on these egregiously non-transparent--and very faulty and unreliable--electronic voting systems.
We cannot influence the New York Times, the Associated Pukes, NBC-ABC-CBS, Faux News, Time-Warner, et al. They don't give a fuck what we think. And they are furthermore moving as fast as they can to control the one beacon of freedom we have left--the internet. How do we stop that? We might PUT IT OFF by a million letters and phone calls. But they will, inexorably, shut off freedom of speech if we do not have REAL representatives of the people in Washington DC with the actual POWER to protect our interests.
The fast erosion of our rights and freedoms--not to mention the sheer costs of fascist tyranny (a $10 trillion dollar deficit, economic collapse, vast poverty)--will continue INEXORABLEY until we can restore transparent vote counting and start electing REAL leaders.
I can't argue with those working on media issues. How can a people even realize that their right to vote has been taken away, when that matter has been black-holed in the corporate 'news,' and by the goddamned leaders of our own political party? It IS happening--by word of mouth, via the internet and other informal means, with many citizen election reform movements activated in various states. But it is necessarily slow, to be sure--and would be bolstered by a free--or even a half honest--news media. This is rather a "chicken and egg" situation. What comes first--freedom of speech, or transparent vote counting? BOTH are vitally important.
But I think it comes down to strategy. Which of these things do we REALISTICALLY have a chance to reform--the corporate 'news' monopolies, or 'TRADE SECRET' vote counting? Efforts to create alternative news media should, of course, continue--as well as efforts to influence corporate media, if possible (we have no practical power over them any more). But we still have some practical power at the state/local level, to restore transparent vote counting, and the benefits of that are so great that we really MUST do it, and furthermore, we CAN do it. It is feasible and doable.
I don't know what these fascist corporate powers who now control the vote count are going to do to us in November. I rather think they will permit Obama to win--because, policy-wise, he is no threat to them (thus far)--but (in case he is a threat, as to reform) they will use their 'TRADE SECRET' code to significantly shave his mandate, and probably inflict him with a "Blue Dog" Congress (like the present one), that will blockade any real effort of reform, and keep the corporate looters and war profiteers in control. They are very worried about the American people--truly. (The installation of these highly riggable voting systems tells us just how worried they are.) They need a palliative--a government that will pretend to reform, and will throw a few sops to the peon masses--to keep us out of the streets, while they consolidate their enormous fascist gains under the Bush Junta. And after that, they make forget about us--who knows?--and move on to the better looting grounds of China and India. We may be an economic disaster area by 2012--not worth the bother to control. But if not--if there is anything left to exploit or loot (say, Obama rebuilds our broken military, or our creative, industrious citizens start turning things around with, say, alternative energy products)--they can EASILY re-install Bushites even worse than these. That may be their plan--blame Obama for Bush-created economic hardship, crash the dollar or whatever they need to do to make it impossible for the center-left to govern (Hitler's opportunity in the 1930s), and install Hitler II in 2012.
As long as they control the vote counting, they can do anything else they want to do. And we must keep our eye on the ball--restoring our fundamental power as a people--our vote--first of all by restoring vote counting that everyone can see and understand.
One more thing: In Feb. '03, nearly SIXTY PERCENT of the American people opposed the invasion of Iraq. SEVENTY PERCENT now oppose the war and want it ended. Are these stupid, uninformed 'sheeple'? Or are they a DISENFRANCHISED people? Do they need more information--or TRANSPARENT vote counting?
In South America, the media is the same as here--even worse, actually. Yet South Americans have elected good, leftist, social justice governments in Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, Paraguay, Chile, and, moving north, in Nicaragua and Guatemala. Same media situation. Different outcome. What is the key to this? The boffo work done by the OAS, the Carter Center, EU election monitoring groups, and many local social movements and civic groups, on TRANSPARENT vote counting and honest elections. The voters IGNORE their rancid, fascist, corporate-controlled media. Somehow they know who to vote for. And, after a decade of work on the fundamentals of honest elections, their votes are actually COUNTED.
I think it will take about a decade here, too. The best thing that has happened here are the Obama SUPPORTERS. An activated citizenry is THE most important element needed for election reform --and all reform. I hope to God they are not lulled to sleep by an Obama victory--and that they understand what has happened when his landslide is turned into a close shave.
|