Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A message for Obama, Clinton, Edwards, Biden, Dodd, Gravel, and Richardson voters regarding FISA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 04:55 PM
Original message
A message for Obama, Clinton, Edwards, Biden, Dodd, Gravel, and Richardson voters regarding FISA
Next time, vote for Kucinich.

And when a more liberal man or woman challenges your DINO Blue Dog incumbent, for for him or her as well.

Putting election fraud aside, it really is that simple.

Stop letting the mainstream media influence your vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you, but the mainstream media didn't influence my vote. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. i think it influenced everybody's vote
immensely. consider that kucinich was kept out of a nationally televised debate while he was still a candidate. one of my co-workers did not even know who he was when i told her he was my choice for president. as i mentioned previously, he wasn't even a name on my ballot by the time i voted. so msm definitely influenced my vote, by constricting my choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I understand the point you're making -
and I agree that the vast majority of Americans never got a chance to hear him. And it wasn't only that ABC debate - they wouldn't cover Biden, Dodd, Richardson, Kuchinich or Gravel in between debates, either.

For me, I saw every debate - and he participated in them all up until the one you mention - and I made up my own mind from watching the debates and then researching the candidates. The media didn't influence me personally, otherwise I would have been for Hillary or Obama from the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Anyone who ever called Kucinich "unelectable" was influenced by the corporate media.
Virtually without exception. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. So why is he not the nominee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I never called him unelectable -- but I agree with your statement.
I'm just saying the MSM didn't influence MY vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Sort of.
That Kucinich is unelectable in a national election may well be partly because of the mainstream media, but the perception that he is accurate.

So they may have changed the fact, but not the perception - the opposite of what the media usually does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. You seem to have a very different idea of what "perception" is and how it's created than I do.
It may be that one or both of us seriously underestimates the power of media, propaganda, public relations, and advertising. For my part, I'll just read some more Noam Chomsky.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. i would have if i could have
by the time it got to me my choices were obama, clinton, and gravel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. You could've done a write in. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. here in NC
i don't feel as if i have the luxury to do that - although you're right, i could have. but by the time we voted (NC) i really wanted obama over clinton so saw them as my only realistic choices and of course voted for obama. just as i will do in the GE. he's like, after all is said and done, my 5th or 6th choice for president. but i will vote for him, definitely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I understand.
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Take Dodd and Edwards out of that list!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conspirator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Edwards? I thought he was anti-corporate n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yes. That's basically the point.
Our voting mathematics is absurd. We're at about a -1000. Our choices are always:

A) Republican: -100
B) "Electable" Dem: -10 (who pretends to be a zero)
C) Unelectable Dem: +750

Vote for ZERO! We can't afford to go backwards even further!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. !
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'll second that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. Ahh but -- Should we take note of how TIM RUSSERT killed Dennis's credibility?
We've spent days *paying respect* to the guy who very effectively killed Dennis's credibility on national TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I haven't. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Yes. We should. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. happy to say
i didn't. i don't even have cable tv. actually, i would dispute that "we" spent those days doing that - "they" did that, meaning MSM. again, the fucking msm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
21. Have you seen this? Obama: I'll Fight To Strip Telecom Immunity From FISA
Obama: I'll Fight To Strip Telecom Immunity From FISA

Obama: I'll Fight To Strip Telecom Immunity From FISA
Posted by David S Morgan| Comments65


(CBS/AP) - Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., issued a statement in support of the House's update of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, but said he would try to strip a provision granting immunity to telecommunication companies when the bill comes to a vote in the Senate next week.

The House approved a compromise bill Friday that would set new electronic surveillance rules that would also shield telecoms from lawsuits arising from their participation in the government's warrantless eavesdropping on telephone and computer lines in the United States.

The government eavesdropped on American phone and computer lines for almost six years after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks without permission from the FISA Court, the special panel established for that purpose under the original 1978 law.

Some 40 lawsuits have been filed against the telecommunications companies by groups and individuals who say the Bush administration illegally monitored their phone calls or e-mails.

Obama said there is "little doubt" that the Bush Administration, with the cooperation of major telecommunications companies, "has abused authority and undermined the Constitution by intercepting the communications of innocent Americans without their knowledge or the required court orders."

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/06/21/politics/horserace/entry4200105.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. "he would try"... Does that mean he'll vote , NAY'?
The words he/M$M uses are so ambiguous! :grr:

It's like this is some deep dark secret.

WHY?? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC