Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats Cave on Telecom Immunity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 09:38 AM
Original message
Democrats Cave on Telecom Immunity
"political cowardice, pure and simple."


http://washingtonindependent.com/view/democrats-cave-on

In February, as the law authorizing the Bush administration's controversial warrantless wiretapping program was set to lapse, House Democrats brushed aside GOP threats and let the clock run out. Politically, the move was a gamble: White House officials had claimed the law -- including retroactive legal immunity for the phone companies that participated -- was necessary to protect the country from terrorist attacks. The administration pushed its message relentlessly.

To the delight of privacy and civil-liberties groups, however, the Democrats stood their ground.

"We must not fall prey to fear-mongers who claim that our intelligence community could 'go dark,'" House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said on the chamber floor at the time. "That is simply not true."

Four months later, a very different scenario is playing out on Capitol Hill, where congressional leaders on Thursday unveiled a new agreement to expand the administration's domestic wiretapping capabilities under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA. The bill would effectively lead to the dismissal of the roughly 40 civil suits currently pending against the telecom companies for allegedly violating the civil liberties of their customers.

snip

Bruce Ackerman, professor of law and political science at Yale University, characterized the Democrats' support for the proposal as "political cowardice, pure and simple."

"The fact is that the Democratic leadership in Congress has done absolutely nothing to make good on its electoral mandate of 2006," Ackerman wrote in an email. "It was elected to rein in the abuses of presidential power at home and abroad. And it is caving in -- despite the massive unpopularity of the president's policies."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. What happened in the four months between standing up to Bush and caving to him? NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. Countdown interview with GW Law Prof. Jonathan Turley
DEMOCRATS COLLUDING WITH BUSH TO GUT 4th AMENDMENT TO COVER THEIR OWN CULPABILITY

http://www.hotpotatomash.com/2008/06/democrats-collu.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Isn't it only "caving in" when you don't want something to happen?
Im more and more convinced the Democrats, as a party, have not been caving in at all. They are playing their hand and a role, whearas they will be the majority party (thus pacifying the masses of angry citizens), but in the end everyone got what they wanted (including the pacified American people). I am starting to see this as a big farce. It appears to be an orchestrated show to balance to powerful taking what they want against the rage of the people. So far, its working great, because every 8 years (despite nothing progressive being done), the people are happy again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC