Liberals "Deselected" for Plum Jobs at the Department of Justice

...We concluded that McDonald committed misconduct and violated Department policies and civil service law by considering political or

ideological affiliations in assessing Honors Program and SLIP candidates. (93)

We concluded that Elston violated federal law and Department policy by deselecting candidates based on their liberal affiliations. (94)

We also concluded that Elston committed misconduct, and violated federal law and Department policy, when he deselected candidates and denied appeals based on his perception of the political or ideological affiliations of the candidates. (96)

We also concluded that OARM Director DeFalaise did not adequately or timely address the concerns that were brought to his attention concerning the Screening Committee's deselections. (96)

Finally, we concluded that Acting Associate Attorney General Mercer did not adequately address the concerns

that were brought to his attention by several senior Department officials that the Screening Committee's deselections appeared to have been politicized. (97)...

An OARM employee ... recalled that one of the (deselected) candidates she raised to DeFalaise's attention was first in his law school class at Georgetown University, had clerked for a federal district court judge, and was currently clerking for a Second Circuit judge. (footnote 41: This candidate also had worked as a law clerk for Senator Russell Feingold, a Democrat, and for Human Rights Watch, but the OARM employee does not recall pointing out the candidate's political or ideological affiliations to DeFalaise at this time.) (59-60)...

(Records of applicants destroyed)

The Committee used paper copies of the applications on which Fridman and McDonald made handwritten notations about the applicants, but those documents were destroyed prior to the initiation of our investigation. (68,69) (emphasis mine)