|
Edited on Wed Jun-25-08 10:02 PM by stillcool47
by the legacy of war than we realize. For every single soldier there is a ripple effect. Please...Let me know if this post is too long, and I will edit it... Reevaluating Society's Perception of Shell Shock: By Annessa Cathleen Stagner West Texas State University The combination of traditional fighting techniques and new technology in World War I forced both soldiers and officers to face devastating situations that tested not only their courage, but also their mental strength as well. While society had taught men to be tough and brave at all times, many broke upon enduring the horrifying environment of the trenches. It is obvious that men's ability to hold on to such an extreme ideal of manhood was unrealistic; however, many men tried. Jessica Meyers quoted Private Miles, who explained his emotional conflict saying, "I was frightened out of my life at nighttime. I was jellified, but I was more afraid of people knowing that I was afraid-- just a sort of bravado-- I mustn't show them I was afraid." <1> Like private Miles, many men tried to suppress their emotions, stay in control, and live up society's standard of masculinity. The devastating impact of war on soldiers, however, quickly forced society to confront the inability of soldiers to maintain society's idealistic courage. Some returning soldiers suffered through nightmares, while others suffered physically, exhibiting nervous twitches, blindness, or limb dysfunction. <2> In 1915, physician C. S. Myers unknowingly acknowledged the result of soldier's mental conflict between idealistic courage and survival leading to a form of nervous disorder, which he termed shell shock. <3> While the government did not intend to allow shell shock to hold any legitimacy among its troops, experienced soldiers' and officers' traumatic experiences convinced to advocate for proper treatment of the shell-shocked soldiers. Virtually ignoring the existence of shell shock within common soldiers initially, Peter Leese suggested the government proceeded to improve treatment only as a result of strong public opinion.
The large number of soldiers affected by shell shock continues to engage World War I historians even today. "The heightened code of masculinity that dominated in wartime was intolerable to surprisingly large numbers of men." <4> Nearly 80,000 men in Britain were diagnosed with shell shock during the War, and the number of cases continued to rise after the War ended. Some estimates, including undiagnosed soldiers, claim 800,000 British cases and 15,000 American cases. <5> Shell shock was not just a disease of the common soldier either. Myra Schock acknowledged "historians have generally taken it for granted that officers experienced shell shock in far greater numbers than soldiers of other ranks." <6> Inevitably numerous soldiers from all ranks were diagnosed with shell shock, thus having a tremendous impact on all of society. http://www.wfa-usa.org/new/shellshock.htm
I've seen bodies ripped to pieces by bullets, blown into millions of scraps by bombs, and pierced by booby traps. I’ve smelled the stench of bodies burned. I’ve heard the air sound like it was boiling from rounds flying back and forth. I’ve lived an insanity others should never live..." -- Dennis Tenety, Fire in the Hole----
●-Michael C.C. Adams, The Best War Ever: America and World War II About 25-30 percent of WWII casualties were psychological cases; under very sever conditions that number could reach as high as 70-80 percent. In Italy, mental problems accounted for 56 percent of total casualties. On Okinawa, where fighting conditions were particularly horrific, 7,613 Americans died, 31,807 sustained physical wounds, and 26, 221 were mental casualties.-Adams, 95 Trying to repress feelings, they drank, gambled suffered paralyzing depression, and became inarticulately violent. A paratrooper’s wife would “sit for hours and just hold him when he shook.” Afterward, he started beating her and the children: “He became a brute.” And they divorced —-Adams, 150
Haunted by Mark D. Van Ells Did the soldiers of the Good War really come home psychologically unscathed by the horror and stress they experienced? Or did they simply suffer in silence? by Mark D. Van Ells For many, continued exposure to combat conditions wore them down. "It was not going into battle the one time, but the going back again and again, that finally got to you," " a sailor from the USS Yorktown told Jones in a Honolulu bar in May 1942. A navy veteran from Texas compared his service on a destroyer off the Tokyo mainland during the Okinawa campaign to a death sentence: They strap him in the electric chair, he can see the warden's hand on the switch, he knows he is going to die, and he waits all day. Then at the end of the day they come and get him, take him back to his cell, and all night the other prisoners try to kill him. The next day they come get him and strap him in the chair and he expects to die again--this goes on and on day and night for three months....--------------------------------- Despite the host of conflicting opinions about battle fatigue, few people questioned that combat had profound effects on the minds of soldiers. "We were all psychotic, inmates of the greatest madhouse of history," claimed Manchester. Two psychiatrists who worked with veterans after the war noted that "mild traumatic states...are almost universal among combat troops immediately after battle."
Some aspects of war are timeless. The emotional trauma it causes is one of themhttp://www.americainwwii.com/stories/haunted.htm
Da Nang, Vietnam. A young Marine private waits on the beach during the Marine landing. 08/03/1965
How many Americans served in each branch of the military in 1944? Army 7,994,750 Navy 2,981,365 Marines 475,604 How many Americans were drafted? 11,535,000 (61.2%) How many Americans volunteered for service? 6,332,000 (38%)
Interestingly, the least amount of data found on the various termed mental injuries, was the data on the Vietnam war. Instead of war-related, the Post Vietnam Syndrome seems to have been caused by poor discipline and the lack of public support on their return from war.(???) Not surprising there is still a debate about the numbers of Vietnam Veterans that experience, or are still experiencing results from that particular causation.
Battle Continues Over Vietnam PTSD NumbersBy Amanda Gardner HealthDay Reporter http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art...THURSDAY, Aug. 23 (HealthDay News) -- Decades after the last U.S. troops departed Vietnam, the debate still rages on how many veterans of that conflict suffered or still suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder ----------------- Last August, a paper published in the prestigious journal Science downgraded the estimated percentage of Vietnam veterans suffering from PTSD to an 18.7 percent lifetime prevalence rate and 9.2 percent current rate. The variance, the authors stated, was due to differences in how they defined PTSD. ------------------------------------- Somewhere in all this heated back-and-forth, Dohrenwend contends that the main messages of his 2006 paper have been lost. "The most important results have been underemphasized, and that is the dose/response relationship, and that's about as close as you can come to a causal relationship," he said. "The other thing is the rate of 1-in-5 war-related onset of PTSD and 1-in-10 still current after the war of impairing PTSD. That is far from trivial. This is a heavy cost by any count" ****** The syndrome we call Vietnam combat reaction should be classified as a neurosis by virtue of being precipitated by repeated severe psychic trauma and developing over a relative prolonged period of time. . . . Another distinctive trait of this syndrome is the nearly identical case histories of its development from men of widely separated units whose only common denominator is participating in combat in Vietnam.
Vietnam War Veterans Win Legal Victory (July 20, 2007)--Vietnam War veterans who were exposed to Agent Orange and contracted a form of leukemia have won a legal victory.A federal appeals court in San Francisco has ordered the Department of Veterans Affairs to pay retroactive benefits to those veterans. It's not yet known how much the department would have to pay under the order or how many veterans would be affected. The VA agreed in 2003 to extend benefits to Vietnam vets diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, known as CLL, which has been linked to Agent Orange exposure.
But the VA did not re-examine previous claims from veterans suffering from the ailment, nor did it pay them retroactive benefits, which was at the heart of the dispute.http://www.kwtx.com/nationalnews/headlines/8626847.html
What is Agent Orange? http://hss.co.san-bernardino.ca.us/va/1-AgentOrange.htm
|