Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

28 FF Bra size

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:37 AM
Original message
28 FF Bra size
My niece went through Miami International Airport last week, where they have the new body-scanning technoloy :eyes:

She TRULY is a 28FF.

Her father didn't get scanned, her three younger sisters (with much more typical 'body types) didn't get scanned.....but she was "called out". She said she was put into some sort of glass cage.....then blasted/blown with air and then this GUY who was reading the scanner 'let her pass' (b/c he deemed that she, rightfully so, wasn't a terrorist/carrying any weapons (or boobs) or mass destruction.

I'm livid. Horrified. Appalled. The creeps running this country (into the ground) make me want to VOMIT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not even Orwell thought of some of the fascist shit going on in this country.
Edited on Thu Jul-10-08 01:46 AM by GOPBasher
Sorry for your niece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. don't they usually have women to check other women ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
31. supposedly
the person doing the scanning has no idea who they are scanning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. The air puffer thing "smells" for explosives.
Unless they might have thought she had c4 in her bra, I'm not sure what her bra size has to do with that. I had to use one at TPA (they make everybody do it)- takes forever, I almost missed my flight home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poverlay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Did these scanner folks make some comments or leer at her? I mean, did they give you/her any other
reason for your assumption that her breasts were the reason she was singled out?

I'm not discounting your feelings. You are likely spot on, but it is possible that she was just randomly picked isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I wasn't there......
the sense that her dad got was that "they wanted to look at her boobs" thru the body scanner.....and not for 'bomb purposes' either.

At least my brother (her dad) got the 'scanner guys' name (to complain)....and YES, women should be sent to one line (if there NEEDS TO BE A LINE AT ALL, which there DOESN'T)....and men sent to another line......men for men, women for women.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
49. Does your niece know you are posting her breast size online?
Thinking you might have a bit of concern over that privacy issue. The machine she went in did not give anyone the ability to look at her boobs as it puffs air on a person then tests the air.

However, now you have opened her physical constitution up for all sorts of random breast comments here.

If someone did that about me, I'd be upset with them. But hey, that's just me and my weird privacy issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #49
55. The subject line had me shaking my head...
:freak::wtf::freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThatsMyBarack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. Me, too.
I thought it was a Lounge item.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Did they actually say what her bra size was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. Little 'peep show' going on at the body scanning machine......
to say THE VERY LEAST!

At the VERY LEAST there should be lines for men and women.....but the whole body scanning thing is WRONG, WRONG, WRONG. An invasion of privacy and automatically assuming 'guilt' when there is no indication of anyone posing any harm in the first place.

Oh WAIT! That's ONE of our Constitutional Rights, isn't it???? *gasp*

We're all INNOCENT, until there is a REASONABLE reason that we be searched, seized, our things, our bodies scanned, scrutinized for illegal/dangerous activity........

My niece is a US citizen and my niece committed NO CRIME - had NO INTENTION of committing a crime, did not commit a crime - and under the 'protection of the Constitution of the United States of America, she was MOLESTED that day ~ by TSA (and "homeland security", make no mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. As I explained upthread, the machine that blows air on you is an explosives sensor
It isn't used to look at people, only to "smell" for chemical compounds associated with explosives.

Calm down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. And afterward of the 'chemical sniffing' is a body scan, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. That's a totally different machine.
If all she did was stand in the little machine with the glass doors that puffs air at you, no she wasn't body scanned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. but, but, but she has HUGH breastises! What other explanation could there be!!!???!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. I wanted to ask if she's single
But I don't think the OP would react well to that.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
38. Bats. They were looking for terrorist bats.
Obviously!

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Poor bastards, just wait until they see those fucking bats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. Well, she doesn't know WHAT THE HELL SHE WAS SUBJECTED TO....
she wasn't allowed to ask questions (that would just make it all 'worse/last longer') ..... don't tell me that was well within her "rights" to ask....

BULLSHIT.....her 'rights', per the Constitution were ALREADY BEING VIOLATED!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. I'm going to tell you what I told my son when he was two.
I have better things to do than put up with tantrums. I'll be in another room, please let me know when you're ready to behave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. oh puh-leese........
This isn't a tantrum. It's a discussion about illegal/unwarranted searches - invasion of privacy issues and more .....

If you really 'believed' this to be a "tantrum"....you wouldn't even being replying to me. You'd have me on 'ignore' OR just 'skip over this thread'....

But instead this thread hits enough of a 'discordant' view of yours, that you took the time to read, consider, respond to it. Thank you for the affirmation (of a sort) and hope you enjoy "the OTHER room" :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. As has been stated many times...there's nothing illegal about it.
She consented to the search when she bought the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
54. duzy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #22
42. Sorry that you've missed the last 8 years but the Constitution is worthless now
Welcome to the new Murika.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
78. Here us some info on this machine (puffer) that LIMITS patdowns
http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2006-01-09-tsa-puffer-machines_x.htm
There are now 24 airports with the walkthrough machines, which puff air onto a person to dislodge tiny particles from skin and clothing. The machine sucks up the particles and then analyzes them for traces of explosives.

One of the biggest weaknesses in U.S. airport security has been the limited ability to detect bombs on passengers. Government screeners have relied largely on patdowns, which are unpopular, time-consuming and incomplete. (More news on airport security: See additional coverage in Today in the Sky)

In contrast, a puffer machine takes 17 seconds to check a passenger and can analyze particles as small as one-billionth of a gram.

"It's more comprehensive and more accurate and it limits the number of patdowns," said TSA spokesman Darrin Kayser. ...(more@link)


It LIMITS patdowns. Making sure you saw that part.

http://discovermagazine.com/2006/oct/air-puffer-explosive-airport
The No-Touch Pat-Down

One of the latest—and most amusing—gizmos in airport security: the air puffer



The puffer machine is what the TSA calls an "explosive trace portal­­," a state-of-the-art device capable of detecting traces of explosive residue on a person's body or clothing. Since the summer of 2004, the TSA has installed more than 90 puffer machines in about 35 airports around the country. The puffers are more advanced and less obtrusive than other screening procedures, such as full-body pat-downs, says TSA spokeswoman Anne Davis.

The puff-down works like this: Air jets strategically positioned inside the booth send 37 blasts of air onto the person's body, dislodging particles from the clothing, skin, and hair. The swirling dislodged particles travel upward with the human convection plume, or currents of warmed air that rise around any human body, then get swept into a filter that takes out contaminants like dust, lint, and skin cells.

The resulting vapors are sent to an ion-mobility-spectrometry "trap," where captured molecules are ionized and then blown through a tube containing an electromagnetic field. Each type of ion travels through the field at a certain distinctive speed: the smaller and more charged the ion, the faster it moves and the sooner it arrives at the end of the tube. The ions' flight times are measured and then compared to a database of times for known compounds, including those of bomb ingredients. If explosives are detected, an alarm sounds. While smaller, simpler versions of trace detectors have long been used in airports to analyze cloths rubbed over passengers' carry-on bags, the puffer machine quickly scans the whole person by puffing and then analyzing the samples immediately....(more@link)


From TSA itself:
http://www.tsa.gov/approach/tech/trace_portals.shtm
These machines blow puffs of air on a traveler, which it then analyzes for trace amounts of explosives. Even the tiniest amount of explosive is no match for a trace portal. Better yet, these great assets to our work can be instantly updated through our vast information technology network to stay ahead of the curve.


Now, here is the info on the see through clothing machine (Backscatter), which she did NOT go through as there is NO puffing there. I know it's wiki but there are links there:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backscatter_X-ray
n contrast to the traditional X-ray machine, which detects hard and soft materials by the variation in transmission through the target, backscatter X-ray is a newer imaging system which detects the radiation which comes back from the target. It has potential applications in almost every situation in which non-destructive examination is required, but only one side is available for examination. One application currently under exploration is to perform a security scan of airline passengers.



From TSA: http://www.tsa.gov/approach/tech/body_imaging.shtm
In the current pilot phase at PHX, backscatter is being used during secondary screening, on a voluntary basis, as an alternative to the traditional pat-down. To date, approximately 79 percent of passengers have opted to try backscatter rather than undergo a pat-down. The millimeter wave unit will also be positioned in secondary screening as a voluntary alternative to a pat-down.

Images will not be printed, stored or transmitted

To ensure privacy, the passenger imaging technology being tested by TSA has zero storage capability and images will not be printed stored or transmitted. Once the transportation security officer has viewed the image and resolved anomalies, the image is erased from the screen permanently. The officer is unable to print, export, store or transmit the image.
Screener viewing images is remotely located

In addition to not storing, printing or transmitting the image, the transportation security officer will be viewing the image on a stand-alone machine (vs. network) that is located in a remote area from the screening process. The image will not be visible to the public, and the viewing TSO will not be permitted to bring any camera into the viewing area. The transportation security officer attending to the passenger at the machine is unable to see the image being produced. Communications between the attending TSO and viewing TSO are accomplished by a red light/green light system.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
43. No. That is totally different machine. My dad got "puffed" once also.
They picked an elderly man out of the line and "puffed" him. Should I be upset because of this? No. It happens, they chose people and blow air on them to see if any explosive residue comes off.

The puffer is NOT the body scanning, see under clothing machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. To get a "grip" on what's under discussion here, I had to Google it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. What's your point?
This is rudimentary information, even if it may be 'new' to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. "Rudimentary information" is more or less gender-specific.
I failed to "qualify", so I had to Google. Do you have a problem with that?

pnorman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Nope - knowledge is good. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanctified Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
13. I had to go through one of those one time, it never occured to me that they were really looking at
my penis and not for explosives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Bored females look for penis's (what's the plural peonias?)
ALL the time! :eyes:

(wish I could find that pic of the Olympic swimmer with the new Razr swimsuit....now THAT was HOT. But, ehm, he wanted to 'show off'.....my niece did not, and didn't appreciate some anonomous TSA guy forcing her into a glass cage and x-raying/scanning/looking at her body!!!!!!)

ACCCCCCCCKKKK!!!! I'm SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ANGRY!!!!!

FUCK THE AIRLINES WHEN THEY ALL GOT TOGETHER AND ASKED FOR "help" FROM TRAVELERS TODAY!

:angry: :angry: :angry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
45. I doubt they're looking for more than one
... at a time. :dunce: :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #19
83. Peni. (pee-neye). nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
15. This thread is worthless without pictures
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. i completely agree!
and yes that body scan crap is utter bullshit!!!!!
welcome to de fuhrer's amerika!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Efilroft Sul Donating Member (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
33. As a non-paying poster here, I saw a Macy's bra ad with the OP.
Nice pic, for what it's worth.

Just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
18. I am anxiously waiting for my next airplane ride...
I have two breast prostheses. If they say "Show me your boobs", they will be the ones embarrassed. :)

That brings up a point I have not yet seen discussed. Suppose I had a breast implant filled with plastic explosive? Would that show up on an airport scan?

Inquiring minds want to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanctified Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. I assume they would or terrorists would be packing their asses full of plastic explosives. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
24. There's not even ONE 'recommend' for this thread?
Illegal 'search & seizure' is an important issue. Constitutionally protected. It's an important issue to discuss and PROTECT.

Body scans at the airport are CLEARLY "illegal searches".

How far down the 'slippery slope' do you want to fall? Do you want to fall far enough that you can't get back up again? If 'we' don't say/do anything that's where we will find ourselves....too far gone. Maybe it's too late already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. i am not getting it
by purchasing an airline ticket and entering the airport you are agreeing to be (possibly) subjected to a search. How do you KNOW she was body scanned so they could check out her breasts? I am sorry you are so upset but if this bothers you or anybody else, perhaps you should drive or take the train.

I travel almost 1 million miles per year by plane - i have been scanned, sniffed and felt up more times than I can count - it is part of the deal. I now drive whenever I can, KNOWING FULL WELL that once i buy a ticket and enter the airport I have to abide by the fucking moronic policies the TSA sets.

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. not illegal at all, not even a little bit
You agree to be searched when you buy the tickets.

You've already been told multiple times upthread that the glass box with the air blowing thingie is an explosives sniffer, not an imaging device, yet you persist in yowling about pervs violating rights.

Yeah, I'd say you're AT LEAST one toke over the line... paranoia is the destroyer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #28
82. Just because it's "legal" doesn't mean it's not creepy as hell. . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. I guess your thread just isn't as good as you thought it was. I gave it a rec for the breastises
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
47. Exactly - At least know what you're talking about before you get outraged.
Oh that's right, knowing something isn't a prerequisite before posting on the internets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #24
36. Can someone tell me what's in the water here lately?
'Cause I really think I need some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #24
44. What you describe was NOT a body scan, hence no recs.
I had a daypack wiped down, looking for explosive residue. This is the same thing. No, I didn't freak out or be upset about "illegal searches" since, though I think they are assinine, they are legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lifetimedem Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
30. I am old
But I have also been singled out for the "puffer"

It is not an xray machine it is checking for explosives on someones person.

Personally I am sick of American citizens , young and old being treated as terrorists.

They won you know? We have all lost our personal freedom ...that is the goal of terrorists
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #30
41. They won you know? .. yes, i know. and many dont. many
on this very board does not see a problem with it.

i even hear about putting a taser bracelet on passengers. zap them into wanted behavior. and yet... there will be those that say it is for our protection and if you do nothing wrong you have nothing to worry about

i am old too.

i stopped going on planes. i refuse to let go of all rights and pay for it

but i have children that are going to be a part of this world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lifetimedem Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #41
73. I know...
Tell them that their email is being read, their phone tapped .

Tell them they have to strip at the airport, and all they will say is "I do not have anything to hide, so what"?

They do not understand that they have given up the very rights that made America free.

Like you, I worry for my children and the nation that they will live in .

Old people stripped, searched, forced through metal detectors that their hip makes buzz, bare footed citizens humiliated for NOTHING.
Last time I flew I had a nice note from the TSA, they went through my dirty underwear and determined I was no threat... there is nothing personal or secret anymore.


Fear has won over freedom

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteelPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
34. I'm not sure what you're angry about
Are you angry that they can scan people either passively or actively at airport security?

Or are you ok with the fact that they have that available to scan suspicious people, but not randomly?

Or are you ok with random searches and scans at airports, but you just think they pulled your neice aside to leer at her?

what precisely is the issue here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tracer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
35. I don't know what kind of machine is was, but ...
... if it was a body scanner, you have the right to refuse to go through it. The alternative is to be wanded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
37. I HATE the Miami airport. Having had a hip replacement a year ago, I now never
clear security at any airport. It's gotten to be routine to get felt up (yes they have women)
every time I fly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
40. The "puffer" machine and the backscatter machine are not the same.
From your description, it sounds as if she went through the puffer, which blasts air against a person and then checks it for residue of explosives without performing any optical scanning, and not the backscatter x-ray, which produces an image as if the person were naked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
46. Does your niece know you are posting her bra size on an internet forum?
Curious about privacy issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Ha! This was my 1st thought, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. She was MOLESTED by having air blown over here, so I'm going to post her HUGE BOOB SIZE on a forum
and really, they ARE THAT BIG!!!!!

I'd be pissed. Maybe OP could rethink, or ask to have it deleted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. ridiculous objection
We have zero idea who his niece is. We only know that somewhere out there someone has this breast size.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. But... how is it relevant to the "story"?
Really?

Oh, that's right, it's not. It just gets attention and makes it seem oh so much more shocking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #58
68. well he thought she
was selected out of the line because of the size. That may not be true, but it was thought to be relevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #50
62. the double-f part sounds big...but 28???
that's not that big around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #62
76. I don't imagine those are plausible dimensions.
It seems she would not be able to lower her arms to her sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. Mine, too. Not a lot of discretion in this post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
52. Creative uses of air-puffing explosive sniffers...
Edited on Thu Jul-10-08 04:00 PM by backscatter712
Did they arrange the air puffers to blow up from underneath to create the Marilyn Monroe effect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReverendDeuce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
56. Thread is worthless without **PICS**...
Please post pics. Tks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
57. Not a Body Scan
The puffer machine is a chemical sniffer and "blasting" is a bit over-the-top for what it does. I have seen everyone from beautiful women to 300 pound men to old ladies put through it. Sometimes you get singled out for a little extra security. I fly about 20 times a year, am nothing to look at and have been put through the sniffer twice.

You're assuming this was done because your niece has nice boobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #57
61. Yeah, but how big are your boobs?
sorry. I think the OP is outraged over not understanding what the test was and assuming they had an ulterior motive (to check out said niece's huge honkers) (sorry again. sun must be getting to me).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. I keep a coupe of oranges in my laptop case
Sometimes stuffing my shirt actually expedites the security process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. Now that was funny.
Get them focusing on the front of the shirt and they don't notice anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #66
72. It's the TSA after all
Can't spell TSA without the T&A*

(*Sorry, that was incredibly tasteless).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #57
63. The size reference was used to draw attention to the issue
of the body scan. It worked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. Except it wasn't a body scan, but a puffer to test residue blown into the air.
Different test. Not a body scan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aspergris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #57
81. I have perky chesticles
They are not 28ff though

And I have yet to be puffed. I DEMAND GENDER EQUALITY

I want equal attention applied to my perky chesticles.

To quote Johnny Cochrane "If you are not puffed, you MUST rebuff!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
60. If she TRULY is a 28FF, you should be more worried about her back than TSA.
That's a lot on a small frame and her health is at risk. That's the REAL story here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
67. That's a chemical sniffer, not a body scanner....


...and, quite frankly, having unusual body dimensions would seem to raise the question of whether that person may be carrying something, whereas not having unusual body dimensions would be less likely to raise that question.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
69. I am kinda grossed out that you KNOW your niece's bra size.
Ewww.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
70. Not sure I have ever heard of a 28 FF
She must have miserable back pain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #70
77. I was gonna say...
WTF?

Was that a typo in the OP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
71. charter jets are going to make a comeback
despite fuel prices and how ungreen it is if celebrities are going to be humiliated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
74. My husband was subjected to an inappropriate search
While sitting in his scooter type wheelchair. I won't go into details, takes too long. We complained to everybody from TSA to the Multiple Sclerosis Society to the ACLU. We're still pissed, especially when we found out the creepy fuck violated search protocols.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
75. Isn't this thread worthless without pictures?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
79. No. That's not how it happened.
I HATE it when uninformed people get on here and post conspiracy theories.

Your niece went through a sniffer - big deal! It sniffs for explosives. They have to select a certain percentage of customers every day.

She was selected randomly. By the computer. WHEN she checked in - not by the TSA, but at the counter a full 10-15 minutes BEFORE she got to security. I GUARANTEE you that she had a SSSS (quad-ess) mark on her boarding pass. Or it's even more likely that she paid cash or had a one-way ticket - that's the surest way to get to be a "selectee".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
80. Congratulations on choosing a title for the subject line that will
get the highest number of views possible!

I salute you...

:patriot:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #80
84. DUzy award just for the title! LOL nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
85. So uhm ...what did they think was going to explode?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
86. The perverted police state moves forward!!!!!!!!!
And congrats to whoever is matching ads with threads. You're cracking me up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC