Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FEINGOLD: "It Could Not Be Clearer...This President BROKE THE LAW"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 08:26 AM
Original message
FEINGOLD: "It Could Not Be Clearer...This President BROKE THE LAW"
Edited on Fri Jul-11-08 08:51 AM by kpete
FEINGOLD: "It Could Not Be Clearer...This President BROKE THE LAW"

"...it could not be clearer that this program broke the law, and this President broke the law. Not only that, but this administration affirmatively misled Congress and the American people about it for years before it finally became public."
...

"If Congress short-circuits these lawsuits, we will have lost a prime opportunity to finally achieve accountability for these years of law-breaking. That's why the administration has been fighting so hard for this immunity. It knows that the cases that have been brought directly against the government face much more difficult procedural barriers, and are unlikely to result in rulings on the merits."

...........

"I sit on the Intelligence and Judiciary Committees, and I am one of the few members of this body who has been fully briefed on the warrantless wiretapping program. And, based on what I know, I can promise that if more information is declassified about the program in the future, as is likely to happen either due to the Inspector General report, the election of a new President, or simply the passage of time, members of this body will regret that we passed this legislation. I am also familiar with the collection activities that have been conducted under the Protect America Act and will continue under this bill. I invite any of my colleagues who wish to know more about those activities to come speak to me in a classified setting. Publicly, all I can say is that I have serious concerns about how those activities may have impacted the civil liberties of Americans. If we grant these new powers to the government and the effects become known to the American people, we will realize what a mistake it was, of that I am sure."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/howie-klein/blue-america-thanks-some_b_111919.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thank Goodness for Senator Feingold!!
Liberals should organize around Senator Feingold. DU Activist corp should focus on supporting him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Feingold is the man!
I am glad to see that some of our elected officials in Congress take their oath of office seriously.

I wish there were more like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. "affirmatively misled'??
WTF? Doesn't he mean lied? I love Feingold, but come on guys, speak English.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. I tend to believe Fiengold on this
As well as the AT&T whistleblower.

Both of their rhetoric seems to coincide.

It is clear that most Senators have no idea what the program has been, but voted to extend it anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. KnR Russ is the Man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. Ok - Maybe we can settle for Feinglod REPLACING REID!!!
ASAP

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. If the president broke the law the statutory defenses are not
available to the telecoms that followed his directive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. so if he broke the law, why is he still in the WH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LVjinx Donating Member (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Because Nancy Pelosi has said for years impeachment isn't on the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. Pelosi is a stealth Republican.
Apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. And now Obama says so, too.
Such good little Bushies, these Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. because it's OK when Bush breaks the law?
as evidenced by the lack of accountability


Congress will just make it legal after-the-fact
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUlover2909 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 05:03 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I've seen that banana somewhere. Where?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. How would I know? :)
but, it comes from the animated rock group, "The Rotten Fruit"

As to where you've seen it...wouldn't know.

They have their own website and their picture could show up anywhere.

Also, they were the special featurette on the DVD, "Cabin Fever"









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. Broke many laws!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. Has Nancy Traitor budged any more on this? Or is she just teasing us, Russ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. Deleted sub-thread above - was amazingly Chickenshit.
Your kids are WAY to thin skinned.

I suggest replacing Obama with Feingold, one person has a panic attack and it's traumatic enough to get deleted

even before that person starts flapping around I also suggest replacing Reid with Feingold and it stays.

Moronic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Since the telecoms now have Retro-Immunity from Civil Suits
aren't they still open to Criminal Law Suits? Can't the Pres. be charged with violating the FISA Law after he leaves office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. According to John Dean - Yes, but not likely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. I guess priorities are on blow-jobs rather than obnoxious violations of basic rights-n-stuff.
This country is broken.

The government is a self-sustaining tool of destruction against 'democracy' because its members will focus on a lie involving personal relationships but do nothing about mass fraud committed against its own people and the world affecting hundreds of millions lives.

This country is broken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. Let me give you a couple of phone numbers, Russ, to get the ball rolling...
Nancy Pelosi -- she's the Speaker of the House who can put impeachment on the agenda: (202) 225-0100

John Conyers -- he's the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee who can introduce impeachment: (202) 225-5126





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
19. Then Demand Impeachment, Senator GroupThink
Sorry, but failure to impeach is a far worse problem than any impotent FISA law.

--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
21. Senator Feingold is my favorite! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
24. Much sand has been kicked up into the face of the American
people over all these spying powers. Some know the law has been broken but decide to comprimise anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC