Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Downsizing Government to Death

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 11:02 AM
Original message
Downsizing Government to Death
via CommonDreams:



Published on Sunday, July 20, 2008 by the Los Angeles Times

Downsizing Government to Death
Thanks to ‘E. coli conservatism,’ weakened government watchdogs have put us all at risk.

by Eric Lotke



Last week, consumers were worried about salmonella in their fresh tomatoes. Before that, it was E. coli in their spinach. Something is wrong. Eating a salad is not supposed to be a high-risk activity

But the problem isn’t so much farmers. It’s ideology. Historian Rick Perlstein, author of “Nixonland,” calls it “E. coli conservatism” — government shrinks and shrinks until people get sick.

“Government is not the solution to our problem,” President Reagan famously declared in his inaugural address in 1981. “Government is the problem.”

Many conservatives have gone far beyond that. Their traditional embrace of small government has been replaced with outright disdain for it. Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, doesn’t just want to shrink government. To use his words, he wants government “down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub.”

Once in power, E. coli conservatives shrink government by hamstringing it. They weaken rules that protect people, slash the budgets of consumer agencies and appoint industry friends to oversight commissions. The result: Some government regulatory agencies that we trust to protect us have shrunk to insignificance or serve private industry rather than consumers.

The Food and Drug Administration’s seeming ineptness in finding the source of a salmonella outbreak, which has poisoned more than 1,200 people in 42 states, is case in point. What’s especially troubling is that even before this episode, the Government Accountability Office had officially designated “federal oversight of food safety as a high-risk area.”

The FDA first thought that tomatoes — either grown in Florida or imported from Mexico — were the culprit. After weeks of trying to trace the source of the salmonella, with domestic farmers bulldozing crops they weren’t allowed to sell and taking a $100-million hit, the agency on Thursday ruled out tomatoes. It’s now on the trail of jalapeno peppers. ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/07/20/10488/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Government is administration
Reagan was a fucking idiot.

It is supposed to administer to our health, safety, and the availability of shared resources, being from water to breathable air.

The "free market" corrections we want to save us in the absence of government DON'T WORK at processing hubs. And free market corrections invariably are reactive; waiting until people die before "correcting".

Government is supposed to look ahead and avoid the shortcomings of free market pressures resulting from death and harm and "lessons learned" mentality. It does so by regulating industries, by inspecting for quality and safety and free market responsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. More "false flag" claims
Here's an interesting "false flag" view on this whole thing:


FDA Leaps from Tomatoes to Peppers in Desperate, Fumbling Fiasco of Failed Food Safety Over Salmonella
Posted by: kwan (IP Logged)
Date: July 12, 2008 10:16AM

(NaturalNews) Watching the FDA trip over its own clumsy self while groping for answers on Salmonella is a sad affair. Following the FDA-encouraged destruction of tens of millions of dollars of perfectly good tomatoes, this confused, bewildered agency admits that tomatoes may not have been the problem after all, and it has now set its sights on destroying the peppers industry. Is there no vegetable safe from the destruction of the FDA?

Tomatoes don't harbor salmonella, by the way. Neither do peppers, onions, cilantro or spinach. Salmonella only festers in factory-farmed animals, folks, and that means the real source of contamination is no doubt some animal factory upstream from the vegetable processing centers. So why isn't the FDA going after the animal factories that likely caused this whole fiasco? Because making Americans scared of their vegetables is a great way to advance the FDA's food irradiation agenda which would destroy virtually all the medicinal phytonutrients in plants.

(snip)

This salmonella scare, you see, isn't about tomatoes, peppers or cilantro.
It's about creating a state of fear in the minds of consumers -- a state that
can be invoked to further the FDA's pro-irradiation agenda.

These scare stories, in other words, are a lot like false flag operations in
the military, where conflicts are staged against one's own nation in order to
blame the enemy and declare war. See

So as it turns out, the FDA isn't fumbling around so much after all. It only
acts like it's clueless about these salmonella outbreaks in order to prolong
the problem, generate more fearful press coverage, and then appear as the
hero when it calls for widespread food irradiation.

link: http://www.rawfoodsupport.com/read.php?11,107983
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC