Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gergen: Libby lied; he and Cheney would not testify. There's something they don't want to discuss.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 11:39 PM
Original message
Gergen: Libby lied; he and Cheney would not testify. There's something they don't want to discuss.
Gergen: 'There's a lot more to know' in CIA leak case
March 7, 2007

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A top White House aide from past administrations speculates that some of the facts in the CIA leak case may never come to light, even with the conclusion of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby's perjury trial.

"What I do think is clear is that there's a lot more to know," White House veteran David Gergen said Tuesday. "And there had to be a reason why the defense attorney did not put Scooter Libby and the vice president on the stand."...

***

"Perhaps Ted Wells never even knew why Scooter Libby didn't want to go on the stand. But clearly, there's something behind this case," Gergen, a former adviser to Presidents Nixon, Ford, Reagan and Clinton, told CNN's "Larry King Live."

"Why would Scooter Libby lie, as the jury determined? Why would he not take the stand? Why would the vice president not take the stand? There's clearly something they do not wish to discuss. And I don't know what that is."

Appearing with Gergen, former White House press secretary Scott McClellan said, "It will be interesting to see if the White House can sustain not talking about this through the appeals process."...

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/03/07/cia.leak/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rusty charly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. gergen also described the bushies as
"scandal-free" up to now. (grain of salt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep. That statement has been throughly examined in other threads. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gergen is right. They are hiding that Cheney was involved in the Niger Forgery somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I just saw that mentioned here. Well, that would be a bombshell! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monktonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. Isnt there supposed to be a civil trial soon?
could plames lawyer call the vice president?
Something along the lines of " We have to prove that this guy is guilty of her losing her job beyond a shadow of a doubt, so, we need to explore every plausible scenierio ..yadda...."

Is that possible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Calling DU legal eagles! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ebayfool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. I don't see why not ...
if they can depose a sitting president, they can depose a vice prez! They just might wish they hadn't pushed for that precedent w/Clinton.

And it will be lovely to see, I'm sure. I'd sure pay to see it!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wow, Scott McClellan? SCOTT MCCLELLAN???
Even he now admits there's something bigger here than meets the eye? Even he now admits there are "questions"???

According to the article:

"I would be advising the White House to get out there and find some way to talk about this in enough detail to answer some of those questions that David brings up that are still hanging out there," added McClellan, a former spokesman for the Bush administration.


What happened to the happy moon-faced kool-aid drinker who never wanted any detailed information to get out or any questions to get answered?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Indeed -- what happened to Scotty! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC