|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Yes We Did (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 11:56 AM Original message |
This Just In!!! Rove Found In Comtempt!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
1. Well now he can do another round of the talk shows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yes We Did (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 11:58 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Try not to be SO pesimistic... please.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Sorry, hard to wish against experience in this case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
3. General population. Folsom. That is all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
4. Get out the tasers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yes We Did (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:02 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Screw the Tasers... I want one of those military ray guns! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Yeah, Tase Him!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
6. When will he be indicted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. Congress finding someone in contempt IS the indictment, AFAIK. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eomer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
28. No, not really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trashcanistanista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Sad but true. Inherent contempt would result in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 02:19 PM Response to Reply #28 |
43. Congress should find Mukasey in comtempt and impeach him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldhippie (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 03:42 PM Response to Reply #28 |
50. Does the House Sergeant at Arms have arrest powers ........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 05:40 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. Yes, under "inherent contempt" powers the Sergeant At Arms can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
8. Some quality time on the waterboard might be in order now! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underseasurveyor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
9. It's times like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
11. All clever comments, but WHAT HAPPENS NOW? I'm talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:16 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. Nothing will happen because Bush** will say that he does not have to listen to Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #20 |
36. and the DOJ is just another branch of * |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
12. Is that inherent contempt or is it a refer to the DOJ contempt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:07 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. lol! We posted basically the same thing a minute apart. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:11 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Obviously great minds think alike |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #17 |
33. Yep!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
13. Now it has to go to the House floor for a vote. If they don't vote to hold him in inherent contempt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
16. I already have the headlines prepared!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happydreams (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 03:25 PM Response to Reply #16 |
46. Rofl! Nice work! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
18. BUT they did that last year too !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zanne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:16 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Breeze--Could you post the link? I'd like to read the whole thing. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Yeah... I did an edit and added it but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 01:26 PM Response to Reply #18 |
41. Breeze: your article is that the Senate found him in contempt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Thanks for pointing that out but doesn't that mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 05:32 PM Response to Reply #44 |
53. I totally agree it is total BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
22. Just like Meyers and Bolton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
23. hooray!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:23 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. That's gonna hurt... eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prisoner_Number_Six (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
24. THIS JUST IN! CONGRESS FOUND CONTEMPTIBLE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:30 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Yep - Haven't seen anything happen in DC to warrant enthusiasm yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. The civil suits may be where the shredding action comes in to play. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #27 |
48. "Who is number one"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:44 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. Best. Post. Of. The. Day! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happydreams (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #24 |
47. I'm just glad it is in place for when the opportunity to arrest him comes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spinbaby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
30. So what next? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
32. Is the Marshall on his way? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:50 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Don't hold your breath but can you please pass the popcorn? I'm hungry! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftHander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
35. Does congress then ask the Justice Department arrest warrent? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 12:58 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Ask Bolton and Miers..... they were held in contempt Feb. 2008 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lugnut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
38. Yay! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lpbk2713 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
39. Someone dyslexic could read your title --- "Rove found incompetent." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
40. Just heard on Nova M that our fearful leader, Nancy Pelosi, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 03:40 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. I am so sick of that motherfucker! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 06:20 PM Response to Reply #49 |
56. Hey! Hey! Me, too. What is up? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 07:51 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Hey hey you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-31-08 05:45 AM Response to Reply #57 |
60. Raising hell about McDeath. He did me a big favor when he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sonias (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
42. Best news today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
45. Rove voted to be in contempt. Stern Letter To Follow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
51. K&R.nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yes We Did (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
52. Huh... Maybe I should have posted this in breaking news... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libodem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
55. I hope something comes of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lala_rawraw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-30-08 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
58. hell, i have held him in contempt for years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-31-08 01:53 AM Response to Original message |
59. Hallelujah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 06:55 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC