2. I used to do that, but recently Thom explained why he has these asswipes on.
He explained that it's important for all of us to know how to counter these types of people when we encounter them in our daily lives. It's like a training session for debunking Repug talking points.
Now that I view it that way, it's easier to listen and learn.
5. Their agenda is quite narrow - therefore, they are predictable. In one way Thom
is right in that we can learn how to counter and he is a good one to do that. It's a wonder that they even go on his show. Perhaps The Terry types are not getting enough air time on corporate tv.
7. I was getting annoyed that Thom didn't ask Inhofe's paid LIAR who the organization awarding
Edited on Wed Jul-30-08 01:16 PM by patrice
petro-chemical's pet scientist his award is.
Inhofe's flunkie kept saying "... award winning scientist..." so-and-so as though whatever the award was is proof of the scientist's validity - when anykind of organization that wants to can put itself together and handout awards for whatever they want to hand out awards for. Doesn't necessrily mean anything valid about environmental science.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.