Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brad Blog: The Purported 'Anthrax Killer', Was a Registered Democrat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:45 PM
Original message
Brad Blog: The Purported 'Anthrax Killer', Was a Registered Democrat
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6245

Bruce E. Ivins, reportedly on the verge of being indicted for capital murder in the anthrax killings, was a registered Democrat, according to the Fredrick County, MD Board of Elections. He had been registered there since 1982 and records indicate that he voted in "every election since 1996," including Democratic primaries, according to the official who responded to a request from West Virginia-based radio host Bob Kincaid.

The party affiliation of the bio-terror researcher who worked at U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Disease (USAMRIID) adds a notable twist to the ever increasing questions surrounding the bizarre case following Ivins' reported suicide last week. He was, according to media reports, soon to be indicted for charges related to the post-9/11 terror attacks that rocked the nation and, as Salon's Glen Greenwald has very effectively argued, served as crucial influence towards marching the country towards war with Iraq.

Last week, as the story of Ivins' reported suicide were breaking, The BRAD BLOG excoriated the corporate mainstream media for failing to note that the targets of the multiple post-9/11 terror attacks on American soil were primarily powerful men, perceived as "liberals" by the Republican rightwing. Nonetheless, despite two senior Democratic U.S. senators, Tom Daschle of SD and Patrick Leahy of VT, having been the only known governmental targets in the deadly letter campaign, which also included perceived "liberal" media figurehead Tom Brokaw, the MSM coverage --- almost uniformly --- failed to note the obvious correlations in the attacks. Most even failed to even mention the names of those who were directly targeted in what was clearly meant to appear as a follow-up attack from Muslim extremists.

Furthermore, as we also noted on Friday, despite a parade of reporters who had contacted Ivins' oldest brother Thomas that day for comment, not one of them --- until us --- bothered even to inquire about Bruce's political leanings or affiliations.

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6245">More Here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Must have been a DLCer!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

That was too snarky for a :sarcasm:

And from what I've heard, Fred Phelps was also a Democrat. Probably a Blue Dog.

:crazy:

It only proves that political affiliation doesn't mean shit. I'm surprised limpballs or Hannity didn't break it first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Most scientists are Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm sure you have documentation to back up that claim.
I'd love to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I have no documentation, but
having worked in medical research for 10 years before changing careers, I can say that in my experience Republicons were few and far between in basic science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You've absolutely convinced me that most scientists are Democrats.
Medical Research? Congratulations. Your post proves nothing more than your own personal bias.

How do you define "basic science"?

In your "experience", how many "republicons" were there in "basic science"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. bias? no. Anecdotal? yes. YOUR bias is showing by your response. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. I will try to get some hard data for you.
I read a survey in a professional journal in a few months ago, and I will try to get that data.

Here are a couple links, but they don't have data, and I'm interested in seeing the numbers too!

http://www.heritage.org/Press/Commentary/ed050808a.cfm

http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2005/12/21/politics



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clovis29 Donating Member (279 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Which means exactly nothing
Insanity has no ideology (well, except for the really gone rethugs).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. If he's being framed, that would be perfectly logical n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Where it stops, nobody knows...
K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samdogmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. Oh, oh! Now why would he target Democrats with his mailings?
This simply doesn't make sense!

I truly hope this doesn't get buried like every other nefarious thing the present administration has orchestrated. Someone caused the death of many innocent people, they should be punished!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. A Democrat in Maryland? I'm shocked! Just shocked I tell ya.
Hell! We only have two republicans in the state. I think their names are Bob Ehrlich and Mike Steele. A Democrat in Maryland. That's one for the No Shit Sherlock file.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
14. sounds like a REVENGE killer to me -- Duley was right on target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC